15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chloroquine triggers Epstein-Barr virus replication through phosphorylation of KAP1/TRIM28 in Burkitt lymphoma cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Trials to reintroduce chloroquine into regions of Africa where P. falciparum has regained susceptibility to chloroquine are underway. However, there are long-standing concerns about whether chloroquine increases lytic-replication of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), thereby contributing to the development of endemic Burkitt lymphoma. We report that chloroquine indeed drives EBV replication by linking the DNA repair machinery to chromatin remodeling-mediated transcriptional repression. Specifically, chloroquine utilizes ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) to phosphorylate the universal transcriptional corepressor Krüppel-associated Box-associated protein 1/tripartite motif-containing protein 28 (KAP1/TRIM28) at serine 824 –a mechanism that typically facilitates repair of double-strand breaks in heterochromatin, to instead activate EBV. Notably, activation of ATM occurs in the absence of detectable DNA damage. These findings i) clarify chloroquine’s effect on EBV replication, ii) should energize field investigations into the connection between chloroquine and endemic Burkitt lymphoma and iii) provide a unique context in which ATM modifies KAP1 to regulate persistence of a herpesvirus in humans.

          Author summary

          Viruses that persist for the life of the host, like the herpesvirus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), tightly regulate lytic replication to reduce killing of host cells and ensure virus survival. We show that repression of EBV replication is disrupted by the antimalarial drug chloroquine which modifies an otherwise normal cellular mechanism that repairs DNA, to influence gene expression through a process known as chromatin remodeling. This finding a) reveals a new connection between the DNA repair machinery and gene regulation and b) resolves a long-standing dispute over whether chloroquine increases EBV replication, thereby contributing to endemic Burkitt lymphoma, a cancer almost uniformly associated with EBV. There are ongoing efforts to re-introduce chloroquine into parts of Africa where falciparum malaria has regained susceptibility to chloroquine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Terminal differentiation into plasma cells initiates the replicative cycle of Epstein-Barr virus in vivo.

          In this paper we demonstrate that the cells which initiate replication of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in the tonsils of healthy carriers are plasma cells (CD38hi, CD10-, CD19+, CD20lo, surface immunoglobulin negative, and cytoplasmic immunoglobulin positive). We further conclude that differentiation into plasma cells, and not the signals that induce differentiation, initiates viral replication. This was confirmed by in vitro studies showing that the promoter for BZLF1, the gene that begins viral replication, becomes active only after memory cells differentiate into plasma cells and is also active in plasma cell lines. This differs from the reactivation of BZLF1 in vitro, which occurs acutely and is associated with apoptosis and not with differentiation. We suggest that differentiation and acute stress represent two distinct pathways of EBV reactivation in vivo. The fraction of cells replicating the virus decreases as the cells progress through the lytic cycle such that only a tiny fraction actually release infectious virus. This may reflect abortive replication or elimination of cells by the cellular immune response. Consistent with the later conclusion, the cells did not down regulate major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, suggesting that this is not an immune evasion tactic used by EBV and that the cells remain vulnerable to cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte attack.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin.

            Dynamic changes in histone modification are critical for regulating DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Activation of the Tip60 acetyltransferase by DSBs requires interaction of Tip60 with histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 (H3K9me3). However, how H3K9 methylation is regulated during DSB repair is not known. Here, we demonstrate that a complex containing kap-1, HP1, and the H3K9 methyltransferase suv39h1 is rapidly loaded onto the chromatin at DSBs. Suv39h1 methylates H3K9, facilitating loading of additional kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 through binding of HP1's chromodomain to the nascent H3K9me3. This process initiates cycles of kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 loading and H3K9 methylation that facilitate spreading of H3K9me3 and kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 complexes for tens of kilobases away from the DSB. These domains of H3K9me3 function to activate the Tip60 acetyltransferase, allowing Tip60 to acetylate both ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase and histone H4. Consequently, cells lacking suv39h1 display defective activation of Tip60 and ATM, decreased DSB repair, and increased radiosensitivity. Importantly, activated ATM rapidly phosphorylates kap-1, leading to release of the repressive kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 complex from the chromatin. ATM activation therefore functions as a negative feedback loop to remove repressive suv39h1 complexes at DSBs, which may limit DSB repair. Recruitment of kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 to DSBs therefore provides a mechanism for transiently increasing the levels of H3K9me3 in open chromatin domains that lack H3K9me3 and thereby promoting efficient activation of Tip60 and ATM in these regions. Further, transient formation of repressive chromatin may be critical for stabilizing the damaged chromatin and for remodeling the chromatin to create an efficient template for the DNA repair machinery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Epstein-Barr virus lytic program is controlled by the co-operative functions of two transactivators.

              The propagation of herpesviruses has long been viewed as a temporally regulated sequential process that results from the consecutive expression of specific viral transactivators. As a key step in this process, lytic viral DNA replication is considered as a checkpoint that controls the expression of the late structural viral genes. In a novel genetic approach, we show that both hypotheses do not hold true for the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The study of viral mutants of EBV in which the early genes BZLF1 and BRLF1 are deleted allowed a precise assignment of the function of these proteins. Both transactivators were absolutely essential for viral DNA replication. Both BZLF1 and BRLF1 were required for full expression of the EBV proteins expressed during the lytic program, although the respective influence of these molecules on the expression of various viral target genes varied greatly. In replication-defective viral mutants, neither early gene expression nor DNA replication was a prerequisite for late gene expression. This work shows that BRLF1 and BZLF1 harbor distinct but complementary functions that influence all stages of viral production.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Pathog
                PLoS Pathog
                plos
                plospath
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7366
                1553-7374
                1 March 2017
                March 2017
                : 13
                : 3
                : e1006249
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America
                Wistar Institute, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: SBM XL EMB.

                • Formal analysis: SBM XL EMB.

                • Funding acquisition: SBM.

                • Investigation: XL EMB.

                • Methodology: SBM XL EMB.

                • Project administration: SBM.

                • Supervision: SBM.

                • Validation: SBM XL.

                • Visualization: SBM XL EMB.

                • Writing – original draft: SBM XL.

                • Writing – review & editing: SBM XL.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-2288
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497
                Article
                PPATHOGENS-D-17-00065
                10.1371/journal.ppat.1006249
                5348047
                28249048
                a98c90c2-97db-4619-bf04-21a8ac797970
                © 2017 Li et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 January 2017
                : 17 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 0, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000060, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
                Award ID: AI113134
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000060, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
                Award ID: AI115834
                Award Recipient :
                SBM was supported by NIH R01 AI113134, NIH R41 AI115834 and SUNY-Research Foundation. EMB was supported by NIH T32AI007539. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Antimalarials
                Chloroquine
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Post-Translational Modification
                Phosphorylation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Virology
                Viral Replication
                Lytic Cycle
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                DNA viruses
                Herpesviruses
                Epstein-Barr virus
                Biology and life sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical microbiology
                Microbial pathogens
                Viral pathogens
                Herpesviruses
                Epstein-Barr virus
                Medicine and health sciences
                Pathology and laboratory medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial pathogens
                Viral pathogens
                Herpesviruses
                Epstein-Barr virus
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                Viral pathogens
                Herpesviruses
                Epstein-Barr virus
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                DNA
                DNA damage
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                DNA
                DNA damage
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                DNA
                DNA replication
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                DNA
                DNA replication
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Precipitation Techniques
                Immunoprecipitation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Molecular Probe Techniques
                Immunoblotting
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Molecular Probe Techniques
                Immunoblotting
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2017-03-13
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article