2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A continuum of stomatal responses to water deficits among 17 wine grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vitis vinifera L. cultivars have been previously classified as isohydric, near-isohydric, anisohydric or isohydrodynamic, depending on the study. To test the hypothesis that V. vinifera cultivars' stomatal behaviour can be separated into distinct classes, 17 cultivars grown in a replicated field trial were subjected to three irrigation treatments to manipulate vine water status across multiple years. Predawn (ΨPD) and midday (Ψl) leaf water potential and midday stomatal conductance (gs) were measured regularly throughout several seasons. The relationship of gs to Ψl was best modelled as a sigmoidal function and maximum stomatal conductance (gmax), water status at the onset of stomatal closure (Ψl95), sensitivity of closure (gsensitivity) and water status at the end of closure (Ψl25) were compared. There were no significant differences in gmax among cultivars. Cultivar-specific responses of gs to Ψl were broadly distributed along a continuum based on the relationship between Ψl95 and gsensitivity. Season-long cultivar mean Ψl values were positively related to Ψl25. In general, cultivars responded similarly to one another at high and low water status, but their stomatal behaviour differed at moderate water deficits. The results show that V. vinifera cultivars possess both iso- and anisohydric stomatal behaviours that depend on the intensity of water deficits, and call into question previous classifications assuming a single behaviour.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Funct. Plant Biol.
          Functional plant biology : FPB
          CSIRO Publishing
          1445-4416
          1445-4416
          January 2019
          : 47
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; and Southern Oregon Research and Extension Center, 569 Hanley Road., Central Point, OR 97502, USA; and Corresponding author. Email: alexander.levin@oregonstate.edu.
          [2 ] Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; and Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Avenue., Parlier, CA 93648, USA.
          [3 ] Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
          Article
          FP19073
          10.1071/FP19073
          31615618
          a0a74d4b-1f4c-4b3b-8497-29b2f40f3147
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article