1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Perimortem or Postmortem Bone Fractures? An Experimental Study of Fracture Patterns in Deer Femora

      Journal of Forensic Sciences
      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The determination of perimortem trauma is important for forensic anthropologists. Characteristics of bone fractures such as sharp edges, presence of fracture lines, the shape of the broken ends, fracture surface morphology, fracture angle on the Z-axis, and butterfly fractures are said to differentiate perimortem from postmortem trauma. A Drop Weight Impact Test Machine was used to break 76 deer femora of various ages since death. The results of this study suggest that the characteristics listed above are unreliable at differentiating a perimortem fracture from a postmortem fracture in a forensic case. There are, however, statistically significant differences between fresh bones broken less than 4 days old and dry bones broken 44 days or 1 year old after death.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Vertebrate Taphonomy

          R. Lyman (1994)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Breakage patterns of human long bones

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?: "Wolff's law" and bone functional adaptation.

              "Wolff's law" is a concept that has sometimes been misrepresented, and frequently misunderstood, in the anthropological literature. Although it was originally formulated in a strict mathematical sense that has since been discredited, the more general concept of "bone functional adaptation" to mechanical loading (a designation that should probably replace "Wolff's law") is supported by much experimental and observational data. Objections raised to earlier studies of bone functional adaptation have largely been addressed by more recent and better-controlled studies. While the bone morphological response to mechanical strains is reduced in adults relative to juveniles, claims that adult morphology reflects only juvenile loadings are greatly exaggerated. Similarly, while there are important genetic influences on bone development and on the nature of bone's response to mechanical loading, variations in loadings themselves are equally if not more important in determining variations in morphology, especially in comparisons between closely related individuals or species. The correspondence between bone strain patterns and bone structure is variable, depending on skeletal location and the general mechanical environment (e.g., distal vs. proximal limb elements, cursorial vs. noncursorial animals), so that mechanical/behavioral inferences based on structure alone should be limited to corresponding skeletal regions and animals with similar basic mechanical designs. Within such comparisons, traditional geometric parameters (such as second moments of area and section moduli) still give the best available estimates of in vivo mechanical competence. Thus, when employed with appropriate caution, these features may be used to reconstruct mechanical loadings and behavioral differences within and between past populations. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Forensic Sciences
                J Forensic Sci
                Wiley-Blackwell
                0022-1198
                1556-4029
                January 2008
                January 2008
                : 53
                : 1
                : 69-72
                Article
                10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00593.x
                18005007
                9fb70dca-95a3-4f89-98c0-eb91e437c81b
                © 2008

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article