29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      SARC025 arms 1 and 2: A phase 1 study of the poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib with temozolomide or irinotecan in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In preclinical Ewing sarcoma (ES) models, poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were identified as a potential therapeutic strategy with synergy in combination with cytotoxic agents. This study evaluated the safety and dosing of the PARP1/2 inhibitor niraparib (NIR) with temozolomide (TMZ; arm 1) or irinotecan (IRN; arm 2) in patients with pretreated ES.

          Methods

          Eligible patients in arm 1 received continuous NIR daily and escalating TMZ (days 2‐6 [D2‐6]) in cohort A. Subsequent patients received intermittent NIR dosing (cohort B), with TMZ re‐escalation in cohort C. In arm 2, patients were assigned to NIR (days 1‐7 [D1‐7]) and escalating doses of IRN (D2‐6).

          Results

          From July 2014 to May 2018, 29 eligible patients (23 males and 6 females) were enrolled in arms 1 and 2, which had 7 dose levels combined. Five patients experienced at least 1 dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) in arm 1 (grade 4 [G4] neutropenia for >7 days or G4 thrombocytopenia), and 3 patients experienced at least 1 DLT in arm 2 (grade 3 [G3] colitis, G3 anorexia, or G3 alanine aminotransferase elevation). The maximum tolerated dose was NIR at 200 mg every day on D1‐7 plus TMZ at 30 mg/m 2 every day on D2‐6 (arm 1) or NIR at 100 mg every day on D1‐7 plus IRN at 20 mg/m 2 every day on D2‐6 (arm 2). One confirmed partial response was observed in arm 2; the median progression‐free survival was 9.0 weeks (95% CI, 7.0‐10.1 weeks) and 16.3 weeks (95% CI, 5.1‐69.7 weeks) in arms 1 and 2, respectively. The median decrease in tumor poly(ADP‐ribose) activity was 89% (range, 83%‐98%).

          Conclusions

          The combination of NIR and TMZ or IRN was tolerable, but at lower doses in comparison with conventional cytotoxic combinations. A triple‐combination study of NIR, IRN, and TMZ has commenced.

          Abstract

          Preclinical evaluations have identified the EWS‐FLI1 translocation, pathognomonic of Ewing sarcoma, as a predictive factor of response to poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with synergistic cell death in vivo with DNA damaging agents. This phase 1 study examines the dosing and safety of a combination of the PARP inhibitor niraparib with temozolomide or irinotecan.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer

          Niraparib, an inhibitor of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has been associated with significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the presence or absence of BRCA mutations. The efficacy of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is unknown.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP Inhibitors.

            Small-molecule inhibitors of PARP are thought to mediate their antitumor effects as catalytic inhibitors that block repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB). However, the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors with regard to their effects in cancer cells is not fully understood. In this study, we show that PARP inhibitors trap the PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes at damaged DNA. Trapped PARP-DNA complexes were more cytotoxic than unrepaired SSBs caused by PARP inactivation, arguing that PARP inhibitors act in part as poisons that trap PARP enzyme on DNA. Moreover, the potency in trapping PARP differed markedly among inhibitors with niraparib (MK-4827) > olaparib (AZD-2281) > veliparib (ABT-888), a pattern not correlated with the catalytic inhibitory properties for each drug. We also analyzed repair pathways for PARP-DNA complexes using 30 genetically altered avian DT40 cell lines with preestablished deletions in specific DNA repair genes. This analysis revealed that, in addition to homologous recombination, postreplication repair, the Fanconi anemia pathway, polymerase β, and FEN1 are critical for repairing trapped PARP-DNA complexes. In summary, our study provides a new mechanistic foundation for the rational application of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy. ©2012 AACR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gene fusion with an ETS DNA-binding domain caused by chromosome translocation in human tumours.

              Ewing's sarcoma and related subtypes of primitive neuroectodermal tumours share a recurrent and specific t(11;22) (q24;q12) chromosome translocation, the breakpoints of which have recently been cloned. Phylogenetically conserved restriction fragments in the vicinity of EWSR1 and EWSR2, the genomic regions where the breakpoints of chromosome 22 and chromosome 11 are, respectively, have allowed identification of transcribed sequences from these regions and has indicated that a hybrid transcript might be generated by the translocation. Here we use these fragments to screen human complementary DNA libraries to show that the translocation alters the open reading frame of an expressed gene on chromosome 22 gene by substituting a sequence encoding a putative RNA-binding domain for that of the DNA-binding domain of the human homologue of murine Fli-1.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.strauss@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Cancer
                Cancer
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0142
                CNCR
                Cancer
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0008-543X
                1097-0142
                08 December 2020
                15 April 2021
                : 127
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/cncr.v127.8 )
                : 1301-1310
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
                [ 2 ] Population Health Sciences Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York
                [ 3 ] Cancer and Blood Disease Institute Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Los Angeles California
                [ 4 ] Department of Sarcoma The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
                [ 5 ] Department of Oncology University College London Hospitals NHS Trust London United Kingdom
                [ 6 ] Pediatric Oncology Branch National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research Bethesda Maryland
                [ 7 ] Seattle Children's Hospital Seattle Washington
                [ 8 ] National Clinical Target Validation Laboratory National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research Bethesda Maryland
                [ 9 ] Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Ann Arbor Michigan
                [ 10 ] University College London Cancer Institute London United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Corresponding Author: Sandra J. Strauss, PhD, MBBS, University College London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley St, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom ( s.strauss@ 123456ucl.ac.uk ).

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-1375
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7790-0777
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-0201
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-0260
                Article
                CNCR33349
                10.1002/cncr.33349
                8246769
                33289920
                a4604b9b-d20b-4a11-ae9d-13e81bce5249
                © 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 23 October 2020
                : 04 August 2020
                : 26 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 10, Words: 7165
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000054;
                Award ID: U54CA168512
                Funded by: GlaxoSmithKline , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100004330;
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000002;
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000272;
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Discipline
                Clinical Trials
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 15, 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:01.07.2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                ewing sarcoma,irinotecan,niraparib,poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (parp) inhibition,temozolomide

                Comments

                Comment on this article