9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Explantation of an Infected Fenestrated Abdominal Endograft with Autologous Venous Reconstruction

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Infectious complications after FEVAR cause significant problems, with radical surgery considered to be the last resort for treatment.

          Case report

          A 72 year old man presented with infection 1 month after FEVAR. Conservative therapy with percutaneous abscess drainage and antibiotics suppressed the infection for 10 months; however, when new peri-aortic abscesses developed, the patient agreed to revision surgery. The endograft was explanted and an autologous in situ venous reconstruction was performed. As a result of post-operative complications, the patient died 3 days later.

          Conclusion

          This study demonstrates that autologous venous reconstruction is technically feasible. An earlier decision on such radical surgery could potentially have improved the patient's chances of survival.

          Highlights

          • Infection of a fenestrated abdominal endograft causes a major problem with high morbidity and mortality rates.

          • Explantation of the endograft with autologous venous reconstruction is technically feasible.

          • Earlier decision for radical surgery could potentially improve survival rates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Treatment and outcomes of aortic endograft infection.

          This study examined the medical and surgical management and outcomes of patients with aortic endograft infection after abdominal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with infected aortic endografts.

            Endovascular abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic (TEVAR) endografts allow aneurysm repair in high-risk patients, but infectious complications may be devastating. We reviewed treatment and outcomes in patients with infected aortic endografts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How To Diagnose and Manage Infected Endografts after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

              The prevalence of endograft infections (EI) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is below 1%. With the growing number of patients with aortic endografts and the aging population, the number of patients with EI might also increase. The diagnosis is based on an association of clinical symptoms, imaging, and microbial cultures. Angio-computed tomography is currently the gold-standard technique for diagnosis. Low-grade infection sometimes requires nuclear medicine imaging to make a correct diagnosis. There is no good evidence to guide management so far. In the case of active gastrointestinal bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, or extensive perigraft purulence involving adjacent organs, an invasive treatment should always be attempted. In the other cases (the majority), when there is not an immediate danger to the patient's life, a conservative management is started with a proper antimicrobial therapy. Any infectious cavity can be percutaneously drained. Management depends on the patient's condition and a tailored approach should always be offered. In the case of a patient who is young, has a good life expectancy, or in whom there is absence of significant comorbidities, a surgical attempt can be proposed. Surgical techniques favor, in terms of mortality, patency, and reinfection rate, the in situ reconstruction. Choice of technique relies on the center and the operator's experience. Long-term antibiotic therapy is always required in all cases, with close monitoring of the C-reactive protein.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EJVES Short Rep
                EJVES Short Rep
                EJVES Short Reports
                Elsevier
                2405-6553
                14 March 2017
                2017
                14 March 2017
                : 34
                : 21-23
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [b ]Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Vascular Surgery, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.University Hospitals LeuvenDepartment of Vascular SurgeryHerestraat 49LeuvenB-3000Belgium Inge.Fourneau@ 123456uzleuven.be
                Article
                S2405-6553(17)30002-6
                10.1016/j.ejvssr.2017.01.002
                5576164
                28856328
                aae94c99-2406-4ea5-951d-684e26f5bc45
                © 2017 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 October 2016
                : 31 December 2016
                : 29 January 2017
                Categories
                Short Report

                fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fevar),infection,autologous reconstruction

                Comments

                Comment on this article