0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pearls of Elschnig

      research-article
      , OD, PhD, , OD, MAA, , OD, MS
      Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
      PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PRESENTATION A 72-year-old Hispanic male patient presented with a chief complaint of blurred near vision without spectacles. He had a medical history of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, controlled with medication; an ocular history of chronic uveitis about three decades ago; and a history of cataract surgery and posterior-chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in the left eye seven years back. The patient's visual acuity was correctable to 20/20 in each eye with refraction (bilateral compound hyperopic astigmatism). Extraocular motilities were unrestricted, and confrontation fields were full to finger count. The pupils were reactive to light and no afferent pupil defect (APD) was present. The right pupil was 4 mm and round in dim light, but the left one had a slight vertical elongation, commonly seen in an operated eye. The anterior segment examination revealed deep and quiet anterior chambers; the right iris and lens appeared normal with grade 1 + lenticular nuclear sclerosis (NS). The PCIOL appeared stable and centered in the left eye, but there was a large grape-like mass postero-superiorly to the iris [Figure 1]. Figure 1 Biomicroscopic photograph showing the Elschnig pearls in the left eye. This original image was captured using an iPhone 6 camera mounted with an adapter to a Topcon® slit lamp biomicroscope (Topcon Medical Systems Inc., Oakland NJ). (Tiger Lens is unavailable to provide any information to me other than the website.) Figure 2 Scheimpflug anterior segment reconstructions of right eye (top) and left eye (bottom) captured in the clinic. The large grouping of Elschnig pearls is easily seen in the bottom image. Dilated funduscopic examination revealed healthy optic nerves with normal cupping in both eyes. The maculae were flat and all vessels appeared healthy. The peripheral retinal examination of OD revealed a small ( ∼ 1 mm) horseshoe tear without traction infero-temporally but was unremarkable in OS. The patient was referred for a retinal consultation for the retinal tear in the right eye. Additional assessments showed type 2 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy, pseudophakia with an unusually large presentation of Elschnig pearls in OS. Scheimpflug anterior segment reconstructions were performed using PentacamⓇ (OCULUS Inc., Arlington WA); the iris-lens configurations generated for both eyes are shown in Figure 2. The NS of the right eye is shown in Figure 2(a), and Figure 2(b) shows the mass of cells clumped like a jewel and extending into the anterior chamber. The patient was provided with a new spectacle prescription and instructed to return to the clinic after a year. DISCUSSION Elschnig pearls were once considered to be a rare complication of cataract surgery,[1] and they can be difficult to distinguish epidemiologically from other forms of posterior capsular opacification (PCO). Hence, their precise incidence may not have been correctly reported.[2] There is a small body of literature on the pathogenesis and management of Elschnig pearls,[1,2,3,4,5] and this report may be the first showing a dramatic presentation without any effect on visual acuity. It is conceivable that the impressive size of these pearls is due to a lack of posterior sub-capsular scaffolding to contain the spread of the epithelial cells as seen in typical cases. The nature of this case may have also been influenced by the patient's history of uveitis, or its treatment, 30 years ago.[3] However, we are unaware of any specific postoperative history, and it has been reported that individual variability, rather than inflammation, has the greatest effect on the formation of Elschnig pearls.[4] Financial Support and Sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification.

          Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common long-term complication after cataract surgery. It can be treated by Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, however, this may lead to other complications and laser treatment is not available in large parts of the developing world. Therefore, many studies try to find factors influencing the development of PCO. To summarise the effects of different interventions to inhibit PCO. These include modifications of surgical technique and intraocular lens (IOL) design, implantation of additional devices and pharmacological interventions. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS in January 2007 and reference lists of identified trial reports. We included only prospective, randomised and controlled trials with a follow-up time of at least 12 months. Interventions included modifications in surgical technique explicitly to inhibit PCO, modifications in IOL design (material and geometry), implantation of additional devices, and pharmacological therapy, compared to each other, placebo or standard treatment. Data were extracted and entered into Review Manager. Visual acuity data, PCO score and YAG capsulotomy rates were compared and a meta-analysis was performed when possible. Fifty three studies were included in the review. The review was divided into three parts. (1) Influence of IOL optic material on the development of PCO. Compared to other materials, the meta-analysis of the included studies showed a significantly higher PCO score (overall effect: 12.39 (95% confidence interval: 9.82 to 14.95), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (odds ratio: 8.37 (3.74 to 20.36)) only in hydrogel IOLs. (2) Influence of IOL optic design on the development of PCO. There was a significantly lower PCO score (-8.65 (-10.72 to -6.59), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (0.19 (0.11 to 0.35)) in sharp edged than in round edged IOLs, however, not between 1-piece and 3-piece IOLs. (3) Influence of surgical technique and drugs on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference between different types of intra-/postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment except for treatment with an immunotoxin (MDX-A) leading to a significantly lower PCO rate. Due to the highly significant difference between round and sharp edge IOL optics, IOLs with sharp (posterior) optic edges should be preferred. There is no clear difference between optic materials, except for hydrogel IOLs, that showed more PCO than the other materials. The choice of postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment does not seem to influence PCO development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Natural course of Elschnig pearl formation and disappearance.

            To observe and analyze the daily and weekly changes in morphology and size of Elschnig pearls in eyes with after-cataract.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A randomized controlled trial of peeling and aspiration of Elschnig pearls and neodymium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser capsulotomy.

              To compare surgical peeling and aspiration and neodymium yttrium garnet laser capsulotomy for pearl form of posterior capsule opacification (PCO).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Ophthalmic Vis Res
                J Ophthalmic Vis Res
                JOVR
                Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
                PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
                2008-2010
                2008-322X
                Oct-Dec 2019
                24 October 2019
                : 14
                : 4
                : 525-527
                Affiliations
                1deptUniversity of the Incarnate Word, Rosenberg School of Optometry, TX, USA
                Author notes
                *Brian K Foutch. University of the Incarnate Word, Rosenberg School of Optometry, 9725 Datapoint Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. E-mail: foutch@uiwtx.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-0594
                Article
                10.18502/jovr.v14i4.5469
                6825707
                a0363e75-5804-47f1-9508-a1e8a7e59343
                Copyright © 2019 Foutch et al.

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 25 October 2018
                : 30 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, References: 5, Pages: 3
                Categories
                Photo Essay

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Ophthalmology & Optometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article