11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      First manifestation of adult-onset Still's disease after COVID-19

      discussion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory disorder that usually affects young adults, with a bimodal peak at ages 15–25 years and 36–46 years. The disease is characterised by fever of more than 39°C, transient skin rash, leucocytosis, arthralgia, arthritis, or a combination of these symptoms. 1 In addition to at least two of the aforementioned major criteria, the Yamaguchi criteria for the diagnosis of AOSD require the presence of minor criteria—ie, sore throat, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, abnormal liver function tests, and negative tests for antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor. 1 Infections, malignancies, and other rheumatic diseases need to be excluded. The cytokine interleukin (IL)-1 has a central role in the pathogenesis of AOSD and inhibition of IL-1β by monoclonal antibodies, and blockade of the IL-1 receptor by antagonists significantly ameliorates the disease. 2 IL-1 drives the intense innate immune response by activating neutrophils, macrophages, and mast cells, and by leading to overexpression of several proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18, and TNF. 3 Viral or bacterial infections have been proposed as potential trigger, but the exact mechanisms underlying AOSD onset remain largely unknown. 4 SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2019, causing the COVID-19 pandemic. AOSD and COVID-19 share several clinical and laboratory features, including systemic inflammation, unremitting fever, high serum ferritin, and a potentially life-threatening cytokine release syndrome. Data obtained from single-cell analysis revealed IL-1β-associated inflammasome signatures and a significant expansion of CD14-positive, IL-1β-positive monocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with severe COVID-19.5, 6 Thus, AOSD and the severe immune over-reaction which occurs in some patients with COVID-19 might be triggered by the same mechanisms. Here, we report a case of severe AOSD manifestations emerging in a patient suffering from long-term sequelae of COVID-19 for 6 months. In Germany, in March, 2020, a 29-year-old White woman with no notable medical history developed signs of SARS-CoV-2 infection including sore throat, headache, anosmia, ageusia, generalised weakness, shortness of breath, diarrhoea, and chilblain-like skin eruptions of the toes. The patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab. There was no need for therapy or hospitalisation. RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 were negative on day 15 after the onset of first symptoms. The patient continued to have elevated temperatures of up to 38·0°C for another 8 days. After 24 days, the patient seemed to have recovered from COVID-19, but 4 days later her temperature was elevated to 38·3°C, and she presented with transient maculopapular rashes lasting for up to 2 h in various locations, arthralgia, headache, sore throat, and increased sweating at night. On day 29 after first onset of symptoms, another oropharyngeal swab was taken and showed a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2. For detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, five serum samples from April and May, 2020, were analysed by different commercial serological assays. The patient tested positive for antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany, and Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany) but negative for IgM and IgG against Spike protein (Euroimmun Diagnostik, Lübeck, Germany; Diasorin, Dietzenbach, Germany; and Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany). IgA tested using the Euroimmun assay showed low to borderline values. All samples did not show neutralising activity by SARS-CoV-2 plaque reduction neutralisation test. Of 522 patients tested for all aforementioned assays at the University Hospital Cologne (Cologne, Germany), only four other individuals shared the same constellation of positive antibody results. SARS-CoV-2-reactive memory CD4-positive T cells did not show signs of recent activation (Ki-67, CD38) on day 199 and displayed production of the cytokines TNF, IL-2, interferon-γ, IL-21 and IL-10, comparable to other patients with mild COVID-19. 7 During the whole 6-month period, the patient had persistent fatigue, resting tachycardia, shortness of breath, and recurrent macular rashes. A transthoracic echocardiogram did not show any abnormalities; nevertheless, the formerly athletic patient only managed to reach a workload of 100 W in exercise electrocardiogram. In September, 2020, 6 months after the diagnosis of COVID-19, the patient noted a sore throat, but RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was negative. In the days that followed, her general condition deteriorated because of myalgia, arthralgia, fever of up to 41·0°C, and lymphadenopathy. Laboratory tests showed an increased C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration of 49 mg/dL (reference value <0·5 mg/dL) and leucocytosis of 21·39 × 109 cells per L (reference range 4·4–11·3 × 109 cells per L). In addition, liver enzymes were elevated, with ASAT values of 123 U/L and ALAT values of 165 U/L (reference value <35 U/L). Moreover, NT-pro-BNP was significantly increased to 3856 pg/mL (reference value <125 pg/mL) and troponin T to 463 pg/mL (reference value <100 pg/mL). Finally, systemic inflammation was confirmed by an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of up to 94 mm/h (reference range <25 mm/h), ferritin values of up to 1771·8 ng/mL (reference range 15–150 ng/mL), and IL-6 serum concentrations of up to 865·0 pg/mL (<8 pg/mL). Laboratory tests for antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and diverse infectious agents were negative. Due to recurrent NSAID-refractory fever episodes with up to 41°C over a period of 3 days, the patient was admitted to hospital. Other clinical symptoms included concomitant evanescent salmon-coloured rashes, episodes of hypotension, and resting tachycardia. Mild pericarditis with a small amount of pericardial effusion and pleural effusions were detected by cardiac MRI. 3 days after admission to hospital, the patient was transferred to an intermediate care unit because of respiratory distress. A chest x-ray revealed pulmonary infiltrates. Vasculitis was ruled out by PET-CT; however, a bilateral basal pneumonia with partly encapsulated pleural effusions was detected. