4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland: a clinicopathological analysis of two cases

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant tumour of the salivary gland, primarily involving the parotid gland. Here, the cases of two patients, aged 47 and 67 years, respectively, who underwent surgery for pathologically confirmed Warthin-like MEC of the parotid gland between January 2019 and December 2019 in Anyang Tumour Hospital, are described. In each case, the tumour consisted of epithelial and lymphoid cell components, covered with two or more layers of epithelium, with visible scattered mucous cells, and lymphoid stroma with a large number of lymphocytes and germinal centres formed. Most importantly, the tumours lacked the well-organized, bilayered oncocytic epithelial structure that is characteristic of Warthin’s tumour. Mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 2 ( MAML2) gene rearrangements were identified in the tumour cells using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes, confirming the diagnosis of Warthin-like MEC. Post-operatively, patients have remained disease free for 31 and 27 months, respectively. Warthin-like MEC of the parotid gland is rare and is often misdiagnosed as metaplastic Warthin’s tumour. Diagnosis depends mainly on the unique clinicopathologic features together with FISH analyses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development.

          A case report is a narrative that describes, for medical, scientific, or educational purposes, a medical problem experienced by one or more patients. Case reports written without guidance from reporting standards are insufficiently rigorous to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. Develop, disseminate, and implement systematic reporting guidelines for case reports. We used a three-phase consensus process consisting of (1) pre-meeting literature review and interviews to generate items for the reporting guidelines, (2) a face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the reporting guidelines, and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines. This consensus process involved 27 participants and resulted in a 13-item checklist-a reporting guideline for case reports. The primary items of the checklist are title, key words, abstract, introduction, patient information, clinical findings, timeline, diagnostic assessment, therapeutic interventions, follow-up and outcomes, discussion, patient perspective, and informed consent. We believe the implementation of the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines by medical journals will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports will inform clinical study design, provide early signals of effectiveness and harms, and improve healthcare delivery. © 2013 Gagnier et al.; licensee Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            MAML2 Rearrangements in Variant Forms of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

            Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common salivary gland malignancy. Recent studies have shown that most MECs harbor gene fusions involving MAML2-an alteration that appears to be specific for MEC, a finding that could be diagnostically useful. While most cases of MEC are histologically straightforward, uncommon variants can cause considerable diagnostic difficulty. We present 2 variants of MEC for which MAML2 studies were crucial in establishing a diagnosis: a previously undescribed ciliated variant, and the recently described Warthin-like variant. All cases of ciliated and Warthin-like MEC were retrieved from the archives of The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization for MAML2 was performed on all cases. One ciliated MEC and 6 Warthin-like MECs were identified. The ciliated MEC presented as a 4.6 cm cystic lymph node metastasis originating from the tongue base in a 47-year-old woman. The Warthin-like MECs presented as parotid masses ranging in size from 1.2 to 3.3 (mean, 2.7 cm) in 4 women and 2 men. The ciliated MEC consisted of macrocystic spaces punctuated by tubulopapillary proliferations of squamoid cells and ciliated columnar cells. The Warthin-like MECs were comprised of cystic spaces lined by multilayered oncocytic to squamoid cells surrounded by a circumscribed cuff of lymphoid tissue with germinal centers. In these cases, the Warthin-like areas dominated the histologic picture. Conventional MEC, when present, represented a minor tumor component. MAML2 rearrangements were identified in all cases. Warthin-like MEC, and now a ciliated form of MEC, are newly described variants of a common salivary gland carcinoma. Unfamiliarity with these novel forms, unanticipated cellular features (eg, cilia), and morphologic overlap with mundane benign processes (eg, developmental ciliated cysts, Warthin tumor) or other carcinomas (eg, ciliated human papillomavirus-related carcinoma) may render these variants susceptible to misdiagnosis. These unusual variants appear to consistently harbor MAML2 fusions-a finding that establishes a clear link to conventional MEC and provides a valuable adjunct in establishing the diagnosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Warthin-like Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

              There has been some debate as to whether a subset of metaplastic Warthin tumors (mWTs) harbor the mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC)-associated CRTC1-MAML2 fusion. We analyzed 15 tumors originally diagnosed as mWT (mWT-like tumors), 2 of which had concurrent MECs. We looked for the CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion transcripts and performed immunohistochemistry for p63 and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the MAML2 split. To localize MAML2 split-positive cells at the cellular level, whole tumor tissue sections were digitalized (whole-slide imaging [WSI]). The CRTC1-MAML2, but not CRTC3-MAML2 was detected in 5/15 mWT-like tumors. FISH-WSI results showed that all epithelial cells harbored the MAML2 split in fusion-positive mWT-like tumors and were totally negative in fusion-negative mWT-like tumors. A review of the hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides showed that morphology of the "metaplastic" epithelium was virtually indistinguishable between fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors. However, oncocytic bilayered tumor epithelium, characteristic to typical WT, was always found somewhere in the fusion-negative tumors but not in the fusion-positive tumors. This distinguishing histologic finding enabled 5 pathologists to easily differentiate the 2 tumor groups with 100% accuracy. The age and sex distribution of fusion-positive mWT-like tumor cases was similar to that of fusion-positive MEC cases and significantly different from those of fusion-negative mWT-like tumor and typical WT cases. In addition, only fusion-positive mWT-like tumors possessed concurrent low-grade MECs. In conclusion, a subset of mWT-like tumors were positive for the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion and had many features that are more in accord with MEC than with WT. The term Warthin-like MEC should be considered for fusion-positive mWT-like tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Int Med Res
                J Int Med Res
                IMR
                spimr
                The Journal of International Medical Research
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0300-0605
                1473-2300
                July 2022
                25 July 2022
                : 50
                : 7
                : 03000605221101329
                Affiliations
                [1-03000605221101329]Department of Pathology, Anyang Tumour Hospital, The Affiliated Anyang Tumour Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Anyang, Henan, China
                Author notes
                [*]Ruixue Lei, Department of Pathology, Anyang Tumour Hospital, The Affiliated Anyang Tumour Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Huanbin North Road, Anyang 455000, Henan, China. E-mail: 511396578@ 123456qq.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1802-6589
                Article
                10.1177_03000605221101329
                10.1177/03000605221101329
                9340346
                35879827
                9bdef170-e3af-4dc2-8c3d-b386539ae4d4
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 23 January 2022
                : 29 April 2022
                Categories
                Case Reports
                Custom metadata
                ts2

                warthin’s tumour,mucoepidermoid carcinoma,parotid neoplasm,fluorescence in situ hybridization,maml2,break-apart probes

                Comments

                Comment on this article