5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sociodemographic and clinical factors for non-hospital deaths among cancer patients: A nationwide population-based cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Factors associated with place of death inform policies with respect to allocating end-of-life care resources and tailoring supportive measures.

          Objective

          To determine factors associated with non-hospital deaths among cancer patients.

          Design

          Retrospective cohort study of cancer decedents, examining factors associated with non-hospital deaths using multinomial logistic regression with hospital deaths as the reference category.

          Setting/subjects

          Cancer patients (n = 15254) in Singapore who died during the study period from January 1, 2012 till December 31, 2105 at home, acute hospital, long-term care (LTC) or hospice were included.

          Results

          Increasing age (categories ≥65 years: RRR 1.25–2.61), female (RRR 1.40; 95% CI 1.28–1.52), Malays (RRR 1.67; 95% CI 1.47–1.89), Brain malignancy (RRR 1.92; 95% CI 1.15–3.23), metastatic disease (RRR 1.33–2.01) and home palliative care (RRR 2.11; 95% CI 1.95–2.29) were associated with higher risk of home deaths. Patients with low socioeconomic status were more likely to have hospice or LTC deaths: those living in smaller housing types had higher risk of dying in hospice (1–4 rooms apartment: RRR 1.13–3.17) or LTC (1–5 rooms apartment: RRR 1.36–4.11); and those with Medifund usage had higher risk of dying in LTC (RRR 1.74; 95% CI 1.36–2.21). Patients with haematological malignancies had increased risk of dying in hospital (categories of haematological subtypes: RRR 0.06–0.87).

          Conclusions

          We found key sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with non-hospital deaths in cancer patients. More can be done to enable patients to die in the community and with dignity rather than in a hospital.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers

          Background Extensive evidence shows that well over 50% of people prefer to be cared for and to die at home provided circumstances allow choice. Despite best efforts and policies, one-third or less of all deaths take place at home in many countries of the world. Objectives 1. To quantify the effect of home palliative care services for adult patients with advanced illness and their family caregivers on patients' odds of dying at home; 2. to examine the clinical effectiveness of home palliative care services on other outcomes for patients and their caregivers such as symptom control, quality of life, caregiver distress and satisfaction with care; 3. to compare the resource use and costs associated with these services; 4. to critically appraise and summarise the current evidence on cost-effectiveness. Search methods We searched 12 electronic databases up to November 2012. We checked the reference lists of all included studies, 49 relevant systematic reviews, four key textbooks and recent conference abstracts. We contacted 17 experts and researchers for unpublished data. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), controlled before and after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITSs) evaluating the impact of home palliative care services on outcomes for adults with advanced illness or their family caregivers, or both. Data collection and analysis One review author assessed the identified titles and abstracts. Two independent reviewers performed assessment of all potentially relevant studies, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality. We carried out meta-analysis where appropriate and calculated numbers needed to treat to benefit (NNTBs) for the primary outcome (death at home). Main results We identified 23 studies (16 RCTs, 6 of high quality), including 37,561 participants and 4042 family caregivers, largely with advanced cancer but also congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), HIV/AIDS and multiple sclerosis (MS), among other conditions. Meta-analysis showed increased odds of dying at home (odds ratio (OR) 2.21, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.71; Z = 2.98, P value = 0.003; Chi2 = 20.57, degrees of freedom (df) = 6, P value = 0.002; I2 = 71%; NNTB 5, 95% CI 3 to 14 (seven trials with 1222 participants, three of high quality)). In addition, narrative synthesis showed evidence of small but statistically significant beneficial effects of home palliative care services compared to usual care on reducing symptom burden for patients (three trials, two of high quality, and one CBA with 2107 participants) and of no effect on caregiver grief (three RCTs, two of high quality, and one CBA with 2113 caregivers). Evidence on cost-effectiveness (six studies) is inconclusive. Authors' conclusions The results provide clear and reliable evidence that home palliative care increases the chance of dying at home and reduces symptom burden in particular for patients with cancer, without impacting on caregiver grief. This justifies providing home palliative care for patients who wish to die at home. More work is needed to study cost-effectiveness especially for people with non-malignant conditions, assessing place of death and appropriate outcomes that are sensitive to change and valid in these populations, and to compare different models of home palliative care, in powered studies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers When faced with the prospect of dying with an advanced illness, the majority of people prefer to die at home, yet in many countries around the world they are most likely to die in hospital. We reviewed all known studies that evaluated home palliative care services, i.e. experienced home care teams of health professionals specialised in the control of a wide range of problems associated with advanced illness – physical, psychological, social, spiritual. We wanted to see how much of a difference these services make to people's chances of dying at home, but also to other important aspects for patients towards the end of life, such as symptoms (e.g. pain) and family distress. We also compared the impact on the costs with care. On the basis of 23 studies including 37,561 patients and 4042 family caregivers, we found that when someone with an advanced illness gets home palliative care, their chances of dying at home more than double. Home palliative care services also help reduce the symptom burden people may experience as a result of advanced illness, without increasing grief for family caregivers after the patient dies. In these circumstances, patients who wish to die at home should be offered home palliative care. There is still scope to improve home palliative care services and increase the benefits for patients and families without raising costs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life cancer care in the universal health care system of Ontario, Canada.

