3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews

      1 , 1 , 1
      Journal of Information Technology
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Artificial intelligence (AI) is beginning to transform traditional research practices in many areas. In this context, literature reviews stand out because they operate on large and rapidly growing volumes of documents, that is, partially structured (meta)data, and pervade almost every type of paper published in information systems research or related social science disciplines. To familiarize researchers with some of the recent trends in this area, we outline how AI can expedite individual steps of the literature review process. Considering that the use of AI in this context is in an early stage of development, we propose a comprehensive research agenda for AI-based literature reviews (AILRs) in our field. With this agenda, we would like to encourage design science research and a broader constructive discourse on shaping the future of AILRs in research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

          Healthcare providers, consumers, researchers and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information, including evidence from healthcare research. It has become impossible for all to have the time and resources to find, appraise and interpret this evidence and incorporate it into healthcare decisions. Cochrane Reviews respond to this challenge by identifying, appraising and synthesizing research-based evidence and presenting it in a standardized format, published in The Cochrane Library (www.thecochranelibrary.com).<p><i>The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i> contains methodological guidance for the preparation and maintenance of Cochrane intervention reviews. Written in a clear and accessible format, it is the essential manual for all those preparing, maintaining and reading Cochrane reviews. Many of the principles and methods described here are appropriate for systematic reviews applied to other types of research and to systematic reviews of interventions undertaken by others. It is hoped therefore that this book will be invaluable to all those who want to understand the role of systematic reviews, critically appraise published reviews or perform reviews themselves.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Information Technology
                Journal of Information Technology
                SAGE Publications
                0268-3962
                1466-4437
                June 2022
                October 08 2021
                June 2022
                : 37
                : 2
                : 209-226
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Information Technologies, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
                Article
                10.1177/02683962211048201
                a2254941-90e5-47bf-94e6-b3c60bce0887
                © 2022

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article