5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protected area staff and local community viewpoints: A qualitative assessment of conservation relationships in Zimbabwe

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With the increase in illegal resource harvesting in most protected areas (PAs), the need to understand the determinants and relationships between PAs and local communities to enhance wildlife conservation is increasingly becoming important. Using focus group discussions and interviews, we established the determinants of PA staff-community relationship from both PA staff and local communities’ viewpoints, and assessedperceptions of their relationship with each other. The study was guided by the following main research question, ‘What is the nature of the relationship between PA staff and local communities and what are the main factors influencing the relationship?’ Data were collected through focus group discussions and interviews from four PAs and their adjacent communities in Zimbabwe between July 2013 and February 2014. Our results showed that a total of seven determinants were identified as influencing PA staff-community relationship, i.e., benefit-sharing, human-wildlife conflict, compensation for losses from wildlife attacks, communication between PA staff and local communities, community participation in the management of CAMPFIRE projects, lack of community participation in tourism in PAs, and community perceptions of PA staff or PA staff perceptions of the community. Of the seven, only one determinant, benefit-sharing, was recorded as the main factor that differentially influencesthe perceptions of community and PA staff on their relationship. Furthermore, both the communities and PA staff reported mixed perceptions on their relationship with each other. We conclude that both communities’ and PA staff’s views on determinants are largely similar in all studied PAs irrespective of PA ownership, management and/or land use. Our findings could be relevant in policy making especially in developing countries in developing PA-community relationship framework in natural resource conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty.

          It is widely accepted that biodiversity loss and poverty are linked problems and that conservation and poverty reduction should be tackled together. However, success with integrated strategies is elusive. There is sharp debate about the social impacts of conservation programs and the success of community-based approaches to conservation. Clear conceptual frameworks are needed if policies in these two areas are to be combined. We review the links between poverty alleviation and biodiversity conservation and present a conceptual typology of these relationships.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Conservation outside of parks: attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                19 May 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 5
                : e0177153
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Hospitality and Tourism, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Private Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
                [2 ]School of Wildlife, Ecology and Conservation, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Private Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
                Auburn University, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: CNM NM EG.

                • Data curation: CNM.

                • Formal analysis: CNM EG NM.

                • Funding acquisition: CNM.

                • Investigation: CNM.

                • Methodology: CNM EG NM.

                • Project administration: CNM NM EG.

                • Supervision: NM EG.

                • Validation: CNM EG NM.

                • Writing – original draft: CNM NM EG.

                • Writing – review & editing: CNM EG NM.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-21742
                10.1371/journal.pone.0177153
                5438145
                28542185
                98b081be-043d-4419-889b-7fcd7e37893b
                © 2017 Mutanga et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 May 2016
                : 24 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 6, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: Chinhoyi University of Technology
                Award ID: PG4404
                Award Recipient :
                The work was supported by Chinhoyi University of Technology PG4404, www.cut.ac.zw, to CNM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preperation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Animal Types
                Wildlife
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Types
                Wildlife
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Livestock
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Grasses
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Natural Resources
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Grazing
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Grazing
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Africa
                Zimbabwe
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Communications
                Social Communication
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article