1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Collecting wild Miscanthus germplasm in Asia for crop improvement and conservation in Europe whilst adhering to the guidelines of the United Nations’ Convention on Biological Diversity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims

          Germplasm with diverse, agronomically relevant traits forms the foundation of a successful plant breeding programme. Since 1993, the United Nations has been advocating the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the subsequent 2002 Bonn Guidelines as international best practice on germplasm collection and use. In 2006, a European team made an expedition to Asia to collect wild germplasm of Miscanthus, a C 4 perennial rhizomatous grass, for breeding an environmentally adaptable, resilient and high-yielding bioenergy crop. We outline general aspects of germplasm collection, conservation, breeding and biomass production evaluation while following the CBD’s guidelines, respecting biodiversity and conservation needs, and the ethical use of genetic resources.

          Methods

          Effective protocols, quarantine, methods for collecting seed and rhizomes, and a genebank for conservation were established. Versatile informatics and database architecture were used to assist in selection, flowering synchronization, crossing, evaluation, phenotyping and data integration. Approaches were formulated to comply with the CBD guidelines.

          Key Results

          A total of 303 accessions of M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus and M. floridulus were collected from 158 geographically and environmentally diverse locations. These species were shown to accumulate different amounts of aerial biomass due to combinations of stem count, height and thickness. Progeny from one interspecies cross accumulated more biomass in early trials and has shown double the yield performance in years 3–4 compared with the existing commercial cultivar M. × giganteus. An example of an F 1 hybrid has already demonstrated the long-term potential of exploiting this collection for a breeding programme.

          Conclusions

          By conforming to the CBD principles, the authors’ international collaboration provides a practical example of implementing the CBD. The collection widened the genetic diversity of Miscanthus available to allow for breeding of novel hybrids that exhibit more diverse traits to increase yield and resilience for growth on marginal land and in climate-challenged environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          More productive than maize in the Midwest: How does Miscanthus do it?

          In the first side-by-side large-scale trials of these two C(4) crops in the U.S. Corn Belt, Miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) was 59% more productive than grain maize (Zea mays). Total productivity is the product of the total solar radiation incident per unit land area and the efficiencies of light interception (epsilon(i)) and its conversion into aboveground biomass (epsilon(ca)). Averaged over two growing seasons, epsilon(ca) did not differ, but epsilon(i) was 61% higher for Miscanthus, which developed a leaf canopy earlier and maintained it later. The diurnal course of photosynthesis was measured on sunlit and shaded leaves of each species on 26 dates. The daily integral of leaf-level photosynthetic CO(2) uptake differed slightly when integrated across two growing seasons but was up to 60% higher in maize in mid-summer. The average leaf area of Miscanthus was double that of maize, with the result that calculated canopy photosynthesis was 44% higher in Miscanthus, corresponding closely to the biomass differences. To determine the basis of differences in mid-season leaf photosynthesis, light and CO(2) responses were analyzed to determine in vivo biochemical limitations. Maize had a higher maximum velocity of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylation, velocity of phosphoenolpyruvate regeneration, light saturated rate of photosynthesis, and higher maximum quantum efficiency of CO(2) assimilation. These biochemical differences, however, were more than offset by the larger leaf area and its longer duration in Miscanthus. The results indicate that the full potential of C(4) photosynthetic productivity is not achieved by modern temperate maize cultivars.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK

