15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE:

          Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery. However, an adequate protective response may balance the ischemia reperfusion damage. This study investigated whether laparoscopic donor nephrectomy modified the protective response of renal tissue during kidney transplantation.

          METHODS:

          Patients undergoing live renal transplantation were prospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the donor nephrectomy approach used: 1) the control group, recipients of open donor nephrectomy (n = 29), and 2) the study group, recipients of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 26). Graft biopsies were obtained at two time points: T-1 = after warm ischemia time and T+1 = 45 minutes after kidney reperfusion. The samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the Bcl-2 and HO-1 proteins and by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the mRNA expression of Bcl-2, HO-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor.

          RESULTS:

          The area under the curve for creatinine and delayed graft function were similar in both the laparoscopic and open groups. There was no difference in the protective gene expression between the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy groups. The protein expression of HO-1 and Bcl-2 were similar between the open and laparoscopic groups. Furthermore, the gene expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 correlated with the warm ischemia time in the open group ( p = 0.047) and that of vascular endothelial growth factor with the area under the curve for creatinine in the laparoscopic group ( p = 0.01).

          CONCLUSION:

          The postoperative renal function and protective factor expression were similar between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy. These findings ensure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy utilization in renal transplantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Delayed graft function in the kidney transplant.

            Acute kidney injury occurs with kidney transplantation and too frequently progresses to the clinical diagnosis of delayed graft function (DGF). Poor kidney function in the first week of graft life is detrimental to the longevity of the allograft. Challenges to understand the root cause of DGF include several pathologic contributors derived from the donor (ischemic injury, inflammatory signaling) and recipient (reperfusion injury, the innate immune response and the adaptive immune response). Progressive demand for renal allografts has generated new organ categories that continue to carry high risk for DGF for deceased donor organ transplantation. New therapies seek to subdue the inflammatory response in organs with high likelihood to benefit from intervention. Future success in suppressing the development of DGF will require a concerted effort to anticipate and treat tissue injury throughout the arc of the transplantation process. ©2011 The Authors Journal compilation © 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplantation. The short-term consequences of DGF are well known, but the long-term relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival is controversial in the published literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely estimate these relationships. We performed a literature search for original studies published through March 2007 pertaining to long-term (>6 months) outcomes of DGF. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, acute rejection and kidney function. When compared to patients without DGF, patients with DGF had a 41% increased risk of graft loss (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) at 3.2 years of follow-up. There was no significant relationship between DGF and patient survival at 5 years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). The mean creatinine in the non-DGF group was 1.6 mg/dl. Patients with DGF had a higher mean serum creatinine (0.66 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.57-0.74) compared to patients without DGF at 3.5 years of follow-up. DGF was associated with a 38% relative increase in the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.29-1.47). The results of this meta-analysis emphasize and quantify the long-term detrimental association between DGF and important graft outcomes like graft survival, acute rejection and renal function. Efforts to prevent and treat DGF should be aggressively investigated in order to improve graft survival given the deficit in the number of kidney donors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinics (Sao Paulo)
                Clinics (Sao Paulo)
                Clinics
                Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
                1807-5932
                1980-5322
                April 2013
                : 68
                : 4
                : 483-488
                Affiliations
                [I ]Hospital de Caridade, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Curitiba, Division of Urology, Curitiba/PR, Brazil.
                [II ]Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Pathology, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
                [III ]Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Renal Transplantation Section, Division of Urology, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
                Author notes

                Machado C contributed to the conception and design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript and statistical analysis. Malheiros DM contributed to the data acquisition and technical support. Adamy A contributed to the data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and statistical analysis. Santos LS and Silva Filho AF contributed to the data acquisition and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Nahas WC contributed to the conception and design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation and obtained funding. Lemos FB contributed to the conception and design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, statistical analysis and technical support.

                E-mail: christianombr@ 123456yahoo.com Tel.: 55 41 3252-9943
                Article
                cln_68p483
                10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08
                3634954
                23778338
                aaee25a3-2258-4ce8-ac09-c2bc3a6fd42a
                Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 October 2012
                : 18 November 2012
                : 11 December 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Categories
                Clinical Science

                Medicine
                apoptosis,gene expression,kidney transplantation,laparoscopy,reperfusion injury
                Medicine
                apoptosis, gene expression, kidney transplantation, laparoscopy, reperfusion injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article