62
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Evidence is mounting to suggest a causal relationship between the built environment and people’s physical activity behaviours, particularly active transport. The evidence base has been hindered to date by restricted consideration of cost and economic factors associated with built environment interventions, investigation of socioeconomic or ethnic differences in intervention effects, and an inability to isolate the effect of the built environment from other intervention types. The aims of this systematic review were to identify which environmental interventions increase physical activity in residents at the local level, and to build on the evidence base by considering intervention cost, and the differential effects of interventions by ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

          Methods

          A systematic database search was conducted in June 2015. Articles were eligible if they reported a quantitative empirical study (natural experiment or a prospective, retrospective, experimental, or longitudinal research) investigating the relationship between objectively measured built environment feature(s) and physical activity and/or travel behaviours in children or adults. Quality assessment was conducted and data on intervention cost and whether the effect of the built environment differed by ethnicity or socioeconomic status were extracted.

          Results

          Twenty-eight studies were included in the review. Findings showed a positive effect of walkability components, provision of quality parks and playgrounds, and installation of or improvements in active transport infrastructure on active transport, physical activity, and visits or use of settings. There was some indication that infrastructure improvements may predominantly benefit socioeconomically advantaged groups. Studies were commonly limited by selection bias and insufficient controlling for confounders. Heterogeneity in study design and reporting limited comparability across studies or any clear conclusions to be made regarding intervention cost.

          Conclusions

          Improving neighbourhood walkability, quality of parks and playgrounds, and providing adequate active transport infrastructure is likely to generate positive impacts on activity in children and adults. The possibility that the benefits of infrastructure improvements may be inequitably distributed requires further investigation. Opportunities to improve the quality of evidence exist, including strategies to improve response rates and representativeness, use of valid and reliable measurement tools, cost-benefit analyses, and adequate controlling for confounders.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda.

            Understanding how environmental attributes can influence particular physical activity behaviors is a public health research priority. Walking is the most common physical activity behavior of adults; environmental innovations may be able to influence rates of participation. Review of studies on relationships of objectively assessed and perceived environmental attributes with walking. Associations with environmental attributes were examined separately for exercise and recreational walking, walking to get to and from places, and total walking. Eighteen studies were identified. Aesthetic attributes, convenience of facilities for walking (sidewalks, trails); accessibility of destinations (stores, park, beach); and perceptions about traffic and busy roads were found to be associated with walking for particular purposes. Attributes associated with walking for exercise were different from those associated with walking to get to and from places. While few studies have examined specific environment-walking relationships, early evidence is promising. Key elements of the research agenda are developing reliable and valid measures of environmental attributes and walking behaviors, determining whether environment-behavior relationships are causal, and developing theoretical models that account for environmental influences and their interactions with other determinants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults.

              Enhancing community environments to support walking and bicycling serves as a promising approach to increase population levels of physical activity. However, few studies have simultaneously assessed perceptions and objectively measured environmental factors and their relative association with transportation or recreational physical activity. For this cross-sectional study, high- and low-income study areas were selected among census tracts in St. Louis MO ("low-walkable" city) and Savannah GA ("high-walkable" city). Between February and June 2002, a telephone survey of 1068 adults provided measures of the perceived environment and physical activity behavior. In this timeframe, objective measures were collected through environmental audits of all street segments (n =1158). These measures were summarized using 400-m buffers surrounding each respondent. Neighborhood characteristics included the land use environment, transportation environment, recreational facilities, aesthetics, and social environment. Associations were examined between neighborhood features and transportation- and recreation-based activity. After adjusting for age, gender, and education, transportation activity was negatively associated with objective measures of sidewalk levelness and perceived and objective neighborhood aesthetics. It was positively associated with perceived and objectively measured number of destinations and public transit, perceived access to bike lanes, and objective counts of active people in the neighborhood. Recreational activity was positively associated with perceived access to recreational facilities and objective measures of attractive features. These findings indicate that physical activities for transportation or recreational are associated with different perceived and objective environmental characteristics. Modifications to these features may change the physical activity behavior of residents exposed to them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                melody.smith@auckland.ac.nz
                jamie.hosking@auckland.ac.nz
                a.woodward@auckland.ac.nz
                k.witten@massey.ac.nz
                alex.macmillan@otago.ac.nz
                adrian@dovetailnz.com
                p.baas@ternz.co.nz
                hamish@mackieresearch.co.nz
                Journal
                Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
                Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
                The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
                BioMed Central (London )
                1479-5868
                16 November 2017
                16 November 2017
                2017
                : 14
                : 158
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, GRID grid.9654.e, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, ; Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, GRID grid.9654.e, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, ; Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
                [3 ]GRID grid.148374.d, SHORE and Whāriki Research Centre, , School of Public Health, Massey University, ; Box 6137, Wellesley Street, Auckland, PO New Zealand
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7830, GRID grid.29980.3a, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, ; Box 56, Dunedin, PO 9054 New Zealand
                [5 ]Dovetail Consulting Ltd, Box 78-146, Grey Lynn, Auckland, PO 1245 New Zealand
                [6 ]Transport Engineering Research New Zealand Limited, Box 11029, Auckland, PO 1542 New Zealand
                [7 ]Mackie Consulting Limited, Box 106525, Auckland, PO 1143 New Zealand
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-2564
                Article
                613
                10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
                5693449
                29145884
                a67e3baf-c871-48c4-ba6e-9399c8690fd2
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 May 2017
                : 6 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003524, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment;
                Award ID: 29898
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001505, Health Research Council of New Zealand;
                Award ID: 17-013
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                walking,cycling,health equality,urban form,causation,playgrounds,walkability
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                walking, cycling, health equality, urban form, causation, playgrounds, walkability

                Comments

                Comment on this article