1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast cancer.

          Methods

          A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Studies exploring the impact of prehabilitation in participants with breast cancer were included. Studies were assessed independently according to pre-eligibility criteria, with data extraction and methodological quality assessed in parallel.

          Results

          3184 records were identified according to our search criteria, and 14 articles were included. Articles comprised of quantitative randomised controlled trials ( n = 7), quantitative non-randomised studies ( n = 5), a qualitative study ( n = 1), and a mixed-method study ( n = 1). The majority of selected studies completed exercise programs ( n = 4) or had exercise components ( n = 2), with two focusing on upper-limb exercise. Five articles reported complementary and alternative therapies ( n = 5). Two articles reported smoking cessation ( n = 2), with a single study reporting multi-modal prehabilitation ( n = 1). Mostly, prehabilitation improved outcomes including physical function, quality of life, and psychosocial variables ( P < 0.05). The qualitative data identified preferences for multimodal prehabilitation, compared to unimodal with  an interest in receiving support for longer.

          Conclusions

          Prehabilitation for patients with breast cancer is an emerging research area that appears to improve outcomes, however, ensuring that adequate intervention timeframes, follow-up, and population groups should be considered for future investigations.

          Implications for Cancer Survivors

          The implementation of prehabilitation interventions for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer should be utilised by multidisciplinary teams to provide holistic care to patients as it has the potential to improve outcomes across the cancer care trajectory.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

          This article provides a status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions. There will be an estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases (17.0 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million cancer deaths (9.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) in 2018. In both sexes combined, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer (11.6% of the total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (18.4% of the total cancer deaths), closely followed by female breast cancer (11.6%), prostate cancer (7.1%), and colorectal cancer (6.1%) for incidence and colorectal cancer (9.2%), stomach cancer (8.2%), and liver cancer (8.2%) for mortality. Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males, followed by prostate and colorectal cancer (for incidence) and liver and stomach cancer (for mortality). Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and lung cancer (for incidence), and vice versa (for mortality); cervical cancer ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality. The most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, however, substantially vary across countries and within each country depending on the degree of economic development and associated social and life style factors. It is noteworthy that high-quality cancer registry data, the basis for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs, are not available in most low- and middle-income countries. The Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development is an international partnership that supports better estimation, as well as the collection and use of local data, to prioritize and evaluate national cancer control efforts. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;0:1-31. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

            The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kellie.toohey@canberra.edu.au
                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res Treat
                Breast Cancer Res Treat
                Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
                Springer US (New York )
                0167-6806
                1573-7217
                21 October 2022
                21 October 2022
                2023
                : 197
                : 1
                : 1-37
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1039.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 7472, Faculty of Health, , University of Canberra, ; Bruce ACT, 2617 Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1039.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 7472, Prehabilitation, Activity, Cancer, Exercise and Survivorship (PACES) Research Group, , University of Canberra, ; Bruce ACT, Australia
                [3 ]Australian Capital Territory Breast Care, Calvary Public Hospital, Bruce ACT, Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.59490.31, ISNI 0000000123241681, Robert Gordon University, ; Aberdeen, AB10 7QB Scotland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1776-6200
                Article
                6759
                10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1
                9823038
                36269525
                ae3ef87b-d90b-4398-a3ae-2d3698756895
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 August 2022
                : 2 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Canberra
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                exercise,nutrition,nursing,psychology,wellness,cancer care
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                exercise, nutrition, nursing, psychology, wellness, cancer care

                Comments

                Comment on this article