63
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Schools in many countries undertake programmes for smoking prevention, but systematic reviews have shown mixed evidence of their effectiveness. Most peer-led approaches have been classroom-based, and rigorous assessments are scarce. We assessed the effectiveness of a peer-led intervention that aimed to prevent smoking uptake in secondary schools.

          Methods

          We undertook a cluster randomised controlled trial of 10 730 students aged 12–13 years in 59 schools in England and Wales. 29 schools (5372 students) were randomly assigned by stratified block randomisation to the control group to continue their usual smoking education and 30 (5358 students) to the intervention group. The intervention (ASSIST [A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial] programme) consisted of training influential students to act as peer supporters during informal interactions outside the classroom to encourage their peers not to smoke. Follow-up was immediately after the intervention and at 1 and 2 years. Primary outcomes were smoking in the past week in both the school year group and in a group at high risk of regular smoking uptake, which was identified at baseline as occasional, experimental, or ex-smokers. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN55572965.

          Findings

          The odds ratio of being a smoker in intervention compared with control schools was 0·75 (95% CI 0·55–1·01) immediately after the intervention (n=9349 students), 0·77 (0·59–0·99) at 1-year follow-up (n=9147), and 0·85 (0·72–1·01) at 2-year follow-up (n=8756). The corresponding odds ratios for the high-risk group were 0·79 (0·55–1·13 [n=3561]), 0·75 (0·56–0·99 [n=3483]), and 0·85 (0·70–1·02 [n=3294]), respectively. In a three-tier multilevel model with data from all three follow-ups, the odds of being a smoker in intervention compared with control schools was 0·78 (0·64–0·96).

          Interpretation

          The results suggest that, if implemented on a population basis, the ASSIST intervention could lead to a reduction in adolescent smoking prevalence of public-health importance.

          Funding

          MRC (UK).

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diffusion of innovation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Peers and adolescent smoking.

            K Kobus (2003)
            There is a considerable body of empirical research that has identified adolescent peer relationships as a primary factor involved in adolescent cigarette smoking. Despite this large research base, many questions remain unanswered about the mechanisms by which peers affect youths' smoking behavior. Understanding these processes of influence is key to the development of prevention and intervention programs designed to address adolescent smoking as a significant public health concern. In this paper, theoretical frameworks and empirical findings are reviewed critically which inform the current state of knowledge regarding peer influences on teenage smoking. Specifically, social learning theory, primary socialization theory, social identity theory and social network theory are discussed. Empirical findings regarding peer influence and selection, as well as multiple reference points in adolescent friendships, including best friendships, romantic relationships, peer groups and social crowds, are also reviewed. Review of this work reveals the contribution that peers have in adolescents' use of tobacco, in some cases promoting use, and in other cases deterring it. This review also suggests that peer influences on smoking are more subtle than commonly thought and need to be examined more carefully, including consideration of larger social contexts, e.g. the family, neighborhood, and media. Recommendations for future investigations are made, as well as suggestions for specific methodological approaches that offer promise for advancing our knowledge of the contribution of peers on adolescent tobacco use.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet Publishing Group
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                10 May 2008
                10 May 2008
                : 371
                : 9624
                : 1595-1602
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [b ]Cardiff Institute of Society, Health and Ethics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
                [c ]Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [d ]Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Prof R Campbell, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK Rona.Campbell@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
                Article
                LANCET60692
                10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60692-3
                2387195
                18468543
                962c8626-ec46-47c9-b305-30395ad2dff6
                2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article