6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Police Call-takers' First Substantive Question Projects the Outcome of the Call

      1 , 2
      Applied Linguistics
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Police call-takers need to gather as much data as is needed, as quickly as possible, to determine whether and what action should be taken. On analysing 514 calls to a UK centre handling emergency (999) and non-emergency (101) calls, we find that the call-taker’s first substantive question already carries a diagnosis of the merits of the caller's case, and an implication of the call's likely outcome. Such questions come principally in four formats. On a gradient of increasing scepticism, these are requests for the caller's location (which are treated as indicating that police action will be taken); open-ended requests for further information (treated as neutral); and queries of the relevance of the incident or legitimacy of the caller, and reformulations of the caller's reason for calling (both projecting upcoming refusal of police action). We discuss the implications of this gradient for understanding how the call-takers manage their institutional goals. Data are in British English.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Applied Linguistics
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0142-6001
                1477-450X
                October 2020
                October 01 2020
                March 11 2019
                October 2020
                October 01 2020
                March 11 2019
                : 41
                : 5
                : 640-661
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Keele University
                [2 ]Loughborough University
                Article
                10.1093/applin/amz002
                9f46e4b4-0ff6-4c81-91fa-35f5730b0af0
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article