            To describe trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care in a universal health care system in Ontario, Canada, between 1993 and 2004, and to compare with findings reported in the United States. A population-based, retrospective, cohort study that used administrative data linked to registry data. Aggressiveness of EOL care was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following indicators: last dose of chemotherapy received within 14 days of death; more than one emergency department (ED) visit within 30 days of death; more than one hospitalization within 30 days of death; or at least one intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 30 days of death. Among 227,161 patients, 22.4% experienced at least one incident of potentially aggressive EOL cancer care. Multivariable analyses showed that with each successive year, patients were significantly more likely to encounter some aggressive intervention (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02). Multiple emergency department (ED) visits, ICU admissions, and chemotherapy use increased significantly over time, whereas multiple hospital admissions declined (P < .05). Patients were more likely to receive aggressive EOL care if they were men, were younger, lived in rural regions, had a higher level of comorbidity, or had breast, lung, or hematologic malignancies. Chemotherapy and ICU utilization were lower in Ontario than in the United States. Aggressiveness of cancer care near the EOL is increasing over time in Ontario, Canada, although overall rates were lower than in the United States. Health system characteristics and patient or physician cultural factors may play a role in the observed differences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Identifying Potential Indicators of the Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care From Administrative Data

              To explore potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life services for cancer patients that could be monitored using existing administrative data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                23 April 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 4
                : e0232219
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
                [2 ] Policy Research and Evaluation Division, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
                [3 ] National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
                [4 ] Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
                [5 ] Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
                [6 ] Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
                [7 ] Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
                Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-9968
                Article
                PONE-D-19-32863
                10.1371/journal.pone.0232219
                7179880
                32324837
                9880dcdb-158b-4f1e-b323-f0bf820414ac
                © 2020 Zhuang et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 26 November 2019
                : 9 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Pages: 14
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Palliative Care
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Hospitals
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Housing
                Social Sciences
                Human Geography
                Housing
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Quality of Life
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                Singapore
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Hematology
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                Malay People
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Ethnic Epidemiology
                Custom metadata
                Access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings due to national data protection laws and restrictions imposed by the Ethics Committees and Singapore Ministry of Health to ensure data privacy of the study participants. As such they cannot be made freely available in the manuscript, the supplemental files, or a public repository. Anonymised administrative data from Singapore Ministry of Health is available for research upon request by researchers and subject to approval by Singapore Ministry of Health. Please contact Dr. Kelvin Bryan Tan, Director (Policy, Research and Evaluation Division), Ministry of Health at Kelvin_Bryan_TAN@ 123456moh.gov.sg or Lee Shi Qi ( LEE_Shi_Qi@ 123456moh.gov.sg ) for any data request.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article