47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validação da versão brasileira da escala de religiosidade de Duke (DUREL) Translated title: Validity of the Brazilian version of the Duke Religious Index (DUREL)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          CONTEXTO: Há escassez de instrumentos validados para o estudo da religiosidade em amostras brasileiras. Um recente estudo realizado em uma amostra comunitária sugeriu adequada validade para a versão em português brasileiro do índice de Religiosidade de Duke (P-DUREL). Entretanto, as propriedades psicométricas do P-DUREL não foram estudadas em amostras psiquiátricas e/ou de estudantes universitários. OBJETIVO: Determinar a consistência interna, a confiabilidade teste-reteste e a validade convergente-discriminante do P-DUREL em duas amostras distintas. MÉTODOS: Amostra 1: estudantes universitários (n = 323). Amostra 2: pacientes psiquiátricos (n = 102). Foram aplicados o P-DUREL e o Instrumento de Qualidade de Vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde - Módulo Espiritualidade, Religiosidade e Crenças Pessoais (WHOQOL-SRPB) em ambas as amostras; os sintomas psicológicos foram medidos por meio do Inventário Beck de Depressão (IDB) e do Inventário Beck de Ansiedade (IAB) na amostra 1 e da Escala Hospitalar de Ansiedade e Depressão (HADS) na amostra 2. RESULTADOS: O P-DUREL teve adequada consistência interna (α de Cronbach > 0,80) e confiabilidade teste-reteste (Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse > 0,90) em ambas as amostras. Correlações moderadas entre as subescalas da P-DUREL (0,58 < r < 0,71) foram observadas. Além disso, correlações significantes entre os escores do P-DUREL com o escore geral do WHOQOL-SRPB, bem como com medidas de sintomas psicológicos, foram observadas em ambas as amostras. CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo abre perspectivas para o uso do P-DUREL para a investigação das dimensões da religiosidade em amostras brasileiras com características sociodemográficas diversas.

          Translated abstract

          BACKGROUND: There is a shortage of validated instruments for the study of religiousness in Brazilian samples. A recent study in a community sample pointed to an adequate validity for the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Duke Religiosity Index (P-DUREL). Nevertheless, no study to date has investigated the psychometric properties of the P-DUREL in psychiatric and/or university student samples. OBJECTIVE: To determine the internal consistency, the test-retest reliability and the convergent-discriminant validity of the P-DUREL in two distinct samples. METHODS: Sample 1: university students (n = 323). Sample 2: psychiatric patients (n = 102). The P-DUREL and the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument-Spirituality, Religion and Personal Beliefs module (WHOQOL-SRPB); psychological distress symptoms were measured by means the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in sample 1, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in sample 2. RESULTS: The P-DUREL had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.80) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.90) in both samples. Moderate correlations (0.58 < r < 0.71) between the P-DUREL subscales were observed. Furthermore, significant correlations between the P-DUREL scores with the general WHOQOL-SRPB scores as well as with psychological distress symptoms measures were observed in both samples. DISCUSSION: The present study opens perspective for the use of P-DUREL for the investigation of religiousness dimensions in Brazilian samples with diverse socio-demographic backgrounds.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.

          To review the literature of the validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A review of the 747 identified papers that used HADS was performed to address the following questions: (I) How are the factor structure, discriminant validity and the internal consistency of HADS? (II) How does HADS perform as a case finder for anxiety disorders and depression? (III) How does HADS agree with other self-rating instruments used to rate anxiety and depression? Most factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor solution in good accordance with the HADS subscales for Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D), respectively. The correlations between the two subscales varied from.40 to.74 (mean.56). Cronbach's alpha for HADS-A varied from.68 to.93 (mean.83) and for HADS-D from.67 to.90 (mean.82). In most studies an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved when caseness was defined by a score of 8 or above on both HADS-A and HADS-D. The sensitivity and specificity for both HADS-A and HADS-D of approximately 0.80 were very similar to the sensitivity and specificity achieved by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Correlations between HADS and other commonly used questionnaires were in the range.49 to.83. HADS was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A Five-Item Measure for Use in Epidemological Studies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Research on Religion, Spirituality, and Mental Health: A Review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rpc
                Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo)
                Arch. Clin. Psychiatry (São Paulo)
                Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo, SP, Brazil )
                0101-6083
                1806-938X
                2012
                : 39
                : 4
                : 130-135
                Affiliations
                [01] Fortaleza CE orgnameUniversidade Federal do Ceará orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina orgdiv2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas Brasil
                [02] Fortaleza CE orgnameFaculdade de Medicina orgdiv1Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia Brasil
                [03] Juiz de Fora MG orgnameUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina orgdiv2Núcleo de Pesquisas em Espiritualidade e Saúde Brasil
                [05] orgnameFaculdade de Medicina
                [04] orgnameDepartamento de Psicologia
                Article
                S0101-60832012000400003 S0101-6083(12)03900400003
                10.1590/S0101-60832012000400003
                a9f4248d-8132-4a89-ad5b-be49cf1b6cdb

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 24 May 2012
                : 16 December 2011
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 48, Pages: 6
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Artigos Originais

                sintomas depressivos,Religiousness,validation study,Duke Religious Index,mental health,depressive symptoms,Religiosidade,estudo de validação,Índice de Religiosidade de Duke,saúde mental

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content281

                Cited by29

                Most referenced authors802