Blog
About

361
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    22
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reconstructing Syntactic Variation in Proto-Indo-European

      Indo-European Linguistics

      Brill

      comparative method, internal reconstruction, syntax, Indo-European

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper discusses the problem of linguistic reconstruction in the Indo-European languages with particular attention to syntax. While many scholars consider syntactic reconstruction as being in principle impossible, other scholars simply apply to syntax the same tenets of the Comparative Method and of Internal Reconstruction, which were originally used in Indo-European studies for reconstructing phonology and morphology. Accordingly, it is assumed that synchronically anomalous syntactic structures are more ancient than productive syntactic constructions; the former are considered as being residues of an early stage of Proto-Indo-European, where they were also more regular and took part in a consistent syntactic system. Various hypotheses of Proto-Indo-European as a syntactically consistent language, which in the last years have witnessed resurgence, are here discussed and criticized. We argue that syntactic consistency is nowhere attested in the Indo-European languages, which in their earliest records rather document an amazing structural variation. Accordingly, we reconstruct Proto-Indo-European as an inconsistent syntactic system in the domains of word order, agreement, configurationality, and alignment, and we consider inconsistency and structural variation to be an original condition of languages. Moreover, we make some proposals for the appropriate use of typology in linguistic reconstruction, with some examples of what can or cannot be reconstructed in syntax.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Identificational focus versus information focus

           Katalin Kiss (1998)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Beyond subject and object Toward a comprehensive relational typology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                22125892
                Indo-European Linguistics
                IEUL
                Brill (The Netherlands )
                2212-5884
                2212-5892
                2014
                : 2
                : 1
                : 73-111
                Affiliations
                University of Zurich, Switzerland carlotta.viti@ 123456klphs.uzh.ch
                10.1163/22125892-00201004
                Copyright 2014 by Carlotta Viti

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License.

                Social & Behavioral Sciences, Law

                Indo-European, syntax, internal reconstruction, comparative method

                Comments

                Comment on this article