0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Providing Emotional Support to Parents and Caregivers of Infants and Toddlers With Visual Impairments

      1 , 2
      Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis

          Background Parents are the primary caregivers of young children. Responsive parent–child relationships and parental support for learning during the earliest years of life are crucial for promoting early child development (ECD). We conducted a global systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of parenting interventions on ECD and parenting outcomes. Methods and findings We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Global Health Library for peer-reviewed, published articles from database inception until November 15, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of parenting interventions delivered during the first 3 years of life that evaluated at least 1 ECD outcome. At least 2 reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed study quality from eligible studies. ECD outcomes included cognitive, language, motor, and socioemotional development, behavior problems, and attachment. Parenting outcomes included parenting knowledge, parenting practices, parent–child interactions, and parental depressive symptoms. We calculated intervention effect sizes as the standardized mean difference (SMD) and estimated pooled effect sizes for each outcome separately using robust variance estimation meta-analytic approaches. We used random-effects meta-regression models to assess potential effect modification by country-income level, child age, intervention content, duration, delivery, setting, and study quality. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018092458 and CRD42018092461). Of the 11,920 articles identified, we included 111 articles representing 102 unique RCTs. Pooled effect sizes indicated positive benefits of parenting interventions on child cognitive development (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.23, 0.40, P < 0.001), language development (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.37, P < 0.001), motor development (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.32, P < 0.001), socioemotional development (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.28, P < 0.001), and attachment (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.40, P < 0.001) and reductions in behavior problems (SMD = −0.13, 95% CI: −0.18 to −0.08, P < 0.001). Positive benefits were also found on parenting knowledge (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.79, P < 0.001), parenting practices (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.44, P < 0.001), and parent–child interactions (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.53, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant reduction in parental depressive symptoms (SMD = −0.07, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.02, P = 0.08). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly greater effects on child cognitive, language, and motor development, and parenting practices in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries; and significantly greater effects on child cognitive development, parenting knowledge, parenting practices, and parent–child interactions for programs that focused on responsive caregiving compared to those that did not. On the other hand, there was no clear evidence of effect modification by child age, intervention duration, delivery, setting, or study risk of bias. Study limitations include considerable unexplained heterogeneity, inadequate reporting of intervention content and implementation, and varying quality of evidence in terms of the conduct of trials and robustness of outcome measures used across studies. Conclusions Parenting interventions for children during the first 3 years of life are effective for improving ECD outcomes and enhancing parenting outcomes across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Increasing implementation of effective and high-quality parenting interventions is needed globally and at scale in order to support parents and enable young children to achieve their full developmental potential. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Joshua Jeong and colleagues study the effectiveness of parenting interventions in children 3 years and younger in promoting early childhood development and parenting outcomes. Why was this study done? Parenting interventions have been underscored as a key strategy for improving early child development (ECD) outcomes. Although there are several existing reviews regarding the effectiveness of parenting interventions for improving ECD outcomes, prior reviews have focused narrowly on select types of parenting interventions, evaluated impacts on single ECD domain outcomes, included studies in either only high-income countries (HICs) or low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and have not adequately explored treatment heterogeneity and potential moderators. What did the researchers do and find? We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 102 randomized controlled trials of parenting interventions for children during the first 3 years of life that were implemented across a total of 33 countries. We found that parenting interventions improved early child cognitive, language, motor, socioemotional development, and attachment and reduced behavior problems. Parenting interventions additionally improved parenting knowledge, parenting practices, and parent–child interactions. However, they did not significantly reduce parental depressive symptoms. We found that parenting interventions had significantly greater effects on child cognitive, language, and motor development and parenting practices in LMICs than HICs (e.g., effect on cognitive development was 3 times greater in LMICs versus HICs). Parenting interventions that included content on responsive caregiving had significantly greater effects on child cognitive development, parenting knowledge, parenting practices, and parent–child interactions than interventions that did not include content on responsive caregiving (e.g., effect on parenting practices was nearly 4 times greater for interventions with responsive caregiving content versus those without responsive caregiving content). We uncovered substantial variation in program content and implementation characteristics across studies and considerable heterogeneity in pooled effect size estimates across nearly all evaluated outcomes. What do these findings mean? To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest and most comprehensive global systematic review and meta-analysis that demonstrates the effectiveness of parenting interventions during the first 3 years of life on a wide range of ECD and parent-level outcomes. Parenting programs are needed globally to enhance parent–child relationships and promote the healthy development of children during the earliest years of life. Future research should unpack the observed variability in program components and implementation features used across parenting interventions and examine their associations with outcomes to inform improved delivery, effectiveness, and scale of parenting interventions for ECD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Parent-to-parent peer support for parents of children with a disability: A mixed method study.

            This paper will report on the findings of a study which investigated the influence of a befriending (parent-to-parent peer support) scheme on parents whose children have a disability or additional need. The scheme operated from an acute children's tertiary setting in the UK.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Building New Dreams

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
                Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
                SAGE Publications
                0145-482X
                1559-1476
                March 2023
                June 13 2023
                March 2023
                : 117
                : 2
                : 175-182
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Special Education, California State University–Northridge, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [2 ]Early Start Program, Special Education Department, Marin County Office of Education, San Rafael, CA, USA
                Article
                10.1177/0145482X231169721
                a0759c83-b3b3-4b5b-b39d-53f2ed96801e
                © 2023

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article