3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Time Intervals Between Prior Cervical Conization and Posterior Hysterectomy Influence Postoperative Infection in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study was conducted to observe the influence of different time intervals between prior cervical conization and posterior hysterectomy on postoperative infection in female patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer.

          Material/Methods

          Medical records of 170 patients who underwent hysterectomy following cervical conization between November 2010 and September 2016 at the Zhenjiang 4 th Hospital were reviewed. According to the interval between hysterectomy and cervical conization, patients were classified into 1–2-week, 4–5-week, and 6-week groups. The outcomes of 46 patients who underwent conization with iodoform gauze inside the vagina were observed.

          Results

          The total postoperative infection rate after hysterectomy was 25.3% (43/170). The expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in the cervical secretions and tissues were found to gradually increase, peaking at 2 weeks after conization, then significantly decreasing 3–6 weeks onwards. Compared with the 1–2-week group, the 4–5-week and 6-week groups exhibited significantly lower infection rates (2/42, 4.8%, 4–5-week group; 0%, 0/33, 6-week group; vs. 41/95, 43.2%, 1–2-week group; p<0.001). In the 1–2-week group in particular, the postoperative infection rate after laparoscopic hysterectomy was significantly higher than the rate after abdominal hysterectomy (21/35, 60% vs. 20/60, 33%, p=0.0177). In addition, the vaginal and cervical wound infection rates after conization in patients treated with iodoform were significantly lower than the rates in those without iodoform treatment (p<0.05).

          Conclusions

          Hysterectomy should be performed at least 4 weeks after conization. Treatment with iodoform would be beneficial.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

          A group of 47 experts representing 23 professional societies, national and international health organizations, and federal agencies met in Bethesda, MD, September 14-15, 2012, to revise the 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Consensus Guidelines. The group's goal was to provide revised evidence-based consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) following adoption of cervical cancer screening guidelines incorporating longer screening intervals and co-testing. In addition to literature review, data from almost 1.4 million women in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Plan provided evidence on risk after abnormal tests. Where data were available, guidelines prescribed similar management for women with similar risks for CIN 3, AIS, and cancer. Most prior guidelines were reaffirmed. Examples of updates include: Human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results are followed with co-testing at 3 years before return to routine screening and are not sufficient for exiting women from screening at age 65 years; women aged 21-24 years need less invasive management, especially for minor abnormalities; postcolposcopy management strategies incorporate co-testing; endocervical sampling reported as CIN 1 should be managed as CIN 1; unsatisfactory cytology should be repeated in most circumstances, even when HPV results from co-testing are known, while most cases of negative cytology with absent or insufficient endocervical cells or transformation zone component can be managed without intensive follow-up.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ.

            To provide updated consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). A group of 146 experts including representatives from 29 professional organizations, federal agencies, and national and international health organizations met on September 18-19, 2006, in Bethesda, MD, to develop the guidelines. MAJOR CHANGES IN THE GUIDELINES: The management of women with CIN grade 1 (CIN 1) has been modified significantly. In the earlier guidelines, management depended on whether the colposcopic examination was satisfactory and treatment using ablative or excisional methods was acceptable for women with CIN 1. In the new guidelines, cytological follow-up is the only recommended management option, regardless of whether the colposcopic examination is satisfactory, for women with CIN 1 who have a low-grade referral cervical cytology. Treatment of CIN 1 is particularly discouraged in adolescents. The basic management of women in the general population with CIN 2,3 underwent only minor modifications, but options for the conservative management of adolescents with CIN 2,3 have been expanded. Moreover, management recommendations for women with biopsy-confirmed AIS are now included. Updated evidenced-based guidelines have been developed for the management of women with CIN or AIS. These guidelines reflect recent changes in our understanding of human papillomavirus-associated diseases of the cervix and the potential impact of treatment on future pregnancies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.

              Use of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions is increasing. Using the most recent, available nationwide data, we examined clinical outcomes, safety, and cost of robotic compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Med Sci Monit
                Med. Sci. Monit
                Medical Science Monitor
                Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
                International Scientific Literature, Inc.
                1234-1010
                1643-3750
                2018
                14 December 2018
                : 24
                : 9063-9072
                Affiliations
                Department of Gynecology, Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Zhenjiang 4 th Hospital, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, P.R. China
                Author notes
                Corresponding Authors: Xiaolan Zhu, e-mail: yinxmtg@ 123456163.com , Wenlin Xu, e-mail: e-mail: xwl0806@ 123456163.com
                [A]

                Study Design

                [B]

                Data Collection

                [C]

                Statistical Analysis

                [D]

                Data Interpretation

                [E]

                Manuscript Preparation

                [F]

                Literature Search

                [G]

                Funds Collection

                Article
                911892
                10.12659/MSM.911892
                6302663
                30547901
                9c28abf7-5570-47e6-9f6b-c78af7b58764
                © Med Sci Monit, 2018

                This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

                History
                : 02 July 2018
                : 01 November 2018
                Categories
                Clinical Research

                conization,hysterectomy,postoperative care
                conization, hysterectomy, postoperative care

                Comments

                Comment on this article