33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A cohort study on the evolution of psychosocial problems in older patients with breast or colorectal cancer: comparison with younger cancer patients and older primary care patients without cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although older cancer survivors commonly report psychosocial problems, the impact of both cancer and ageing on the occurrence of these problems remains largely unknown. The evolution of depression, cognitive functioning, and fatigue was evaluated in a group of older cancer patients in comparison with a group of younger cancer patients and older persons without cancer.

          Methods

          Older (≥70 years) and younger cancer patients (50 – 69 years) with breast or colorectal cancer stage I - III, and older persons without cancer (≥70 years) were included. Data were collected at baseline and one year follow-up and were available for 536 persons. Depression was evaluated with the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Cognitive functioning was measured with the cognitive functioning subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Fatigue was measured with a Visual Analogue Scale. Risk factors for depression, cognitive functioning, and fatigue were analysed using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Risk factors included cancer- and ageing-related factors such as functional status, cancer treatment, and comorbidities.

          Results

          The evolution of psychosocial problems was similar for the group of older ( N = 125) and younger cancer patients ( N = 196): an increase in depression ( p < 0.01), slight worsening in cognitive functioning ( p = 0.01), and no clear change in fatigue. Also, compared to the group of people without cancer ( N = 215), the differences were small and after one year of follow-up only depression was more frequent in older cancer patients compared to older persons without cancer (18 % versus 9 %, p = 0.04). In multivariate analyses the main risk factors for psychosocial problems after one year follow-up were changes in functional status and presence of baseline depression, fatigue, or cognitive impairment.

          Conclusion

          Over the course of one year after a diagnosis of cancer, cancer patients face increasing levels of depression and increasing difficulties in cognitive functioning. The main risk factor for psychosocial problems was presence of the problem at baseline. This calls for regular screening for psychosocial problems and exchange of information on psychosocial functioning between different health care providers and settings during the treatment and follow-up trajectory of cancer patients.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0071-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.

          A new Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) designed specifically for rating depression in the elderly was tested for reliability and validity and compared with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). In constructing the GDS a 100-item questionnaire was administered to normal and severely depressed subjects. The 30 questions most highly correlated with the total scores were then selected and readministered to new groups of elderly subjects. These subjects were classified as normal, mildly depressed or severely depressed on the basis of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for depression. The GDS, HRS-D and SDS were all found to be internally consistent measures, and each of the scales was correlated with the subject's number of RDC symptoms. However, the GDS and the HRS-D were significantly better correlated with RDC symptoms than was the SDS. The authors suggest that the GDS represents a reliable and valid self-rating depression screening scale for elderly populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Progress in development of the index of ADL.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).

              As more and more cancers occur in elderly people, oncologists are increasingly confronted with the necessity of integrating geriatric parameters in the treatment of their patients. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) created a task force to review the evidence on the use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in cancer patients. A systematic review of the evidence was conducted. Several biological and clinical correlates of aging have been identified. Their relative weight and clinical usefulness is still poorly defined. There is strong evidence that a CGA detects many problems missed by a regular assessment in general geriatric and in cancer patients. There is also strong evidence that a CGA improves function and reduces hospitalization in the elderly. There is heterogeneous evidence that it improves survival and that it is cost-effective. There is corroborative evidence from a few studies conducted in cancer patients. Screening tools exist and were successfully used in settings such as the emergency room, but globally were poorly tested. The article contains recommendations for the use of CGA in research and clinical care for older cancer patients. A CGA, with or without screening, and with follow-up, should be used in older cancer patients, in order to detect unaddressed problems, improve their functional status, and possibly their survival. The task force cannot recommend any specific tool or approach above others at this point and general geriatric experience should be used.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Laura.deckx@med.kuleuven.be
                doris.van.abbema@mumc.nl
                Marjan.vandenakker@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                carine.vandenbroeke@med.kuleuven.be
                m.vandriel@uq.edu.au
                paul.bulens@jessazh.be
                vcg.tjan.heijnen@mumc.nl
                cindy.kenis@uzleuven.be
                eric.dejonge@zol.be
                bert.houben@jessazh.be
                Frank.buntinx@med.kuleuven.be
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                9 July 2015
                9 July 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 79
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Medical Oncology, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI - School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Building 16/910, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, 4029 QLD Australia
                [ ]Limburgs Oncologisch Centrum, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
                [ ]Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 815, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Abdominal and Oncological Surgery, Jessa Hospital – Campus Salvator, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
                Article
                71
                10.1186/s12877-015-0071-7
                4496825
                26156892
                a4c3b0d2-f374-40d0-a542-24fdf16c7427
                © Deckx et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 October 2014
                : 10 June 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Geriatric medicine
                depression,fatigue,cognition,oncology,older cancer patients,ageing
                Geriatric medicine
                depression, fatigue, cognition, oncology, older cancer patients, ageing

                Comments

                Comment on this article