23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis in glioblastoma-From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic perspectives.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cellular stress induced by the accumulation of misfolded proteins at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a central feature of secretory cells and is observed in many tissues in various diseases, including cancer, diabetes, obesity, and neurodegenerative disorders. Cellular adaptation to ER stress is achieved by the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), an integrated signal transduction pathway that transmits information about the protein folding status at the ER to the cytosol and nucleus to restore proteostasis. In the past decade, ER stress has emerged as a major pathway in remodeling gene expression programs that either prevent transformation or provide selective advantage in cancer cells. Controlled by the formation of a dynamic scaffold onto which many regulatory components assemble, UPR signaling is a highly regulated process that leads to an integrated reprogramming of the cell. In this Review, we provide an overview of the regulatory mechanisms underlying UPR signaling and how this pathway modulates cancer progression, particularly the aggressiveness and chemotherapeutic resistance exhibited by glioblastoma, a form of brain cancer. We also discuss the emerging cross-talk between the UPR and related metabolic processes to ensure maintenance of proteostasis, and we highlight possible therapeutic opportunities for targeting the pathway with small molecules.

          Related collections

          Most cited references155

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes.

          Cancers arise owing to mutations in a subset of genes that confer growth advantage. The availability of the human genome sequence led us to propose that systematic resequencing of cancer genomes for mutations would lead to the discovery of many additional cancer genes. Here we report more than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases (Mb) of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers. There was substantial variation in the number and pattern of mutations in individual cancers reflecting different exposures, DNA repair defects and cellular origins. Most somatic mutations are likely to be 'passengers' that do not contribute to oncogenesis. However, there was evidence for 'driver' mutations contributing to the development of the cancers studied in approximately 120 genes. Systematic sequencing of cancer genomes therefore reveals the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            TLR activation of the transcription factor XBP1 regulates innate immune responses in macrophages.

            Sensors of pathogens, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), detect microbes to activate transcriptional programs that orchestrate adaptive responses to specific insults. Here we report that TLR4 and TLR2 specifically activated the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress sensor kinase IRE1alpha and its downstream target, the transcription factor XBP1. Previously described ER-stress target genes of XBP1 were not induced by TLR signaling. Instead, TLR-activated XBP1 was required for optimal and sustained production of proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages. Consistent with that finding, activation of IRE1alpha by ER stress acted in synergy with TLR activation for cytokine production. Moreover, XBP1 deficiency resulted in a much greater bacterial burden in mice infected with the TLR2-activating human intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis. Our findings identify an unsuspected critical function for XBP1 in mammalian host defenses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              XBP1 Promotes Triple Negative Breast Cancer By Controlling the HIF1 α Pathway

              Cancer cells induce a set of adaptive response pathways to survive in the face of stressors due to inadequate vascularization 1 . One such adaptive pathway is the unfolded protein (UPR) or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response mediated in part by the ER-localized transmembrane sensor IRE1 2 and its substrate XBP1 3 . Previous studies report UPR activation in various human tumors 4-6 , but XBP1's role in cancer progression in mammary epithelial cells is largely unknown. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), a form of breast cancer in which tumor cells do not express the genes for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2/neu, is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options 7, 8 . Here, we report that XBP1 is activated in TNBC and plays a pivotal role in the tumorigenicity and progression of this human breast cancer subtype. In breast cancer cell line models, depletion of XBP1 inhibited tumor growth and tumor relapse and reduced the CD44high/CD24low population. Hypoxia-inducing factor (HIF)1α is known to be hyperactivated in TNBCs 9, 10 . Genome-wide mapping of the XBP1 transcriptional regulatory network revealed that XBP1 drives TNBC tumorigenicity by assembling a transcriptional complex with HIF1α that regulates the expression of HIF1α targets via the recruitment of RNA polymerase II. Analysis of independent cohorts of patients with TNBC revealed a specific XBP1 gene expression signature that was highly correlated with HIF1α and hypoxia-driven signatures and that strongly associated with poor prognosis. Our findings reveal a key function for the XBP1 branch of the UPR in TNBC and imply that targeting this pathway may offer alternative treatment strategies for this aggressive subtype of breast cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Signal
                Science signaling
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                1937-9145
                1945-0877
                Mar 14 2017
                : 10
                : 470
                Affiliations
                [1 ] INSERM U1242, Chemistry, Oncogenesis, Stress Signaling, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes 35000, France.
                [2 ] Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, Rennes 35042, France.
                [3 ] Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes 35000, France.
                [4 ] Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Neuroscience Institute, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
                [5 ] Center for Geroscience, Brain Health and Metabolism, Santiago, Chile.
                [6 ] Program of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Molecular Studies of the Cell, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Chile, 1027 Independencia, P.O. Box 70086, Santiago, Chile.
                [7 ] Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA 94945, USA.
                [8 ] Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [9 ] INSERM U1242, Chemistry, Oncogenesis, Stress Signaling, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes 35000, France. eric.chevet@inserm.fr.
                Article
                10/470/eaal2323
                10.1126/scisignal.aal2323
                28292956
                9f47ad32-13ae-425b-a9ad-c3f2cc7d3d9f
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article