13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a 1-year follow-up : Retzius-sparing RARP improves UC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d6322130e170">To evaluate the impact of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (posterior approach) on early recovery of urinary continence (UC) compared to the conventional approach (anterior approach) for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          BJU
          BJU International
          BJU Int
          Wiley
          14644096
          November 2020
          November 2020
          August 17 2020
          : 126
          : 5
          : 633-640
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Urology; Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital; Medical School of Nanjing University; Nanjing China
          [2 ]Institute of Urology; Nanjing University; Nanjing China
          [3 ]School of Artificial Intelligence; Nanjing University; Nanjing China
          [4 ]Department of Urology; San Giovanni Battista Hospital; Città della Salute e della Scienza; University of Turin; Turin Italy
          [5 ]University of Minnesota Medical School; Minneapolis MN USA
          Article
          10.1111/bju.15195
          32741099
          9c23f0a5-a7c9-4cb5-ba47-f16ba6344b2f
          © 2020

          http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

          http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article