27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evolution of surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in a dedicated gynaecologic oncology unit—seven year audit from a tertiary care centre in a developing country

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims
          1. To audit our performance as a dedicated gynaecologic oncology unit and to analyse how it has evolved over the years.

          2. To retrospectively evaluate the outcome of advanced ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval surgery versus upfront surgery.

          Methods and results

          One hundred and ninety-eight patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who were treated from 2004 to 2010 were analysed. Eighty-two patients (41.4%) underwent primary surgery and 116 (58.6%) received NACT. Overall, an optimal debulking rate of 81% was achieved with 70% for primary surgery and 88% following NACT. The optimal cytoreduction rate has improved from 55% in 2004 to 97% in 2010. In primary surgery, the optimal debulking rate increased from 42.8% in 2004 to 93% in 2010, whereas in NACT group the optimal cytoreduction rate increased from 60% to 100% by 2010.

          On the basis of the surgical complexity scoring system it was found that surgeries with intermediate complexity score had progressively increased over the years.

          There was a mean follow-up of 21 months ranging from 6 to 70 months. The progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing primary surgery were 23 and 40 months, respectively, while it was 22 and 40 months in patients who received NACT. However, patients who had suboptimal debulking, irrespective of primary treatment, had significantly worse OS (26 versus 47 months) compared with those who had optimal debulking.

          Conclusions

          As a dedicated gynaecologic oncology unit there has been an increase in the optimal cytoreduction rates. The number of complex surgeries, as denoted by the category of intermediate complexity score, has increased.

          Patients with advanced EOC treated with NACT followed by interval debulking have comparable survival to the patients undergoing primary surgery. Optimal cytoreduction irrespective of primary modality of treatment gives better survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.

          A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study #111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen as the new "standard," a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial. This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG #111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3-hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan-Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. The overall clinical response rate was 59% in the paclitaxel group and 45% in the cyclophosphamide group; the complete clinical remission rates were 41% and 27%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P =.01 for both). At a median follow-up of 38.5 months and despite a high rate of crossover (48%) from the cyclophosphamide arm to the paclitaxel arm at first detection of progression of disease, a longer progression-free survival (log-rank P =.0005; median of 15.5 months versus 11.5 months) and a longer overall survival (log-rank P =. 0016; median of 35.6 months versus 25.8 months) were seen in the paclitaxel regimen compared with the cyclophosphamide regimen. There is strong and confirmatory evidence from two large randomized phase III trials to support paclitaxel-cisplatin as the new standard regimen for treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complete cytoreductive surgery is feasible and maximizes survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study.

            Despite correlation between the completeness of surgical cytoreduction and survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, relatively few undergo complete cytoreduction. This study was initiated to prospectively determine the ability to surgically eliminate all visible disease in patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer and the associated impact on survival. Between 1990 and 1996, 163 consecutive patients underwent primary cytoreduction. The goal was the excision or ablation of all visible disease prior to initiation of systemic platinum-based combination chemotherapy. A multivariate analysis determined which clinical and pathologic variables influenced the probability of achieving complete cytoreduction (logistic regression) and survival (Cox proportional hazards model). One hundred thirty-nine patients (85.3%) underwent removal of all visible tumor, 22 (13.5%) had cytoreduction to 75 implants, P = 0.005), and stage (IIIC vs IV, P = 0.006). The probability of survival was independently influenced by age ( 61 years, P = 0.003), volume of ascites ( 1 liter, P = 0.01), stage (IIIC vs IV, P = 0.04), histology (clear cell and mucinous vs all other, P = 0.03), and the completeness of cytoreductive operation (complete vs incomplete cytoreduction, P = 0.02). Complete cytoreduction is possible for the majority of patients and improves survival, even compared to operations with minimal (
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.

              A reliable model for predicting the outcome of primary cytoreductive surgery may be a useful tool in the clinical management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Forty-one women with a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis and a histologic diagnosis of Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma following primary surgery performed by one of nine gynecologic oncologists were identified from tumor registry databases. All CT scans were analyzed retrospectively using a panel of 25 radiographic features without knowledge of the operative findings. Patient demographics, surgical findings and outcome, Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status, and pre-operative serum CA125 values were collected from patient medical records. Residual disease measuring /= 2 cm), bowel mesentery involvement (>/= 2 cm), suprarenal paraaortic lymph nodes (>/= 1 cm), omental extension (spleen, stomach, or lesser sac), and pelvic sidewall involvement and/or hydroureter were most strongly associated with surgical outcome. Using the Predictive Index scores, a receiver operating characteristic curve was generated with an area under the curve = 0. 969 +/- 0.023. In the final model, a Predictive Index score >/= 4 had the highest overall accuracy at 92.7% and identified patients undergoing suboptimal surgery with a sensitivity of 100% (21/21). The specificity, or ability to identify patients undergoing optimal surgery, was 85.0% (17/20). The PPV of a Predictive Index score >/= 4 was 87.5% (21/24), and the NPV was 100%. The ability of this model to correctly predict surgical outcome was statistically significant (P /= 4 demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, and was highly accurate in identifying patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma unlikely to undergo optimal primary cytoreductive surgery. The Predictive Index model may have clinical utility in guiding the management of patients with ovarian carcinoma. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecancermedicalscience
                Ecancermedicalscience
                ecancermedicalscience
                ecancermedicalscience
                Cancer Intelligence
                1754-6605
                2014
                17 April 2014
                : 8
                : 422
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgical and Gynaecologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Anupama Rajanbabu. anupamashyam@ 123456gmail.com and anupamar@ 123456aims.amrita.edu
                Article
                can-8-422
                10.3332/ecancer.2014.422
                3998656
                24834117
                a2dc0fc4-315b-44ba-bae0-5a5c69bf11cd
                © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 October 2013
                Categories
                Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                advanced ovarian cancer,primary cytoreduction,interval cytoreduction

                Comments

                Comment on this article