19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing quality of maternity care in Hungary: expert validation and testing of the mother-centered prenatal care (MCPC) survey instrument

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Instruments to assess quality of maternity care in Central and Eastern European (CEE) region are scarce, despite reports of poor doctor-patient communication, non-evidence-based care, and informal cash payments. We validated and tested an online questionnaire to study maternity care experiences among Hungarian women.

          Methods

          Following literature review, we collated validated items and scales from two previous English-language surveys and adapted them to the Hungarian context. An expert panel assessed items for clarity and relevance on a 4-point ordinal scale. We calculated item-level Content Validation Index (CVI) scores. We designed 9 new items concerning informal cash payments, as well as 7 new “model of care” categories based on mode of payment. The final questionnaire ( N = 111 items) was tested in two samples of Hungarian women, representative ( N = 600) and convenience ( N = 657). We conducted bivariate analysis and thematic analysis of open-ended responses.

          Results

          Experts rated pre-existing English-language items as clear and relevant to Hungarian women’s maternity care experiences with an average CVI for included questions of 0.97. Significant differences emerged across the model of care categories in terms of informal payments, informed consent practices, and women’s perceptions of autonomy. Thematic analysis ( N = 1015) of women’s responses identified 13 priority areas of the maternity care experience, 9 of which were addressed by the questionnaire.

          Conclusions

          We developed and validated a comprehensive questionnaire that can be used to evaluate respectful maternity care, evidence-based practice, and informal cash payments in CEE region and beyond.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determination and quantification of content validity.

          M Lynn (1986)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute

            Purpose To provide an overview of PCORI’s approach to engagement in research. Methods The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) was established in 2010 to fund patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. Requirements for research funding from PCORI include meaningful engagement of patients and other stakeholders in the research. PCORI’s approach to engagement in research is guided by a conceptual model of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), that provides a structure for understanding engagement in research. Results To understand and improve engagement in research PCORI is learning from awardees and other stakeholders. Those efforts are described along with PCORI’s capacity building and guidance to awardees via the Engagement Rubric. PCORI’s unique model of engaging patients and other stakeholders in merit review of funding applications is also described. Additional support for learning about engagement in research is provided through specific research funding and through PCORI’s major infrastructure initiative, PCORnet. Conclusion PCORI requires engagement of stakeholders in the research it funds. In addition PCORI engages stakeholders in activities including review of funding applications and establishment of CER research infrastructure through PCORnet. The comprehensive approach to engagement is being evaluated to help guide the field toward promising practices in research engagement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global epidemic of abuse and disrespect during childbirth: History, evidence, interventions, and FIGO's mother-baby friendly birthing facilities initiative.

              Recent evidence indicates that disrespectful/abusive/coercive service delivery by skilled providers in facilities, which results in actual or perceived poor quality of care, is directly and indirectly associated with adverse maternal and newborn outcomes. The present article reviews the evidence for disrespectful/abusive care during childbirth in facilities (DACF), describes examples of DACF, discusses organizations active in a rights-based respectful maternity care movement, and enumerates some strategies and interventions that have been identified to decrease DACF. It concludes with a discussion of one strategy, which has been recently implemented by FIGO with global partners-the International Pediatrics Association, International Confederation of Midwives, the White Ribbon Alliance, and WHO. This strategy, the Mother and Baby Friendly Birth Facility (MBFBF) Initiative, is a criterion-based audit process based on human rights' doctrines, and modeled on WHO/UNICEF's Baby Friendly Facility Initiative.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nicholas.rubashkin@ucsf.edu
                +36-1210-2953 , szebik.imre@med.semmelweis-univ.hu
                +36-1482-5308 , petra.baji@uni-corvinus.hu
                +36-1210-2953 , szanto.zsuzsa@med.semmelweis-univ.hu
                +36-1210-2953 , susanszky.eva@med.semmelweis-univ.hu
                604 822 0352 , saraswathi.vedam@ubc.ca
                Journal
                Reprod Health
                Reprod Health
                Reproductive Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-4755
                16 November 2017
                16 November 2017
                2017
                : 14
                : 152
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Departments of Global Health Sciences and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, , University of California at San Francisco, ; Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, California 94158 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0942 9821, GRID grid.11804.3c, Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, ; VIII. Nagyvárad tér 4. XX. Em, Budapest, H-1089 Hungary
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9234 5858, GRID grid.17127.32, Department of Health Economics, , Corvinus University of Budapest, ; Fővám tér 8. Main Building Room E113, Budapest, 1093 Hungary
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, GRID grid.17091.3e, The Birth Place Lab, Faculty of Medicine, , The University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, Canada
                [5 ]Midwifery Program | Department of Family Practice, Suite 320 - 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-0532
                Article
                413
                10.1186/s12978-017-0413-3
                5689156
                29145863
                9bd26b9f-1c98-4aec-9591-50494bfd16fb
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 June 2017
                : 10 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010629, Fulbright Association;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003549, Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alapprogramok;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                questionnaire,validation,respectful maternity care,informal payments,hungary

                Comments

                Comment on this article