16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Ketamine With Psychiatric Symptoms and Implications for Its Therapeutic Use and for Understanding Schizophrenia : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This meta-analysis assesses the psychopathological outcomes in healthy volunteers and patients with schizophrenia treated with ketamine and the experimental factors associated with these findings.

          Key Points

          Question

          What psychopathological outcomes are associated with ketamine hydrochloride in healthy volunteers and patients with schizophrenia, and what factors are associated with these outcomes?

          Findings

          This meta-analysis of 36 studies, including 725 unique healthy participants, found that the acute administration of ketamine relative to placebo was associated with a meaningful increase in positive and negative symptoms of psychosis in healthy volunteers and patients with schizophrenia. This association was greater for positive compared with negative symptoms and when a bolus was given with the infusion relative to an infusion alone.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that ketamine is associated with psychosis-like symptoms in healthy volunteers and that the bolus administration of ketamine should be avoided when it is used in therapeutic contexts.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Ketamine hydrochloride is increasingly used to treat depression and other psychiatric disorders but can induce schizophrenia-like or psychotomimetic symptoms. Despite this risk, the consistency and magnitude of symptoms induced by ketamine or what factors are associated with these symptoms remain unknown.

          Objective

          To conduct a meta-analysis of the psychopathological outcomes associated with ketamine in healthy volunteers and patients with schizophrenia and the experimental factors associated with these outcomes.

          Data Sources

          MEDLINE, Embase, and PsychINFO databases were searched for within-participant, placebo-controlled studies reporting symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in response to an acute ketamine challenge in healthy participants or patients with schizophrenia.

          Study Selection

          Of 8464 citations retrieved, 36 studies involving healthy participants were included. Inclusion criteria were studies (1) including healthy participants; (2) reporting symptoms occurring in response to acute administration of subanesthetic doses of ketamine (racemic ketamine, s-ketamine, r-ketamine) intravenously; (3) containing a placebo condition with a within-subject, crossover design; (4) measuring total positive or negative symptoms using BPRS or PANSS; and (5) providing data allowing the estimation of the mean difference and deviation between the ketamine and placebo condition.

          Data Extraction and Synthesis

          Two independent investigators extracted study-level data for a random-effects meta-analysis. Total, positive, and negative BPRS and PANSS scores were extracted. Subgroup analyses were conducted examining the effects of blinding status, ketamine preparation, infusion method, and time between ketamine and placebo conditions. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used as effect sizes for individual studies. Standardized mean differences between ketamine and placebo conditions were calculated for total, positive, and negative BPRS and PANSS scores.

