15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Genetic Determinants of Bone Mass

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A genetic contribution to bone mass determination was first described in the early 70s. Elucidation of gene contribution to this has since been attempted through studies analyzing associations between bone mass acquisition and/or maintenance and polymorphic variations of several genes. The first to be described was the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR), initially claimed to contribute to almost 75% of the genetic variation in bone mineral density (BMD) in twin and general population studies. Not all of the studies published to date conclude that a clear relationship exists between polymorphic VDR alleles and BMD, and the molecular basis for the VDR gene polymorphisms influence on bone mineralization has not yet been clarified. Since then, other genes with a significant role in bone metabolism such as estradiol receptor, collagen type 1<sub>α1</sub>, TGF-β<sub>1</sub>, interleukin-6, calcitonin receptor, α<sub>2</sub>-HS-glycoprotein, osteocalcin, calcium-sensing receptor, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, β<sub>3</sub>-adrenergic receptor, apolipoprotein E, PTH, IGF-I and glucocorticoid receptor have been analyzed. Some polymorphic variations in these genes have been associated in some works with significant differences in BMD, with even more significant contributions when associations of different gene polymorphisms were analyzed. Again, the molecular basis for the contribution of these alleles to bone mass determination has not yet been described. A different approach has been attempted by linkage analysis of loci involved in bone density in pedigrees with low BMD using BMD as a quantitative trait. Recent results do not confirm, in these families, any association with any of the previously reported genes, but rather with other as yet unidentified genes. The genetic contribution to mild variations in the general population, as a result of environmental and endogenous individual influences, probably differs completely from that providing a pathologic BMD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Increased bone mass as a result of estrogen therapy in a man with aromatase deficiency.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Polymorphism in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene May Be Associated with an Increased Sensitivity to Glucocorticoids in Vivo

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vitamin D-receptor gene polymorphisms and bone density in prepubertal American girls of Mexican descent.

              Bone mass is under strong genetic control, and recent studies in adults have suggested that allelic differences in the gene for the vitamin D receptor may account for inherited variability in bone mass. We studied the relations of the vitamin D-receptor genotype to skeletal development and variation in the size, volume, and density of bone in children. We identified three allelic variants of the vitamin D-receptor gene using the polymerase chain reaction and three restriction enzymes (ApaI, BsmI, and TaqI) in 100 normal prepubertal American girls of Mexican descent. We then determined the relations of the different vitamin D-receptor genotypes (AA, Aa, aa, BB, Bb, bb, TT, Tt, and tt) to the cross-sectional area, cortical area, and cortical bone density of the femoral shaft and the cross-sectional area and density of the lumbar vertebrae. The vitamin D-receptor genotype was associated with femoral and vertebral bone density. Girls with aa and bb genotypes had 2 to 3 percent higher femoral bone density (P=0.008 and P=0.04, respectively) and 8 to 10 percent higher vertebral bone density (P=0.01 and P=0.03, respectively) than girls with AA and BB genotypes. There was no association between the cross-sectional area of the vertebrae or the cross-sectional or cortical area of the femur and the vitamin D-receptor genotype. The chronologic age, bone age, height, weight, body-surface area, and body-mass index did not differ significantly among girls with different vitamin D-receptor genotypes. Vitamin D-receptor gene alleles predict the density of femoral and vertebral bone in prepubertal American girls of Mexican descent.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRE
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                1999
                March 1999
                09 August 1999
                : 51
                : 3
                : 105-123
                Affiliations
                Unidad de Investigaciones en Endocrinología y Nutrición Pediátricas, Hospital Materno-Infantil Valle de Hebrón, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain
                Article
                23343 Horm Res 1999;51:105–123
                10.1159/000023343
                10461016
                a10b61dd-a1d9-4fbb-806e-eca81ecaea73
                © 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 203, Pages: 19
                Categories
                Review

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                VDR gene polymorphism,Bone mass,Genetic determinants

                Comments

                Comment on this article