0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spatial and deep learning analyses of urban recovery from the impacts of COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigates urban recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic by focusing on three main types of working, commercial, and night-life activities and associating them with land use and inherent socio-economic patterns as well as points of interests (POIs). Massive multi-source and multi-scale data include mobile phone signaling data (500 m × 500 m), aerial images (0.49 m × 0.49 m), night light satellite data (500 m × 500 m), land use data (street-block), and POIs data. Methods of convolutional neural network, guided gradient-weighted class activation mapping, bivariate local indicator of spatial association, Elbow and K-means are jointly applied. It is found that the recovery in central areas was slower than in suburbs, especially in terms of working and night-life activities, showing a donut-shaped spatial pattern. Residential areas with mixed land uses seem more resilient to the pandemic shock. More than 60% of open spaces are highly associated with recovery in areas with high-level pre-pandemic social-economic activities. POIs of sports and recreation are crucial to the recovery in all areas, while POIs of transportation and science/culture are also important to the recovery in many areas. Policy implications are discussed from perspectives of open spaces, public facilities, neighborhood units, spatial structures, and anchoring roles of POIs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

          Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19

            Significance This paper presents a large-scale analysis of the impact of lockdown measures introduced in response to the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on socioeconomic conditions of Italian citizens. We leverage a massive near–real-time dataset of human mobility and we model mobility restrictions as an exogenous shock to the economy, similar to a natural disaster. We find that lockdown measures have a twofold effect: First, their impact on mobility is stronger in municipalities with higher fiscal capacity; second, they induce a segregation effect: mobility contraction is stronger in municipalities where inequality is higher and income per capita is lower. We highlight the necessity of fiscal measures that account for these effects, targeting poverty and inequality mitigation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is Returning to Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic Stressful? A Study on Immediate Mental Health Status and Psychoneuroimmunity Prevention Measures of Chinese Workforce

              Highlights • The psychological effects of returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. • 10.8% of respondents suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder after returning to work. • Returning to work had not caused a high level of psychiatric symptoms in the workforce. • Psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures were associated with less psychiatric symptoms. • More executives practiced hand hygiene and more workers avoided sharing utensils. • Psychoneuroimmunity measures of the Chinese workforce can be applied to other countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                junyizh24@gmail.com , zjy@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                11 February 2023
                11 February 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 2447
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.13402.34, ISNI 0000 0004 1759 700X, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, , Zhejiang University, ; Hangzhou, 310058 China
                [2 ]GRID grid.257022.0, ISNI 0000 0000 8711 3200, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, , Hiroshima University, ; Higashihiroshima, 739-8529 Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.263826.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1761 0489, School of Transportation, , Southeast University, ; Nanjing, 211189 China
                [4 ]GRID grid.257022.0, ISNI 0000 0000 8711 3200, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, , Hiroshima University, ; Higashihiroshima, 739-8529 Japan
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7125-5279
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-0416
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-542X
                Article
                29189
                10.1038/s41598-023-29189-5
                9922321
                36774395
                a6b2d48d-33c4-451d-835c-a82ab9a6e7b8
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 1 October 2022
                : 31 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: J-RAPID Collaborative Research/Survey Program for Urgent Research
                Award ID: JPMJJR2006
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications/Issues (ELSI) Research
                Award ID: JPMJRX20J6
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Uncategorized
                infectious diseases,socioeconomic scenarios,sustainability
                Uncategorized
                infectious diseases, socioeconomic scenarios, sustainability

                Comments

                Comment on this article