            Abstract Planting the perennial biomass crop Miscanthus in the UK could offset 2–13 Mt oil eq. yr−1, contributing up to 10% of current energy use. Policymakers need assurance that upscaling Miscanthus production can be performed sustainably without negatively impacting essential food production or the wider environment. This study reviews a large body of Miscanthus relevant literature into concise summary statements. Perennial Miscanthus has energy output/input ratios 10 times higher (47.3 ± 2.2) than annual crops used for energy (4.7 ± 0.2 to 5.5 ± 0.2), and the total carbon cost of energy production (1.12 g CO2‐C eq. MJ−1) is 20–30 times lower than fossil fuels. Planting on former arable land generally increases soil organic carbon (SOC) with Miscanthus sequestering 0.7–2.2 Mg C4‐C ha−1 yr−1. Cultivation on grassland can cause a disturbance loss of SOC which is likely to be recovered during the lifetime of the crop and is potentially mitigated by fossil fuel offset. N2O emissions can be five times lower under unfertilized Miscanthus than annual crops and up to 100 times lower than intensive pasture. Nitrogen fertilizer is generally unnecessary except in low fertility soils. Herbicide is essential during the establishment years after which natural weed suppression by shading is sufficient. Pesticides are unnecessary. Water‐use efficiency is high (e.g. 5.5–9.2 g aerial DM (kg H2O)−1, but high biomass productivity means increased water demand compared to cereal crops. The perennial nature and belowground biomass improves soil structure, increases water‐holding capacity (up by 100–150 mm), and reduces run‐off and erosion. Overwinter ripening increases landscape structural resources for wildlife. Reduced management intensity promotes earthworm diversity and abundance although poor litter palatability may reduce individual biomass. Chemical leaching into field boundaries is lower than comparable agriculture, improving soil and water habitat quality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The use of dna sequencing (ITS and trnL-F), AFLP, and fluorescent in situ hybridization to study allopolyploid Miscanthus (Poaceae).

              Two clones of Miscanthus, grown under the names M. ×giganteus and M. sacchariflorus, have been used in biomass trials in Europe, but neither the identity of these clones nor their origin has been established. DNA sequencing, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and chromosome studies confirm that M. ×giganteus is an allotriploid (2n = 3x = 57) combining genomes from M. sinensis (2n = 2x = 38) and M. sacchariflorus (2n = 38 or 76). Two alleles of the internal transcribed spacer of 18S-25S nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) were discovered in polymerase chain reaction products of M. ×giganteus. Cloning of these revealed that one matched M. sinensis and the other M. sacchariflorus. Plastid trnL intron and trnL-F spacer sequences showed that the maternal lineage of M. ×giganteus was M. sacchariflorus. Fluorescent in situ hybridization, FISH, was used to investigate genome organization in Miscanthus but was unable to differentiate between the different parental genomes present in M. ×giganteus, indicating that two parental genomes are still extremely similar at the repetitive DNA level. This study is an example in which rDNA sequences and AFLP fingerprints permit identification of the parental genomes in a hybrid, but FISH methods, at the repetitive DNA level (including genomic in situ hybridization, GISH), were unable to do so because their sequences remain too similar.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Bot
                Ann. Bot
                annbot
                Annals of Botany
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0305-7364
                1095-8290
                October 2019
                22 December 2018
                22 December 2018
                : 124
                : 4 , Special Issue on Developing sustainable bioenergy crops for future climates
                : 591-604
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University , Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, UK
                [2 ] CERES Inc. , 1535 Rancho Conejo Blvd, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
                [3 ] Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun-Yat-Sen University , Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [4 ] Institute of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK
                [5 ] The Guangdong Association of Grass and Environment , Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China
                [6 ] Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute (TESRI) , Chi-Chi, Nantou, Taiwan
                [7 ] Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs , Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, UK
                [8 ] Julius Kuhn Institut (JKI) Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen, Institute for Crop and Soil Science , Bundesallee, Braunschweig, Germany
                [9 ] Dongying Agricultural Institute , Jiaozhoulu 383, Dongying, Shandong Province, China
                [10 ] Field Science Centre for the Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University , Sapporo, Japan
                Author notes
                correspondence. E-mail lsh@ 123456aber.ac.uk
                Article
                mcy231
                10.1093/aob/mcy231
                6821356
                30596965
                aa471b75-3925-496c-abfa-f9a1fbb5515d
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 May 2018
                : 18 July 2018
                : 06 December 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 10.13039/501100000277
                Award ID: NF0436
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 10.13039/501100000268
                Award ID: LK0863
                Award ID: BBS/E/G/00003134
                Award ID: BBS/E/W/0012843A
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Plant science & Botany
                miscanthus,bioenergy,plant breeding,germplasm collection,germplasm evaluation,convention on biological diversity,cbd,the nagoya protocol,conservation,biodiversity,bonn guidelines,ethical use of genetic resources

                Comments

                Comment on this article