5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Guidelines for the Assessment Process (GAP): A Proposal for Discussion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary: Current existing or proposed standards and guidelines in the field of psychological assessment are confined to psychological tests and psychological testing. But tests constitute only one category of psychological assessment procedures, and testing is only one of many available strategies or classes of actions in the course of the assessment process. Tests and testing are closely linked to a certain approach to psychological assessment, i. e., the psychometric one. This is one reason why it is relatively easy to formulate and establish standards or guidelines in the case of psychological tests and testing. The much more comprehensive assessment process is an indispensable part of any approach to psychological assessment, even of those that do not use psychometric tests. This makes the formulation of guidelines for the assessment process an ambitious and very difficult enterprise. But it can be done, at least at the level of recommendations that could help the assessor to cope with the complexities and demands of assessment processes in various contexts of psychological assessment. The European Association of Psychological Assessment (EAPA) decided to sponsor the development of Guidelines for the Assessment Process (GAP), setting up a Task Force for this specific purpose. The GAP introduced in this paper are intended as a first proposal to initiate a broad discussion about how to improve the practice of psychological assessment and the education and training of psychological assessors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Testing Practices in European Countries

          Summary: Tests constitute one of the technological tools most frequently used by psychologists in their professional practice. Like any other scientific technology, tests can be used both in appropriate and inappropriate ways. Currently, various institutions, both national and international, are developing projects and activities aimed at improving testing practices. In Europe, the Task Force on Tests and Testing created by the European Federation of Professional Psychologists' Associations (EFPPA) designed a questionnaire to sample the opinions of professional psychologists about tests and testing in order to help in making the right decisions for improving testing practices in Europe. This paper presents the results obtained using the EFPPA Questionnaire. A sample of 3,455 Spanish, 2,407 English, 2,079 Dutch, 321 Slovenian, 218 Croatian, and 210 Belgian psychologists responded to the questionnaire. In general, European psychologists show a positive attitude toward tests and testing, while at the same time expressing the need for institutions to adopt a more active role in promoting good testing practices. Results show that the tests most frequently used are intelligence tests, personality questionnaires, and depression scales. Finally, the results are analyzed in detail, and some possible measures for improving testing practices in Europe are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Standards for the Development and Use of Tests: The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

            Summary: This paper discusses the changes in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing between the 1985 and 1999 versions, along with the developments in testing that brought about these changes. In addition, some thoughts are presented about the future of the 1999 Standards .
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A normative-prescriptive view on clinical psychodiagnostic decision making

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jpa
                European Journal of Psychological Assessment
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1015-5759
                September 2001
                : 17
                : 3
                : 187-200
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Autonoma University of Madrid, Spain
                [ 2 ] University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] University of Malaga, Spain
                [ 4 ] RWTH Aachen, Germany
                [ 5 ] University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ 6 ] University of Dresden, Germany
                [ 7 ] Free University of Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                Fernández-Ballesteros R., Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, +34 91 397-5181 +34 91 397-5215 r.fballesteros@ 123456uam.es
                Article
                jpa1703187
                10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.187
                9db32ea2-aed0-497b-95fd-f92999a0822e
                Copyright @ 2001
                History
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General behavioral science
                guidelines,quality control,standards,Assessment process,evaluation

                Comments

                Comment on this article