          Results

          The overall sample included 725 healthy volunteers (mean [SD] age, 28.3 [3.6] years; 533 [73.6%] male) exposed to the ketamine and placebo conditions. Racemic ketamine or S-ketamine was associated with a statistically significant increase in transient psychopathology in healthy participants for total (SMD = 1.50 [95% CI, 1.23-1.77]; P < .001), positive (SMD = 1.55 [95% CI, 1.29-1.81]; P < .001), and negative (SMD = 1.16 [95% CI, 0.96-1.35]; P < .001) symptom ratings relative to the placebo condition. The effect size for this association was significantly greater for positive than negative symptoms of psychosis (estimate, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.12-0.61]; P = .004). There was significant inconsistency in outcomes between studies ( I 2 range, 77%-83%). Bolus followed by constant infusion increased ketamine’s association with positive symptoms relative to infusion alone (effect size, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.36-1.90] vs 0.84 [95% CI, 0.35-1.33]; P = .006). Single-day study design increased ketamine’s ability to generate total symptoms (effect size, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.69-2.89] vs 1.39 [95% CI, 1.12-1.66]; P = .007), but age and sex did not moderate outcomes. Insufficient studies were available for meta-analysis of studies in schizophrenia. Of these studies, 2 found a statistically significant increase in symptoms with ketamine administration in total and positive symptoms. Only 1 study found an increase in negative symptom severity with ketamine.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This study found that acute ketamine administration was associated with schizophrenia-like or psychotomimetic symptoms with large effect sizes, but there was a greater increase in positive than negative symptoms and when a bolus was used. These findings suggest that bolus doses should be avoided in the therapeutic use of ketamine to minimize the risk of inducing transient positive (psychotic) symptoms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                21 May 2020
                May 2020
                21 May 2020
                : 3
                : 5
                : e204693
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC (Medical Research Council) London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ]South London and Maudsley NHS (National Health Service) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Yale University Medical School, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven
                [8 ]Department of Psychiatry and National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
                [9 ]University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Department of Veteran Affairs National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Clinical Neurosciences Division, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
                [11 ]Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 29, 2020.
                Published: May 21, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4693
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Beck K et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Oliver D. Howes, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom ( oliver.howes@ 123456kcl.ac.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Beck and Howes had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Beck, Borgan, McCutcheon, Brugger, Howes.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Beck, Hindley, Borgan, McCutcheon, Driesen, D'Souza, Howes.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Beck, Hindley, Borgan, Ginestet, McCutcheon, Brugger, D'Souza, Howes.
                Obtained funding: Beck, D'Souza, Howes.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Beck, Hindley, Borgan, McCutcheon, D'Souza, Krystal, Howes.
                Supervision: McCutcheon, Taylor, Krystal, Howes.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Beck reported receiving grants from the Royal College of Psychiatrists and Rosetrees Trust during the conduct of the study. Dr Ranganathan reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Ranganathan reported receiving grant funding from the NIH administered by Yale University, funding administered by Yale University from Roche and Insys Therapeutics, and consulting for Bioxcel Therapeutics. Dr D’Souza reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Organon International, Pfizer, Inc, AstraZeneca, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) during the conduct of the study; funding from the NIH administered by Yale University; funding administered by Yale University from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, the Heffter Institute, and the Wallace Foundation; and consulting for Abide. Dr Taylor reported receiving personal fees from H Lundbeck A/S, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, outside the submitted work. Dr Krystal reported receiving grants from NCATS during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Sunovion Pharmacueticals, Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Biogen, Inc, Cerevel Therapeutics, LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim International, Taisho Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc, Terran Pharmaceuticals, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, BlackThorn Therapeutics, Spring Health, Inc, Sage Therapeutics, Inc, and Inheris Pharmaceuticals, Inc, outside the submitted work; consulting relationships with AstraZeneca, Biogen, Inc, IDEC Corporation, Biomedisyn Corporation, Bionomics, Ltd (Australia), Boehringer Ingelheim International, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Epiodyne, Inc, Heptares Therapeutics, Janssen Research & Development, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Perception Neuroscience Holdings, Inc, Spring Health, Inc, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; serving on scientific advisory boards of Bioasis Technologies, Inc, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc (clinical advisory board), BlackThorn Therapeutics, Cadent Therapeutics (clinical advisory board), Cerevel Therapeutics, LLC, Lohocla Research Corporation, and PsychoGenics; a paid editorial relationship with Biological Psychiatry (editor); patents for dopamine and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors in treatment of schizophrenia, glutamate modulating agents in the treatment of mental disorders, intranasal administration of ketamine to treat depression, methods for treating suicidal ideation, composition and methods to treat addiction, treatment selection for major depressive disorder, compounds, compositions, and methods for treating or preventing depression and other diseases, combination therapy for treating or preventing depression or other mood diseases, ketamine for treatment-resistant depression with royalties paid and for suicide prevention licensed, and riluzole for generalized anxiety with royalties paid; stock ownership in Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Sage Pharmaceuticals, and Spring Health, Inc; and stock options in Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Medical Sciences, BlackThorn Therapeutics, and Terran Life Sciences, Inc. Dr Howes reported receiving investigator-initiated research funding from and/or participating in advisory/speaker meetings organized by Angellini, AstraZeneca, Autifony Therapeutics, Biogen, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Heptares Therapeutics, Jansenn, H Lundbeck A/C, Lyden-Delta, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, RAND Corporation, Recordati SpA, and Roche. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant MC-A656-5QD30 from the Medical Research Council, Maudsley Charity (no. 666), Brain and Behavior Research Foundation; grant 094849/Z/10/Z from Wellcome Trust (Dr Howes) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London; grants from the Royal College of Psychiatrists (Dr Beck); grants from Rosetrees Trust (Dr Beck); grants from the Stoneygate Trust (Dr Beck); and grant 200102/Z/15/Z from the Wellcome Trust (Dr McCutcheon).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.
                Additional Contributions: Chadi Abdallah, MD, National Center for PTSD–Clinical Neurosciences Division, US Department of Veterans Affairs, and Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Celia Morgan, PhD, Psychopharmacology and Addiction Research Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom; Xu Ke, MD, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland; and Paul Fletcher, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, provided original data to include in the analysis. None of these contributors was compensated for this work.
                Article
                zoi200224
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4693
                7243091
                32437573
                a33350ef-930e-4592-b5e7-f9091d5c2887
                Copyright 2020 Beck K et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 26 November 2019
                : 29 February 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article