Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Social media use has exploded, attaining a significant influence within medicine. Previous studies have denoted the use of social media in various surgical specialties as a means to exchange professional ideas and improve the conference experience and at the same time, some have assessed its feasibility as a method of education. This systematic review aims to characterize the use of social media as a tool for general surgery education.

          Methods

          A systematic review of several databases from each database inception was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The JBI’s critical appraisal tools were used to assess quality of the studies.

          Results

          A total of 861 articles were identified of which 222 were duplicates removed. The titles and abstracts from the remaining 639 abstracts were screened and 589 were excluded. The remaining 51 full articles were analyzed for eligibility, of which 24 met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. These studies covered the general surgery specialty, of which 11 ( n = 46%) focused on the laparoscopic surgical approach, 1 ( n = 4%) on robotic-assisted surgical procedures, 1 ( n = 4%) on both surgical approaches previously mentioned and 11 ( n = 46%) on the general surgery specialty regardless of the surgical approach or technique.

          Conclusions

          Advantages that SM offers should be considered, and content creators and institutions should help collectively to make sure that the content being published is evidence and guideline-based so its use it is taken to the maximum benefit.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.

            There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction.

              During the last 100 years, a major accomplishment of psychology has been the development of a science of learning aimed at understanding how people learn. In attempting to apply the science of learning, a central challenge of psychology and education is the development of a science of instruction aimed at understanding how to present material in ways that help people learn. The author provides an overview of how the design of multimedia instruction can be informed by the science of learning and the science of instruction, which yields 10 principles of multimedia instructional design that are grounded in theory and based on evidence. Overall, the relationship between the science of learning and the science of instruction is reciprocal.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dilaurentino@gmail.com
                Journal
                Surg Endosc
                Surg Endosc
                Surgical Endoscopy
                Springer US (New York )
                0930-2794
                1432-2218
                1 March 2022
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.240283.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2152 0791, Department of Surgery, , Montefiore Medical Center, ; 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.240324.3, ISNI 0000 0001 2109 4251, Division of General Surgery, , NYU Langone Health, ; New York, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-1284
                Article
                9150
                10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9
                8886864
                35230534
                95bb7f38-2af6-443d-b907-46b197f251f4
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 8 December 2021
                : 15 February 2022
                Categories
                Review Article

                Surgery
                social media,social networking,education,laparoscopy,robotics,minimally invasive surgery
                Surgery
                social media, social networking, education, laparoscopy, robotics, minimally invasive surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article