7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Screening Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children with Snoring

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Efficient screening for severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is important for children with snoring before time-consuming standard polysomnography. This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to compare clinical variables, home snoring sound analysis, and home sleep pulse oximetry on their predictive performance in screening severe OSA among children who habitually snored. Study 1 included 9 (23%) girls and 30 (77%) boys (median age of 9 years). Using univariate logistic regression models, 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI3) ≥ 6.0 events/h, adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio (ANR) ≥ 0.78, tonsil size = 4, and snoring sound energy of 801–1000 Hz ≥ 22.0 dB significantly predicted severe OSA in descending order of odds ratio. Multivariate analysis showed that ODI3 ≥ 6.0 events/h independently predicted severe pediatric OSA. Among several predictive models, the combination of ODI3, tonsil size, and ANR more optimally screened for severe OSA with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 94%. In Study 2 (27 (27%) girls and 73 (73%) boys; median age, 7 years), this model was externally validated to predict severe OSA with an accuracy of 76%. Our results suggested that home sleep pulse oximetry, combined with ANR, can screen for severe OSA more optimally than ANR and tonsil size among children with snoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

            The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force reviewed the current rules for scoring respiratory events in the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring and Sleep and Associated Events to determine if revision was indicated. The goals of the task force were (1) to clarify and simplify the current scoring rules, (2) to review evidence for new monitoring technologies relevant to the scoring rules, and (3) to strive for greater concordance between adult and pediatric rules. The task force reviewed the evidence cited by the AASM systematic review of the reliability and validity of scoring respiratory events published in 2007 and relevant studies that have appeared in the literature since that publication. Given the limitations of the published evidence, a consensus process was used to formulate the majority of the task force recommendations concerning revisions.The task force made recommendations concerning recommended and alternative sensors for the detection of apnea and hypopnea to be used during diagnostic and positive airway pressure (PAP) titration polysomnography. An alternative sensor is used if the recommended sensor fails or the signal is inaccurate. The PAP device flow signal is the recommended sensor for the detection of apnea, hypopnea, and respiratory effort related arousals (RERAs) during PAP titration studies. Appropriate filter settings for recording (display) of the nasal pressure signal to facilitate visualization of inspiratory flattening are also specified. The respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) signals to be used as alternative sensors for apnea and hypopnea detection are specified. The task force reached consensus on use of the same sensors for adult and pediatric patients except for the following: (1) the end-tidal PCO(2) signal can be used as an alternative sensor for apnea detection in children only, and (2) polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) belts can be used to monitor respiratory effort (thoracoabdominal belts) and as an alternative sensor for detection of apnea and hypopnea (PVDFsum) only in adults.The task force recommends the following changes to the 2007 respiratory scoring rules. Apnea in adults is scored when there is a drop in the peak signal excursion by ≥ 90% of pre-event baseline using an oronasal thermal sensor (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative apnea sensor, for ≥ 10 seconds. Hypopnea in adults is scored when the peak signal excursions drop by ≥ 30% of pre-event baseline using nasal pressure (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative sensor, for ≥ 10 seconds in association with either ≥ 3% arterial oxygen desaturation or an arousal. Scoring a hypopnea as either obstructive or central is now listed as optional, and the recommended scoring rules are presented. In children an apnea is scored when peak signal excursions drop by ≥ 90% of pre-event baseline using an oronasal thermal sensor (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative sensor; and the event meets duration and respiratory effort criteria for an obstructive, mixed, or central apnea. A central apnea is scored in children when the event meets criteria for an apnea, there is an absence of inspiratory effort throughout the event, and at least one of the following is met: (1) the event is ≥ 20 seconds in duration, (2) the event is associated with an arousal or ≥ 3% oxygen desaturation, (3) (infants under 1 year of age only) the event is associated with a decrease in heart rate to less than 50 beats per minute for at least 5 seconds or less than 60 beats per minute for 15 seconds. A hypopnea is scored in children when the peak signal excursions drop is ≥ 30% of pre-event baseline using nasal pressure (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative sensor, for ≥ the duration of 2 breaths in association with either ≥ 3% oxygen desaturation or an arousal. In children and adults, surrogates of the arterial PCO(2) are the end-tidal PCO(2) or transcutaneous PCO(2) (diagnostic study) or transcutaneous PCO(2) (titration study). For adults, sleep hypoventilation is scored when the arterial PCO(2) (or surrogate) is > 55 mm Hg for ≥ 10 minutes or there is an increase in the arterial PCO(2) (or surrogate) ≥ 10 mm Hg (in comparison to an awake supine value) to a value exceeding 50 mm Hg for ≥ 10 minutes. For pediatric patients hypoventilation is scored when the arterial PCO(2) (or surrogate) is > 50 mm Hg for > 25% of total sleep time. In adults Cheyne-Stokes breathing is scored when both of the following are met: (1) there are episodes of ≥ 3 consecutive central apneas and/or central hypopneas separated by a crescendo and decrescendo change in breathing amplitude with a cycle length of at least 40 seconds (typically 45 to 90 seconds), and (2) there are five or more central apneas and/or central hypopneas per hour associated with the crescendo/decrescendo breathing pattern recorded over a minimum of 2 hours of monitoring.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline.

              This guideline establishes clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults and is intended for use in conjunction with other American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in adults.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Diagnostics (Basel)
                Diagnostics (Basel)
                diagnostics
                Diagnostics
                MDPI
                2075-4418
                26 June 2021
                July 2021
                : 11
                : 7
                : 1168
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sleep Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; hsieh1111@ 123456gmail.com (H.-S.H.); handneck@ 123456gmail.com (C.-J.K.)
                [2 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital, Xiamen 361126, China; zhuomy@ 123456adm.cgmh.com.cn
                [3 ]College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan; chhaihua@ 123456cgmh.org.tw (H.-H.C.); yushuhuang1212@ 123456gmail.com (Y.-S.H.); lpchuang1678@ 123456yahoo.com.tw (L.-P.C.)
                [4 ]Department of Family Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei Branch & Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
                [5 ]Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
                [6 ]Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; guosheli@ 123456gmail.com
                [7 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei City Hospital, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei 10629, Taiwan
                [8 ]Sleep Center, Department of Child Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
                [9 ]Sleep Center, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
                [10 ]Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; tbjkuo@ 123456gmail.com (T.B.-J.K.); cchyang@ 123456gmail.com (C.C.-H.Y.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: 5738@ 123456cgmh.org.tw (L.-A.L.); hyli38@ 123456cgmh.org.tw (H.-Y.L.); Tel.: +886-3328-1200 (ext. 3968) (L.-A.L.); +886-3328-1200 (ext. 3971) (H.-Y.L.)
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-9798
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-4016
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-5942
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-8995
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-595X
                Article
                diagnostics-11-01168
                10.3390/diagnostics11071168
                8304319
                34206981
                ab99b24d-4f23-473a-9720-5d4a4f957d5e
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 March 2021
                : 22 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio,children,obstructive sleep apnea,oxygen desaturation index,snoring sound energy,tonsil size

                Comments

                Comment on this article