0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A contingent valuation approach to estimating the recreational value of commercial whale watching – the case study of Faxaflói Bay, Iceland

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is currently limited knowledge concerning the economic value of commercial whale watching from the perspective of the consumer's trip experience. This study outlines the results of an in-person contingent valuation survey, which asked whale watching tourists in Faxaflói Bay, Iceland, how much they would have been willing to pay beyond the paid ticket price. Based on a sample of 163 tourists, only 30 (18.40%) reported any consumer surplus, despite the majority stating positive satisfaction with the experience. Mean consumer surplus was 768 ISK (approximately 5.60 euros). Scaled up to the number of whale watching tourists in Faxaflói Bay in 2018 of 148,442, aggregate CS was approximately 114.0 million ISK (0.83 million euros), a 6.9% mark-up on estimated annual revenue generation derived from average ticket prices. The study provides new information on the economic value of whale watching in an area which had already been part-designated as a whale sanctuary.

          Highlights

          • Contingent valuation method used to estimate consumer surplus in whale watching.

          • Limited consumer surplus, with mean value of 768 ISK (5.60 euros / USD 6.22).

          • 81.60% of sample ( n = 163) report zero consumer surplus.

          • Informs the debate concerning the economic benefits of whale watching tourism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Whales as marine ecosystem engineers

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation.

            An experiment was designed to account for intention-behavior discrepancies by applying the theory of planned behavior to contingent valuation. College students (N = 160) voted in hypothetical and real payment referenda to contribute $8 to a scholarship fund. Overestimates of willingness to pay in the hypothetical referendum could not be attributed to moderately favorable latent dispositions. Instead, this hypothetical bias was explained by activation of more favorable beliefs and attitudes in the context of a hypothetical rather than a real referendum. A corrective entreaty was found to eliminate this bias by bringing beliefs, attitudes, and intentions in line with those in the real payment situation. As a result, the theory of planned behavior produced more accurate prediction of real payment when participants were exposed to the corrective entreaty.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results.

              Urban open space provides a number of valuable services to urban populations, including recreational opportunities, aesthetic enjoyment, environmental functions, and may also be associated with existence values. In separate meta-analyses of the contingent valuation (CV) and hedonic pricing (HP) literature we examine which physical, socio-economic, and study characteristics determine the value of open space. The dependent variable in the CV meta-regression is defined as the value of open space per hectare per year in 2003 US$, and in the HP model as the percentage change in house price for a 10 m decrease in distance to open space. Using a multi-level modelling approach we find in both the CV and HP analyses that there is a positive and significant relationship between the value of urban open space and population density, indicating that scarcity and crowdedness matter, and that the value of open space does not vary significantly with income. Further, urban parks are more highly valued than other types of urban open space (forests, agricultural and undeveloped land) and methodological differences in study design have a large influence on estimated values from both CV and HP. We also find important regional differences in preferences for urban open space, which suggests that the potential for transferring estimated values between regions is likely to be limited.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tour Manag Perspect
                Tour Manag Perspect
                Tourism Management Perspectives
                Elsevier Ltd.
                2211-9736
                2211-9744
                6 October 2020
                October 2020
                6 October 2020
                : 36
                : 100754
                Affiliations
                [a ]Environment and Natural Resources, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Gimli, Sæmundargötu 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
                [b ]Environment and Natural Resources, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Iceland, Gimli, Sæmundargötu 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
                [c ]Environment and Natural Resources, Faculty of Economics and Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Iceland, Oddi, Sæmundargötu 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
                [d ]Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Iceland, Oddi, Sæmundargötu 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author.
                Article
                S2211-9736(20)30121-5 100754
                10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100754
                7538099
                ad9b7c97-4bb4-48c2-b9d1-0bf94e60bb02
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 8 June 2020
                : 18 September 2020
                : 2 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                whale watching,consumer surplus,ecosystem services,contingent valuation,recreational value

                Comments

                Comment on this article