17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adalimumab and severe uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) therapy

      abstract
      1 , , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
      BioMed Central
      15th Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PreS) Congress
      14-17 September 2008

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Chronic anterior uveitis in JIA can be severe and common immunosuppressive therapies may not be sufficient to control uveitis. Concerning biological drugs, Enbrel is usually ineffective, Infliximab is partially effective and is frequently associated with side effects requiring drug suspension, while Adalimumab, a TNF competitor, can be successful. Methods We report on a girl aged 17 years, affected since one year by a severe form of poliarticular JIA. She received immunosuppressive therapy (Methotrexate, Azathioprine, etc.), associated with oral steroids, with no articular benefit. Results When Enbrel plus Methotrexate was started she got into remission. After one year of this therapy, she presented uveitis in both eyes, so oral steroids were started again. She obtained only partial ocular improvement, even when she received Infliximab associated with Methotrexate. Meantime she underwent cataract surgery with visus reduction. After one year, Infliximab was suspended because of an adverse reaction (dyspnea and rash) and Adalimumab (0.7 mg/kg subcutaneous/14 days) associated with Methotrexate was started, with no side effects. Fourteen months later there are no flare for uveitis and/or arthritis. Following SUN criteria [1] we demonstrated ocular clinical improvement, not withstanding the presence of signs of cataract and glaucoma. Conclusion During the last ten years, biological drugs have been really useful to improve JIA outcome. In 2006 Biester S et al [2] showed Adalimumab efficacy in controlling arthritis and uveitis, with acceptable side effects, but further research is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group (2005) Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the first international workshop

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adalimumab in the therapy of uveitis in childhood.

            Chronic anterior uveitis in children often takes a serious course. Despite various immunosuppressive drugs some children do not respond sufficiently and there is a high risk of them becoming seriously disabled. Anti-TNF alpha therapy has been shown by our group and others to be mostly ineffective (Etanercept) or partly effective (Infliximab) with the risk of anaphylactic reactions. Here we report on 18 young patients treated with Adalimumab (Humira), a complete humanised anti-TNF alpha antibody. We retrospectively analysed 18 patients, who were treated with Adalimumab (20-40 mg, every 2 weeks, when ineffective every week); 17 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis, one was without detectable underlying disease. The age at onset of arthritis varied from 0.5-15 years and for uveitis from 2-19 years. Patients were included when the previous anti-inflammatory therapy had been ineffective. It consisted of systemic steroids (n = 18), Cyclosporin A (n = 18), Methotrexate (n = 18), Azathioprine (n = 12), Mycophenolate mofetil (n = 4), Cyclophosphamide (n = 2), Leflunomide (n = 3), Etanercept (n = 8) and Infliximab (n = 5). The grading for uveitis was: (a) effective: no relapse or more than two relapses less than before treatment, (b) mild: one relapse less than before treatment, (c) no response: no change in relapse rate and (d) worsening: more relapses under treatment than before. The grading for arthritis (depending on the clinical findings), using three out of six parameters of the ACR PED Criteria, was: effective, mild, no response, worsening. For arthritis (n = 16) the response to Adalimumab was effective in 10 of 16 patients, mild in three patients, three did not respond. For uveitis (n = 18) Adalimumab was effective in 16, mild in one child, and one patient did not show any effect. After a very good response initially a shorter application time had to be used to maintain the good anti-inflammatory effect in one child. Additional immunosuppressive treatment was used in seven of the effectively treated children. Due to elevation of liver enzymes in one patient, who also took MTX, Adalimumab had to be discontinued. No anaphylactic reactions or increased frequency of infections since start of Adalimumab treatment was reported. For our group of children with long lasting disease our results show that Adalimumab was effective or mildly effective against the arthritis in 81%, but in uveitis in 88%. While these results regarding arthritis are comparable with other TNF-alpha blocking drugs (Etanercept), Adalimumab seems to be much more effective against uveitis than Etanercept. Anaphylactic reactions, found in a previous study from our group after Infliximab treatment, were not seen with Adalimumab. The necessary dosage and the treatment period, which probably have to be defined individually for each patient, remain unclear.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Conference
              Pediatr Rheumatol Online J
              Pediatr Rheumatol Online J
              Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
              BioMed Central
              1546-0096
              2008
              15 September 2008
              : 6
              : Suppl 1
              : P76
              Affiliations
              [1 ]Institute G. Gaslini, Department of Pediatrics, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy
              [2 ]Institute G. Gaslini, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy
              Article
              1546-0096-6-S1-P76
              10.1186/1546-0096-6-S1-P76
              3334139
              a1e102db-9b97-4e86-b1d3-37a01978e4dc
              Copyright ©2008 Alpigiani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
              15th Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PreS) Congress
              London, UK
              14-17 September 2008
              History
              Categories
              Poster Presentation

              Pediatrics
              Pediatrics

              Comments

              Comment on this article