2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this article, we develop the founding elements of the concept of Communities of Practice by elaborating on the learning processes happening at the heart of such communities. In particular, we provide a consistent perspective on the notions of knowledge, knowing and knowledge sharing that is compatible with the essence of this concept – that learning entails an investment of identity and a social formation of a person. We do so by drawing richly from the work of Michael Polanyi and his conception of personal knowledge, and thereby we clarify the scope of Communities of Practice and offer a number of new insights into how to make such social structures perform well in professional settings. The conceptual discussion is substantiated by findings of a qualitative empirical study in the UK National Health Service. As a result, the process of ‘thinking together’ is conceptualized as a key part of meaningful Communities of Practice where people mutually guide each other through their understandings of the same problems in their area of mutual interest, and this way indirectly share tacit knowledge. The collaborative learning process of ‘thinking together’, we argue, is what essentially brings Communities of Practice to life and not the other way round.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An exploratory study of knowledge brokering in hospital settings: facilitating knowledge sharing and learning for patient safety?

          This paper reports on an exploratory study of intra-organisational knowledge brokers working within three large acute hospitals in the English National Health Services. Knowledge brokering is promoted as a strategy for supporting knowledge sharing and learning in healthcare, especially in the diffusion of research evidence into practice. Less attention has been given to brokers who support knowledge sharing and learning within healthcare organisations. With specific reference to the need for learning around patient safety, this paper focuses on the structural position and role of four types of intra-organisational brokers. Through ethnographic research it examines how variations in formal role, location and relationships shape how they share and support the use of knowledge across organisational and occupational boundaries. It suggests those occupying hybrid organisational roles, such as clinical-managers, are often best positioned to support knowledge sharing and learning because of their 'ambassadorial' type position and legitimacy to participate in multiple communities through dual-directed relationships. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An online community of practice to support evidence-based physiotherapy practice in manual therapy.

            The purpose of this study was to explore how a community of practice promoted the creation and sharing of new knowledge in evidence-based manual therapy using Wenger's constructs of mutual engagement, joint enterprise, and shared repertoire as a theoretical framework.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Achieving evidence-based nursing practice: impact of the Caledonian Development Model.

              To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice. The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college. Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months. Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach. Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient. Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Hum Relat
                Hum Relat
                HUM
                sphum
                Human Relations; Studies towards the Integration of the Social Sciences
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0018-7267
                25 August 2016
                April 2017
                : 70
                : 4
                : 389-409
                Affiliations
                [1-0018726716661040]University of Strathclyde, UK, igor.pyrko@ 123456strath.ac.uk
                [2-0018726716661040]University of Strathclyde, UK, viktor.dorfler@ 123456strath.ac.uk
                [3-0018726716661040]University of Strathclyde, UK, colin.eden@ 123456strath.ac.uk
                Author notes
                [*]Igor Pyrko, Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, 130 Rottenrow, Sir William Duncan Wing, Glasgow G4 0GE, UK. Email: igor.pyrko@ 123456strath.ac.uk
                Article
                10.1177_0018726716661040
                10.1177/0018726716661040
                5305036
                28232754
                9dafd11e-da40-474f-b2c5-4d21ce4c4c7e
                © The Author(s) 2016

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                communities of practice,knowing,knowledge sharing,personal knowledge

                Comments

                Comment on this article