Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Care for Rare Cancers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Many patients with cancer, often those with rare cancers such as sarcomas, travel long distances to access expert care. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated widespread changes in delivery of cancer care, including rapid adoption of telemedicine-based care. We aimed to evaluate the impact of telemedicine on patients, clinicians, and care delivery at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) Sarcoma Unit during the pandemic.

          METHODS

          Data were extracted from patient records for all planned outpatient appointments at the RMH Sarcoma Unit from March 23 to April 24, 2020. Patients and clinicians completed separate questionnaires to understand their experiences.

          RESULTS

          Of 379 planned face-to-face appointments, 283 (75%) were converted to telemedicine. Face-to-face appointments remained for patients who needed urgent start of therapy or performance status assessment. Patients lived on average > 1.5 hours from RMH. Patient satisfaction (n = 108) with telemedicine was high (mean, 9/10), and only 48% (n = 52/108) would not want to hear bad news using telemedicine. Clinicians found telemedicine efficient, with no associated increased workload, compared with face-to-face appointments. Clinicians indicated lack of physical examination did not often affect care provision when using telemedicine. Most clinicians (n = 17; 94%) believed telemedicine use was practice changing; congruently, 80% (n = 86/108) of patients desired some telemedicine as part of their future care, citing reduced cost and travel time.

          CONCLUSION

          Telemedicine can revolutionize delivery of cancer care, particularly for patients with rare cancers who often live far away from expert centers. Our study demonstrates important patient and clinician benefits; assessment of longer-term impact on patient outcomes and health care systems is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer

          The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is of international concern. We appreciated the Comment from Wenhua Liang and colleagues 1 published in The Lancet Oncology on Feb 14, 2020, which, to the best of our knowledge, was the first to focus on COVID-19 infection in patients with cancer. The authors concluded by use of epidemiological statistics that because the proportion of patients with cancer histories was higher in a cohort with COVID-19 than in the population in China, patients with cancer were more likely to develop COVID-19. They found 18 COVID-19 patients with cancer histories among 1590 COVID-19 patients from 575 hospitals in 31 provincial regions. Of these 16 patients (two of the 18 patients had unknown treatment status), only four had undergone surgery or chemotherapy within the previous month; 12 had recovered from initial cancer treatments (eg, surgery or chemotherapy) and had no obvious immunosuppression. We therefore do not think the COVID-19 infections in the 12 survivors of previous cancers were associated with their cancers. COVID-19 is a highly contagious infection to which everyone, to our knowledge, is susceptible; the most important morbidity factor is exposure to an infection source. 2 Furthermore, although the authors indicate that patients with cancer had worse outcomes from COVID-19, they also reported the median age of these patients (63·1 years) to be significantly higher than for those without cancer (48·7 years), suggesting that older age is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. 3 In this COVID-19 outbreak, the major risk for patients with cancer is the inability to receive necessary medical services (both in terms of getting to hospital and provision of normal medical care once there) because of the outbreak. Since January, 2020, more than 30 000 medical workers have gone to Wuhan to help manage patients, prevent the spread of COVID-19, and contain the outbreak, which has affected medical services outside Wuhan because there are now fewer doctors in those regions. Patients are also advised not to visit hospitals because of infection risk. Consequently, some clinical trials are being delayed; enforced quarantine, as is widely the case in Wuhan, complicates hospital attendance for repeat appointments and continuity in care, and when severe complications or emergencies occur in patients with advanced cancers, treatment delays or unavailability are possible concerns. Adverse effects among patients who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (such as for severe myocarditis and pneumonitis) 4 are more challenging to diagnose and might not be treated promptly, which might affect their survival. During this epidemic, in addition to better protection, patients with cancer need online medical counselling and appropriate identification and treatment of critical cases. In endemic areas outside Wuhan, decisions on whether or not to postpone cancer treatment need to made on a patient-by-patient basis and according to the risk to the patient and the prevailing situation because delays could lead to tumour progression and ultimately poorer outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Telemedicine in Cancer Care

            Telemedicine uses telecommunications technology as a tool to deliver health care to populations with limited access to care. Telemedicine has been tested in multiple clinical settings, demonstrating at least equivalency to in-person care and high levels of patient and health professional satisfaction. Teleoncology has been demonstrated to improve access to care and decrease health care costs. Teleconsultations may take place in a synchronous, asynchronous, or blended format. Examples of successful teleoncology applications include cancer telegenetics, bundling of cancer-related teleapplications, remote chemotherapy supervision, symptom management, survivorship care, palliative care, and approaches to increase access to cancer clinical trials. Telepathology is critical to cancer care and may be accomplished synchronously and asynchronously for both cytology and tissue diagnoses. Mobile applications support symptom management, lifestyle modification, and medication adherence as a tool for home-based care. Telemedicine can support the oncologist with access to interactive tele-education. Teleoncology practice should maintain in-person professional standards, including documentation integrated into the patient’s electronic health record. Telemedicine training is essential to facilitate rapport, maximize engagement, and conduct an accurate virtual exam. With the appropriate attachments, the only limitation to the virtual exam is palpation. The national telehealth resource centers can provide interested clinicians with the latest information on telemedicine reimbursement, parity, and practice. To experience the gains of teleoncology, appropriate training, education, as well as paying close attention to gaps, such as those inherent in the digital divide, are essential.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meeting the ongoing needs of survivors of rarer cancer.

              With more treatment options for people with cancer long-term survivorship is increasing. Physical and psycho-social needs have been identified in survivors of common cancers but very little has been written about the needs of patients with rarer cancers. Patients treated for rarer cancer are discharged to the primary health care team (PHCT), yet little is known about the assessment, management and support of these patients. Thirty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with (1) survivors of and (2) people living with rarer cancer (i.e. <5% of cancer burden). Participants were asked about physical and psycho-social needs and service provision. Data were analysed thematically using Atlas ti. Contrary to expectation, disease-free survivors of rarer cancer were indistinguishable from those living with disease in their ability to cope, and range of symptoms and needs. Participants with a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) reported that they were well supported on their return home and their needs were met. Participants without a CNS were referred to the PHCT who were unsure how to assess or support them. These participants felt abandoned. There is a need for the rehabilitation of patients with rarer cancer to strengthen individual coping mechanisms, and family and social support. Although there are resource and training implications, this is a potential role for the PHCT, district nursing in particular, and may lead to more focused and targeted provision of services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JCO Glob Oncol
                JCO Glob Oncol
                go
                go
                GO
                JCO Global Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                2687-8941
                2020
                8 July 2020
                : 6
                : GO.20.00220
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [ 2 ]Sarcoma Patients Euronet e.V./Association, Wölfersheim, Germany
                [ 3 ]Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Robin L. Jones, MD, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, London, UK SW3 6JJ; Twitter: @RobinL_Jones; e-mail: robin.jones4@ 123456nhs.net .
                Article
                2000220
                10.1200/GO.20.00220
                7392777
                32639877
                ac11f73e-6a39-45da-8127-1edc3703d50d
                © by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 10 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 14, Pages: 6
                Categories
                00, GLWE
                395, Sarcomas
                Original Reports
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article