40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Four Spatial Interpolation Methods for Estimating Soil Moisture in a Complex Terrain Catchment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many spatial interpolation methods perform well for gentle terrains when producing spatially continuous surfaces based on ground point data. However, few interpolation methods perform satisfactorily for complex terrains. Our objective in the present study was to analyze the suitability of several popular interpolation methods for complex terrains and propose an optimal method. A data set of 153 soil water profiles (1 m) from the semiarid hilly gully Loess Plateau of China was used, generated under a wide range of land use types, vegetation types and topographic positions. Four spatial interpolation methods, including ordinary kriging, inverse distance weighting, linear regression and regression kriging were used for modeling, randomly partitioning the data set into 2/3 for model fit and 1/3 for independent testing. The performance of each method was assessed quantitatively in terms of mean-absolute-percentage-error, root-mean-square-error, and goodness-of-prediction statistic. The results showed that the prediction accuracy differed significantly between each method in complex terrain. The ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighted methods performed poorly due to the poor spatial autocorrelation of soil moisture at small catchment scale with complex terrain, where the environmental impact factors were discontinuous in space. The linear regression model was much more suitable to the complex terrain than the former two distance-based methods, but the predicted soil moisture changed too sharply near the boundary of the land use types and junction of the sunny (southern) and shady (northern) slopes, which was inconsistent with reality because soil moisture should change gradually in short distance due to its mobility in soil. The most optimal interpolation method in this study for the complex terrain was the hybrid regression kriging, which produced a detailed, reasonable prediction map with better accuracy and prediction effectiveness.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Editor
          Journal
          PLoS One
          PLoS ONE
          plos
          plosone
          PLoS ONE
          Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
          1932-6203
          2013
          23 January 2013
          : 8
          : 1
          : e54660
          Affiliations
          [1]State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
          NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, United States of America
          Author notes

          Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

          Conceived and designed the experiments: BJF XLY. Performed the experiments: XLY BJF YHL FXS SW. Analyzed the data: XLY FXS SW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XLY FXS SW ML. Wrote the paper: XLY BJF YHL.

          Article
          PONE-D-12-17117
          10.1371/journal.pone.0054660
          3553001
          23372749
          ae5ec204-e7a2-464d-aff9-eca71e75cb40
          Copyright @ 2013

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

          History
          : 14 June 2012
          : 17 December 2012
          Page count
          Pages: 13
          Funding
          This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40930528), State Forestry Administration (No. 201004058) and the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams of “Ecosystem Processes and Services”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
          Categories
          Research Article
          Agriculture
          Agroecology
          Ecosystems Agroecology
          Soil Science
          Biology
          Ecology
          Restoration Ecology
          Soil Ecology
          Spatial and Landscape Ecology
          Terrestrial Ecology
          Earth Sciences
          Geography
          Physical Geography
          Geographical Hydrology
          Geoinformatics
          Physical Geography
          Geographical Hydrology

          Uncategorized
          Uncategorized

          Comments

          Comment on this article