17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antimicrobial Resistance in Horses

      editorial
      1 , * , 2 , *
      Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
      MDPI

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an increasingly recognized global public health threat to the modern health-care system that could hamper the control and treatment of infectious diseases [1]. Microorganisms may serve as a reservoir for AMR in all ecological niches; therefore, a “one health” coordinated multisectorial approach is desired to investigate and address this warning phenomenon [2]. This approach appears to be a winning strategy to combat and reduce the burden of AMR, but it requires combined forces and resources that are consistently and effectively implemented by both human and veterinary health professionals [1]. Horses are among the most central animals in human history; they have been used in wars, as a means of transport, and even facilitated work in mines. Since then, the rate of contact between domesticated horses and humans has steadily increased. Nowadays, horses play an important role as sport animals and in animal-assisted therapy. Due to these close human-horse interactions, the adequate detection of infectious diseases and AMR that may affect both humans and horses is crucial, especially in cases of highly transmissible diseases [3]. Numerous important antibiotic-resistant zoonotic pathogens have been reported from horses, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella. These reports have attracted increasing attention to the threat of AMR in horses [4]. During the last two decades, researchers have generated a vast amount of information on the importance of MRSA in horses, which has been recognized as an occupational risk for veterinary professionals [5]. MRSA outbreaks affecting both horses and personnel were reported from different geographic locations and reciprocal animal-personnel transmission of infections was demonstrated. Furthermore, it was previously demonstrated that on-admission MRSA colonization in horses is a risk factor to develop MRSA infection [6]. In spite of the accumulating data on the prevalence, risk factors for colonization, and resistance genes of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, data that links between resistant gram-negative gut colonization and equine health is still lacking. The occurrence of AMR pathogens causing infections in equine populations increases concern over the issue of antimicrobial stewardship that involves the judicious use of antimicrobials balanced with the requirement to treat the presenting clinical condition [7]. The challenges in equine practice include the size and value of the patient, correct and timely pathogen identification, and its susceptibility profile, together with the limited number of drugs and their indiscriminate use by clients [7]. Therefore, it is crucial to promote antimicrobial stewardship, not just among academics, public health personnel, and specialists, but also among primary care equine clinicians and equine caretakers [8]. Another important aspect of AMR in horses is the proper use of critically important antibiotics (CIA) such as fluoroquinolones, third and fourth generation cephalosporins, and macrolides. The prophylactic use of macrolide with rifampin in foals suspected to be infected with Rhodococcus equi has been shown to promote MDR in both R. equi and in gut commensals, increasing the risk of environmental shedding [9]. Disease-specific practice guidelines are required to reduce CIA use for skin, respiratory, and postsurgical infections in equine medicine [10]. Therefore, as equine practitioners and researchers, we should pay attention to the use of CIAs in equine patients treatment [1]. The aim of this special issue on AMR in horses was to collect the most recent data on the prevalence, risk factors, and characterization of different MDR pathogens in different equine cohorts from various countries. Data from Israel reports on colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in foals on admission and in the hospital setting. ESBL colonization in neonatal foals was associated with umbilical infection and ampicillin treatment during hospitalization [11]. In Israel, risk factors for ESBL-E shedding in farm horses included horses’ breed, sex, and previous antibiotic treatment [12]. In a similar cohort of healthy horses from Canada, the number of staff members and equestrian event participation were identified as risk factors for MDR E. coli shedding [13]. In a study from Japan, healthy racehorses were reported to be colonized with MDR ESBL/AmpC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae [14]. Another unique horse population that AMR pathogens were recovered from was equine destined for human consumption in Spain, in which both nasal and fecal carriage of a highly virulent MRSA was detected [15]. In addition, ESBL-producing Enterobacteriacae pathogens were also reported as causative agents of clinical infections in horses. In France, the percentages of MDR Staphylococcus aureus and MDR Enterobacter spp. strains causing clinical infections increased significantly during a 3-year period [16]. In Austria, MDRKlebsiella species were isolated from clinical samples, displaying a variety of resistance and virulence genes [17]. In a clinical bacterial collection from Texas-A&M, ESBL-producing Enterobacteriacae were reported with the first report of E. coli ST1308 in horses [18]. We believe that the new data reported here is highly relevant from a ‘’one health’’ perspective; it will help to improve our knowledge related to the issue of AMR worldwide and will assist in improving control measures, optimize appropriate therapy, and will encourage further studies in this important field.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine: An Overview

          Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents one of the most important human- and animal health-threatening issues worldwide. Bacterial capability to face antimicrobial compounds is an ancient feature, enabling bacterial survival over time and the dynamic surrounding. Moreover, bacteria make use of their evolutionary machinery to adapt to the selective pressure exerted by antibiotic treatments, resulting in reduced efficacy of the therapeutic intervention against human and animal infections. The mechanisms responsible for both innate and acquired AMR are thoroughly investigated. Commonly, AMR traits are included in mobilizable genetic elements enabling the homogeneous diffusion of the AMR traits pool between the ecosystems of diverse sectors, such as human medicine, veterinary medicine, and the environment. Thus, a coordinated multisectoral approach, such as One-Health, provides a detailed comprehensive picture of the AMR onset and diffusion. Following a general revision of the molecular mechanisms responsible for both innate and acquired AMR, the present manuscript focuses on reviewing the contribution of veterinary medicine to the overall issue of AMR. The main sources of AMR amenable to veterinary medicine are described, driving the attention towards the indissoluble cross-talk existing between the diverse ecosystems and sectors and their cumulative cooperation to this warning phenomenon.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Veterinary Personnel

            Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a problematic pathogen in human medicine and appears to be an emerging problem in veterinary medicine. Historically, hospital-associated MRSA infections have predominated in humans and contributed to significant illness and death ( 1 – 4 ). Recently, a shift in the epidemiology of MRSA infection has been documented, whereby community-associated (CA)-MRSA infections have become more common ( 5 – 9 ). CA-MRSA may arise from hospital-origin clones that are carried into the community and then transmitted between persons or from de novo development of resistance through acquisition of resistance factors (mecA) by methicillin-sensitive strains of S. aureus ( 10 ). Asymptomatic colonization with MRSA represents a major risk factor for infection or for transmission among persons within hospitals or the community ( 11 ). While CA-MRSA infections are becoming more widely reported, the prevalence of MRSA carriage overall remains low in healthy persons in the community ( 6 , 12 – 14 ). Reported prevalence of MRSA colonization in the community has been variable; the study population has a major effect on MRSA carriage rates. In the absence of recognized risk factors, the prevalence of colonization tends to be low. In a 2003 study, Salgado et al. identified MRSA colonization in 1.3% of persons overall but in only 0.2% of persons with no identified healthcare-associated risk factors ( 12 ). A study from Switzerland reported MRSA colonization in 0.09% of persons at the time of hospital admission ( 6 ). The prevalence of MRSA carriage was 0.3% in a 2005 study that Nulens et al. conducted at a European conference for physicians and others involved in clinical microbiology and infectious disease ( 15 ). MRSA infection and colonization have been reported in horses, dogs, cats, birds, and cattle ( 16 – 19 ). Transmission of MRSA between animals and humans has been reported ( 20 – 23 ) as have human MRSA infections from animal contact ( 16 , 21 , 24 ). Recent studies have identified high colonization rates in humans who have close contact with animals. MRSA colonization of persons who work with horses in Canada and the United States was 13% (14/107); on every farm where MRSA was identified in a horse, at least 1 person was colonized ( 25 ). In another study, 10 (9.7%) of 103 tested veterinary hospital personnel in a large-animal clinic were colonized with MRSA, and clinical skin infections were reported in 3 ( 26 ). Isolates from horses and humans in each of these studies were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and were typed as Canadian epidemic MRSA (CMRSA)-5 (ST8:MRSA:SCCmecIV, also known as USA500), which suggests transmission between horses and humans ( 27 ). A study at a small-animal referral hospital in the United Kingdom reported MRSA colonization in 17.9% of veterinary personnel. Investigation of clinical infection in 5 dogs and 3 cats found colonization in 14 (16%) of 88 household contacts or veterinary personnel ( 28 ). In all of the above reports, a screening bias for MRSA colonization may have been present if an outbreak had been ongoing in the population. Whether these results would accurately reflect the prevalence of MRSA in the general veterinary population, and therefore the occupational risk of MRSA exposure for veterinarians, is unclear. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of MRSA colonization in veterinary personnel attending an international veterinary conference and to characterize recovered MRSA isolates. Materials and Methods Study Population This study was performed at the annual American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Forum held in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June 3–5, 2005. The conference was attended by 3,240 persons: 2,744 practicing veterinarians, 354 technicians, and 142 other veterinary personnel involved in industry or research. Most (86%) attendees were from the United States; however, 43 other countries were represented. An information and sampling booth attended by the investigators was used to enroll adult volunteers; all attendees were eligible. This study was approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board. Sample Collection Participants provided a single nasal swab sample each, which they collected themselves according to instructions to insert a cotton-tipped swab ≈1 cm into each nostril. The swabs were placed in liquid Stuart medium and maintained at 4°C until processing. Participants completed a brief questionnaire designed to identify potential risk factors for MRSA colonization: nationality, occupational position, type of clinical practice, veterinary patient contact, known exposure to MRSA in veterinary practice, previous hospitalization (within 30 days), previous MRSA infection, and residence with a healthcare worker. Practice types were small-animal (primarily dogs and cats), large-animal (primarily horses but also ruminants), and mixed (combination of large and small animals). We defined CA-MRSA colonization as MRSA isolation from a person with no history of healthcare-associated risk factors. MRSA Identification, Characterization, and Typing Swabs were placed into 2 mL of enrichment broth consisting of 10 g/L Tryptone T (Oxoid Inc., Nepean, Ontario, Canada), 75 g/L sodium chloride, 10 g/L mannitol, and 2.5 g/L yeast extract and incubated for 24 h at 35°C. Approximately 100 µL of broth was spread onto mannitol-salt agar with 10 g/L cefoxitin and incubated at 35°C for 48 h. Isolates were identified as S. aureus on the basis of colony morphologic features, gram-positive stain, catalase-positive reaction, positive tube coagulase test result, and positive latex agglutination test result (Pastorex Staph Plus, Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Methicillin-resistance was confirmed by demonstration of penicillin binding protein 2a with a latex agglutination antibody screening kit (Denka Seinken Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines ( 29 ); mupirocin MIC was determined by using E-Test gradient strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). MRSA isolates were typed by SmaI PFGE and categorized as different CMRSA types as described previously ( 8 ). Real-time PCR was used to detect the lukF and lukS components of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene previously described ( 30 ). Statistical Analysis Categorical comparisons were performed using χ2 analysis or Fisher exact test. A p value 1 sampling site to further characterize the prevalence of MRSA colonization in veterinary personnel. As MRSA expands into the community, changes in its epidemiology are inevitable. The lives of humans and animals, and their microflora, are closely intertwined. MRSA is now a pathogen of domestic animals that can be transmitted between animals and humans. Accordingly, further scrutiny of the roles of animals in MRSA infection and colonization is required. While occupational and recreational exposure to horses may be a risk factor for MRSA colonization, the effect of routine contact with household pets on the global epidemiology of MRSA is still unknown.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses at a veterinary teaching hospital: frequency, characterization, and association with clinical disease.

              Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an emerging equine pathogen. To attempt to control nosocomial and zoonotic transmission, an MRSA screening program was established for all horses admitted to the Ontario Veterinary College Veterinary Teaching Hospital, whereby nasal screening swabs were collected at admission, weekly during hospitalization, and at discharge. MRSA was isolated from 120 (5.3%) of 2,283 horses: 61 (50.8%) at the time of admission, 53 (44.2%) during hospitalization, and 6 from which the origin was unclear because an admission swab had not been collected. Clinical infections attributable to MRSA were present or developed in 14 (11.7%) of 120 horses. The overall rate of community-associated colonization was 27 per 1,000 admissions. Horses colonized at admission were more likely to develop clinical MRSA infection than those not colonized at admission (OR 38.9, 95% CI 9.49 160, P < 0.0001). The overall nosocomial MRSA colonization incidence rate was 23 per 1,000 admissions. The incidence rate of nosocomial MRSA infection was at the rate of 1.8 per 1,000 admissions, with an incidence density of 0.88 per 1,000 patient days. Administration of ceftiofur or aminoglycosides during hospitalization was the only risk factor associated with nosocomial MRSA colonization. MRSA screening of horses admitted to a veterinary hospital was useful for identification of community-associated and nosocomial colonization and infection, and for monitoring of infection control practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                09 July 2020
                July 2020
                : 10
                : 7
                : 1161
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Biology and the Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-6822
                Article
                animals-10-01161
                10.3390/ani10071161
                7401552
                32659916
                9ffb71d4-8812-4023-932a-fef9ad3e670c
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 June 2020
                : 25 June 2020
                Categories
                Editorial

                Comments

                Comment on this article