Erratum to: Evaluation of the Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira Versus Continued Up-Titration of Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Erratum to: Adv Ther (2017) 34:954–965 DOI 10.1007/s12325-017-0502-2
In the original publication, Figure 3 was published incorrectly with errors. In Fig. 3,
the “Not defined*” labels should appear in the ‘Insulin Glargine U100’ row of the
table beneath the figure. In place of these the values ‘41,530’ and ‘57,642’, respectively,
should appear in the IDegLira row of the table beneath the figure. It has been corrected
and the correct version is provided below.
Fig. 3
Cost of control: patients with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline. $, 2015 US dollars; HbA1c,
glycated hemoglobin. *Cost of control values cannot be calculated in the insulin glargine
U100 arm for HbA1c ≤6.5% without weight gain and HbA1c ≤6.5% without confirmed hypoglycemia
and weight gain, as no patients in the insulin glargine U100 arm achieved these treatment
targets