6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Age differences in the prosocial influence effect

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as peer influence on risky behaviour, particularly in adolescence. The current study investigated the impact of social influence on the reporting of prosocial behaviour (any act intended to help another person). In this study, 755 participants aged 8–59 completed a computerized task in which they rated how likely they would be to engage in a prosocial behaviour. Afterwards, they were told the average rating (in fact fictitious) that other participants had given to the same question, and then were asked to rate the same behaviour again. We found that participants' age affected the extent to which they were influenced by other people: children (8–11 years), young adolescents (12–14 years) and mid‐adolescents (15–18 years) all significantly changed their ratings, while young adults (19–25 years) and adults (26–59 years) did not. Across the three youngest age groups, children showed the most susceptibility to prosocial influence, changing their reporting of prosocial behaviour the most. The study provides evidence that younger people's increased susceptibility to social influence can have positive outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study.

          In this study, 306 individuals in 3 age groups--adolescents (13-16), youths (18-22), and adults (24 and older)--completed 2 questionnaire measures assessing risk preference and risky decision making, and 1 behavioral task measuring risk taking. Participants in each age group were randomly assigned to complete the measures either alone or with 2 same-aged peers. Analyses indicated that (a) risk taking and risky decision making decreased with age; (b) participants took more risks, focused more on the benefits than the costs of risky behavior, and made riskier decisions when in peer groups than alone; and (c) peer effects on risk taking and risky decision making were stronger among adolescents and youths than adults. These findings support the idea that adolescents are more inclined toward risky behavior and risky decision making than are adults and that peer influence plays an important role in explaining risky behavior during adolescence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry.

            The presence of peers increases risk taking among adolescents but not adults. We posited that the presence of peers may promote adolescent risk taking by sensitizing brain regions associated with the anticipation of potential rewards. Using fMRI, we measured brain activity in adolescents, young adults, and adults as they made decisions in a simulated driving task. Participants completed one task block while alone, and one block while their performance was observed by peers in an adjacent room. During peer observation blocks, adolescents selectively demonstrated greater activation in reward-related brain regions, including the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, and activity in these regions predicted subsequent risk taking. Brain areas associated with cognitive control were less strongly recruited by adolescents than adults, but activity in the cognitive control system did not vary with social context. Results suggest that the presence of peers increases adolescent risk taking by heightening sensitivity to the potential reward value of risky decisions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lucy.foulkes@york.ac.uk
                Journal
                Dev Sci
                Dev Sci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687
                DESC
                Developmental Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1363-755X
                1467-7687
                15 April 2018
                November 2018
                : 21
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/desc.2018.21.issue-6 )
                : e12666
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience London UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Education University of York York UK
                [ 3 ] MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit Cambridge UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Lucy Foulkes, Department of Education, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.

                Email: lucy.foulkes@ 123456york.ac.uk

                Article
                DESC12666
                10.1111/desc.12666
                6221149
                29658168
                a5d12d3c-6806-4f51-9c18-982102915da8
                © 2018 The Authors. Developmental Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 September 2017
                : 22 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 9, Words: 7219
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Funded by: Jacobs Foundation
                Categories
                Paper
                Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                desc12666
                November 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.1 mode:remove_FC converted:07.11.2018

                Developmental biology
                Developmental biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article