12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Eradication of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells by Targeting Glycosylated PD-L1

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p id="P3">Protein glycosylation provides proteomic diversity in regulating protein localization, stability and activity; it remains largely unknown whether the sugar moiety contributes to immunosuppression. In the study of immune receptor glycosylation, we showed EGF induces PD-L1 and receptor programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) interaction, requiring β-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase (B3GNT3) expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Downregulation of B3GNT3 enhances cytotoxic T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. A monoclonal antibody targeting glycosylated PD-L1 (gPD-L1) blocks PD-L1/PD-1 interaction and promotes PD-L1 internalization and degradation. In addition to immune reactivation, drug-conjugated gPD-L1 antibody induces potent cell-killing effect as well as bystander-killing effect on adjacent cancer cells lacking PD-L1 expression without any detectable toxicity. Our work suggests targeting protein glycosylation as a potential strategy to enhance immune checkpoint therapy. </p><p id="P4">Li et al. show that glycosylation of PD-L1 is essential for PD-L1/PD-1 interaction and immunosuppression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). They generate a glycosylation-specific antibody that induces PD-L1 internalization and an antibody-drug conjugate with potent anti-tumor activities in TNBC models. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cancer Cell
          Cancer Cell
          Elsevier BV
          15356108
          February 2018
          February 2018
          : 33
          : 2
          : 187-201.e10
          Article
          10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.009
          5824730
          29438695
          9cf19cae-163b-496e-9f54-ebf002583f2a
          © 2018

          http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article