11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      NTRK gene aberrations in triple‐negative breast cancer: detection challenges using IHC, FISH, RT‐PCR, and NGS

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is usually an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are cancer type‐agnostic emerging biomarkers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the selection of patients for targeted therapy. The main aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK aberrations, i.e. fusions, gene copy number gain, and amplification, in a series of TNBC using different methods. A total of 83 TNBCs were analyzed using pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), and RNA‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Of 83 cases, 16 showed pan‐TRK positivity although no cases had NTRK‐fusions. Indeed, FISH showed four cases carrying an atypical NTRK1 pattern consisting of one fusion signal and one/more single green signals, but all cases were negative for fusion by NGS and RT‐PCR testing. In addition, FISH analysis showed six cases with NTRK1 amplification, one case with NTRK2 copy number gain, and five cases with NTRK3 copy number gain, all negative for pan‐TRK IHC. Our data demonstrate that IHC has a high false‐positive rate for the detection of fusions and molecular testing is mandatory; there is no need to perform additional molecular tests in cases negativity for NTRK by IHC. In conclusion, the NTRK genes are not involved in fusions in TNBC, but both copy number gain and amplification are frequent events, suggesting a possible predictive role for other NTRK aberrations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Insights into Molecular Classifications of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Selection for Treatment

          Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the most challenging breast cancer subtype to treat. To date, therapies directed to specific molecular targets have rarely achieved clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes of patients with TNBC, and chemotherapy remains the standard-of-care. Here we seek to review the most recent efforts to classify TNBC based on comprehensive profiling of tumors for cellular composition and molecular features. Technological advances allow for tumor characterization at ever increasing depth, generating data that, if integrated with clinical-pathologic features, may help improve risk stratification of patients, guide treatment decisions and surveillance, and help identify new targets for drug development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

            To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance. Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              NTRK fusion-positive cancers and TRK inhibitor therapy

              NTRK gene fusions involving either NTRK1 , NTRK2 , or NTRK3 (encoding the neurotrophin receptors TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC, respectively) are oncogenic drivers of various adult and paediatric tumour types. These fusions can be detected in the clinic using a variety of methods, including tumour DNA and RNA sequencing and plasma cell-free DNA profiling. The treatment of patients with NTRK fusion-positive cancers with a first-generation TRK inhibitor, such as larotrectinib or entrectinib, is associated with high response rates (>75%), regardless of tumour histology. First-generation TRK inhibitors are well tolerated by most patients, with toxicity profiles characterized by occasional off-tumour, on-target adverse events (attributable to TRK inhibition in non-malignant tissues). Despite durable disease control in many patients, advanced-stage NTRK fusion-positive cancers eventually become refractory to TRK inhibition; resistance can be mediated by the acquisition of NTRK kinase domain mutations. Fortunately, certain resistance mutations can be overcome by second-generation TRK inhibitors, including LOXO-195 and TPX-0005 that are being explored in clinical trials. In this Review, we discuss the biology of NTRK fusions, strategies to target these drivers in the treatment-naive and acquired-resistance disease settings, and the unique safety profile of TRK inhibitors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                renato.franco@unicampania.it
                Journal
                J Pathol Clin Res
                J Pathol Clin Res
                10.1002/(ISSN)2056-4538
                CJP2
                The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2056-4538
                04 May 2023
                September 2023
                : 9
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/cjp2.v9.5 )
                : 367-377
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli” Naples Italy
                [ 2 ] Ospedale Evangelico Betania Naples Italy
                [ 3 ] Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
                [ 4 ] Anatomical Pathology Department, IRCCS CROB Rionero in Vulture Italy
                [ 5 ] Pathology Unit S.M. delle Grazie Hospital Naples Italy
                [ 6 ] Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Pathology Section University of Naples “Federico II” Naples Italy
                [ 7 ] Scientific Direction, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS‐CROB) Rionero in Vulture Italy
                [ 8 ] Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli” Naples Italy
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Renato Franco, Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy. E‐mail: renato.franco@ 123456unicampania.it

                [†]

                Joint last authors.

                Article
                CJP2324
                10.1002/cjp2.324
                10397374
                37143440
                975af38c-6d07-428f-bca5-2f0330ae30c5
                © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 March 2023
                : 25 November 2022
                : 07 April 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 11, Words: 6727
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.2 mode:remove_FC converted:02.08.2023

                triple‐negative breast carcinoma,neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (ntrk), ntrk fusions, ntrk amplification,ihc,fish,rt‐pcr,ngs

                Comments

                Comment on this article