5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anxiety and depression among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To summarise the evidence relating to the prevalence of anxiety and depression among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Design

          An umbrella review of systematic reviews was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methods.

          Data sources

          The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, JBI Evidence Synthesis, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL were searched in March 2021 for reviews published in English.

          Eligibility criteria

          Systematic reviews reporting the prevalence of anxiety and depression among HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two researchers screened each abstract and independently reviewed full text articles. Study quality was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews, and the degree of overlap in primary studies was calculated.

          Results

          Ten systematic reviews (100 unique studies), including 169 157 HCWs from 35 countries were included. The prevalence of anxiety among all HCWs ranged from 22.2% (95% CI 21.3% to 23.1%) to 33.0% (95% CI 31.9% to 34.1%). The prevalence of anxiety among physicians (n=5820) was reported to be between 17% and 19.8% and for nurses (n=14 938) between 22.8% and 27%. The prevalence of depression among all HCWs ranged from 17.9% (95% CI 17.1% to 18.8%) to 36% (95% CI 34.9% to 37.1%). The prevalence of depression among physicians (n=643) and nurses (n=8063) was reported to be 40.4% and 28%, respectively.

          Conclusions

          There is wide variation evident in the presence of anxiety and depression among HCWs. In particular, the prevalence of depression among physicians was high. Strategies to reduce the incidence of anxiety and depression are urgently required.

          PROSPERO registration number

          CRD42021238960.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

          The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Highlights • At least one in five healthcare professionals report symptoms of depression and anxiety. • Almost four in 10 healthcare workers experience sleeping difficulties and/or insomnia. • Rates of anxiety and depression were higher for female healthcare workers and nursing staff. • Milder mood symptoms are common and screening should aim to identify mild and sub-threshold syndromes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Psychological and Mental Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Medical Staff and General Public – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

              Highlights • We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19 • We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public • However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients • We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to identify high-risk people • Professional medical services should be allocated to high-risk population • More self-help materials should be made available for people with milder impact
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                21 September 2021
                21 September 2021
                : 11
                : 9
                : e054528
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health , University of Wollongong , Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
                [2 ]departmentSt George Hospital , South Eastern Sydney Local Health District , Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
                [3 ]departmentCentre for Evidence based Initiatives in Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence , University of Wollongong , Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
                [4 ]Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI) , Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Ritin Fernandez; ritin@ 123456uow.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6143-7703
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-986X
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-054528
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054528
                8458002
                34548373
                a68f8d44-7861-49cb-bc6a-90c2ac009970
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 June 2021
                : 31 August 2021
                Categories
                Evidence Based Practice
                1506
                2474
                1694
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                covid-19,anxiety disorders,statistics & research methods,medical education & training
                Medicine
                covid-19, anxiety disorders, statistics & research methods, medical education & training

                Comments

                Comment on this article