16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating Factors for Prophylactic Feeding Tube Placement in Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Though better studied in head/neck cancers, there are currently no studies on timing of feeding tube (FT) placement in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. This study sought to discern characteristics of patients who used versus did not use a prophylactic FT (pFT), and also analyzed factors associated with placement of FTs during chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

          Methods/materials

          From 1998 to 2013, 1,329 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT, of which 323 received an FT. Patients for whom FTs were placed prior to treatment due to tumor occlusion or substantial weight loss ( n = 130), and those with FTs placed following treatment ( n = 43) were excluded. One hundred patients had pFTs placed, and 50 underwent placement during CRT. The following was collected for each patient: demographic/patient information, oncologic/treatment characteristics, and CRT tolerance.

          Results

          No significant differences were found in any parameter between cohorts that used ( n = 66) versus did not use a pFT ( n = 34); on univariate and multivariate analyses, no pretreatment characteristic associated with using a pFT. When compared with patients who used a pFT ( n = 66), those who required an FT during CRT ( n = 50) had lower body mass index ( p = 0.045), underwent higher-dose radiotherapy ( p = 0.003), and received induction chemotherapy ( p = 0.031). On multivariate analysis, receipt of induction chemotherapy and greater weight loss and esophagitis during treatment were associated with placement of FTs during CRT ( p < 0.05).

          Conclusion

          Of our cohort who received pFTs, there were no clinical factors that predicted for their use. Patients must be closely monitored for weight loss and esophagitis when receiving CRT in order to intervene prior to further worsening of toxicities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Correlation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma.

          The relationship between the pre-operative nutritional condition and the outcome of the surgical treatment in patients with oesophageal carcinoma has been discussed diversely. The aim of the current study was to demonstrate the relationship between pre-operative nutritional condition and post-operative complications and prognosis following surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with oesophageal carcinoma treated with oesophageal resection and reconstruction were selected. The correlation of pre-operative values of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with the incidence of post-operative complications and prognosis of the patients was investigated. The mean pre-operative value of PNI in patients with post-operative complications (41.8+/-5.4) was significantly lower than that in patients without post-operative complications (46.5+/-5.3; P<0.0001). The survival in patients with higher PNI value was significantly more favourable than that in patients with lower PNI value (P=0.0001). Pre-operative assessment of the nutritional condition could provide predictive information for post-operative complications in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Surgery in esophageal and gastric cancer patients: what is the role for nutrition support in your daily practice?

            Cancers of the esophagus and stomach have a major impact on patients' nutritional status by virtue of these organs' inherent digestive functions. Many patients with these cancers will require surgical intervention, which imposes further metabolic demands and compounds preexisting nutritional disorders. Patients with esophagogastric cancer are likely to have lost weight by the time the diagnosis is made. This fact alone is of clinical importance, because it is well known that patients who have lost weight will have higher operative mortality and morbidity rates than patients who maintain their weight. Initial assessment of patients with esophagogastric cancer should include a routine evaluation of nutritional status. This will allow the identification of patients who are at risk of complications, particularly in the postoperative setting. These patients should be targeted for specific nutritional support.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with oesophageal cancer: a phase II study

              This study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemoradiation consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel and concurrent radiotherapy for patients with resectable (T2-3N0-1M0) oesophageal cancer. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 50 mg m−2 and carboplatin AUC=2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 and concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions, 5 days per week), followed by oesophagectomy. All 54 entered patients completed the chemoradiation without delay or dose-reduction. Grade 3–4 toxicities were: neutropaenia 15%, thrombocytopaenia 2%, and oesophagitis 7.5%. After completion of the chemoradiotherapy 63% had a major endoscopical response. Fifty-two patients (96%) underwent a resection. The postoperative mortality rate was 7.7%. All patients had an R0-resection. The pathological complete response rate was 25%, and an additional 36.5% had less than 10% vital residual tumour cells. At a median follow-up of 23.2 months, the median survival time has not yet been reached. The probability of disease-free survival after 30 months was 60%. In conclusion, weekly neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiotherapy is a very tolerable regimen and can be given on an outpatient basis. It achieves considerable down staging and a subsequent 100% radical resection rate in this series. A phase III trial with this regimen is now ongoing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                27 September 2017
                2017
                : 7
                : 235
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, NE, United States
                [2] 2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Youssef Zeidan, American University of Beirut, Lebanon

                Reviewed by: Stephan Bodis, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland; John M. Watkins, University of Iowa, United States

                *Correspondence: Steven H. Lin, shlin@ 123456mdanderson.org

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2017.00235
                5623934
                a7fb831d-ff36-4469-a8ee-727edadfa19c
                Copyright © 2017 Verma, Allen and Lin.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 June 2017
                : 12 September 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 6, Words: 4124
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute Cancer Center
                Award ID: CA016672
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                esophageal cancer,gastric tube,nutrition,chemotherapy,radiation therapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                esophageal cancer, gastric tube, nutrition, chemotherapy, radiation therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article