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage revealed an acute bronchitis with distinct collapse phenomena and little, non-purulent secretion. Analysis of peripheral blood samples did not show any viral or bacterial pathogens. Since an infectious disease or malignancy could be ruled out, AOSD was diagnosed. At this time point, the patient fulfilled all major and minor criteria of the Yamaguchi classification. 1 Treatment with intravenous prednisolone at 50 mg/day was introduced, but did not lead to sufficient improvement resulting in an increase of prednisolone dosage to 100 mg 3 days later. Although the CRP value declined, the clinical situation did not show adequate improvement and deteriorated a few days later, with extension of pericardial effusion to 1·4 cm pancordially within 24 h and transthoracic echocardiogram showing beginning congestion of the vena cava. Moreover, a swinging heart phenomenon and breath-dependent drops of pulse and systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg were observed. On that day, the patient was transferred to the University Hospital Cologne because of her poor condition. At the hospital, an additional treatment with the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra (subcutaneously at 100 mg/day) was initiated, and led to a significant improvement of clinical symptoms. The pericardial effusion resolved within 24 h. The patient was released from hospital 5 days later. 4 weeks later, all laboratory values had returned to normal. Prednisolone was slowly tapered, while treatment with anakinra was maintained during the following months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of AOSD onset after COVID19. The case of this patient shows that long COVID can mimic AOSD and delay the time point of diagnosis. This finding is important, because the number of patients with long-term sequelae of COVID-19 is continuously rising and early treatment of AOSD might prevent complications and reduce mortality. In this patient, the initial symptoms of COVID-19 were similar to those of AOSD. However, temperature was only slightly elevated during SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that AOSD was not present at this time, because AOSD is defined by intermittent fever above 39°C for at least 1 week. Remarkably, COVID-19 and AOSD share not only clinical features, but also common pathogenic pathways. In particular, IL-1 seems to have a central role in both diseases. Targeting IL-1 is a highly efficient treatment for AOSD and growing evidence points towards a similar role for IL-1 in COVID-19 hyperinflammation. A recent study 8 has shown that inhibition of IL-1 by treatment with anakinra significantly reduced hyperinflammation, respiratory insufficiency, and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with severe COVID-19. By contrast, IL-6 receptor inhibition was less efficient and reduced mortality only in a subset of patients. 8 These findings are in line with previous observations showing that treatment with anakinra was associated with clinical improvement in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. 9 The clinical observations support the assumption that IL-1 has a critical role in hyperinflammation during severe COVID-19. Interestingly, our patient had similar symptoms during SARS-CoV-2 infection and AOSD onset. These symptoms included dyspnoea, which is generally rare in AOSD affecting only approximately 5% of patients. 10 The common role of IL-1 in the pathogenesis of AOSD and COVID-19 could explain the close similarities between both diseases. We postulate that a potentially misdirected immune response against SARS-CoV-2 could have triggered disease onset of AOSD in our patient. We declare no competing interests. The patient provided informed consent for publication of this Comment. UW and DMK contributed equally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interleukin-1 blockade with high-dose anakinra in patients with COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and hyperinflammation: a retrospective cohort study

          Summary Background Mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and systemic inflammation is high. In areas of pandemic outbreak, the number of patients can exceed maximum capacity of intensive care units (ICUs), and, thus, these individuals often receive non-invasive ventilation outside of the ICU. Effective treatments for this population are needed urgently. Anakinra is a recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist that might be beneficial in this patient population. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy. We included consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) with COVID-19, moderate-to-severe ARDS, and hyperinflammation (defined as serum C-reactive protein ≥100 mg/L, ferritin ≥900 ng/mL, or both) who were managed with non-invasive ventilation outside of the ICU and who received standard treatment of 200 mg hydroxychloroquine twice a day orally and 400 mg lopinavir with 100 mg ritonavir twice a day orally. We compared survival, mechanical ventilation-free survival, changes in C-reactive protein, respiratory function, and clinical status in a cohort of patients who received additional treatment with anakinra (either 5 mg/kg twice a day intravenously [high dose] or 100 mg twice a day subcutaneously [low dose]) with a retrospective cohort of patients who did not receive anakinra (referred to as the standard treatment group). All outcomes were assessed at 21 days. This study is part of the COVID-19 Biobank study, which is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04318366. Findings Between March 17 and March 27, 2020, 29 patients received high-dose intravenous anakinra, non-invasive ventilation, and standard treatment. Between March 10 and March 17, 2020, 16 patients received non-invasive ventilation and standard treatment only and comprised the comparison group for this study. A further seven patients received low-dose subcutaneous anakinra in addition to non-invasive ventilation and standard treatment; however, anakinra treatment was interrupted after 7 days because of a paucity of effects on serum C-reactive protein and clinical status. At 21 days, treatment with high-dose anakinra was associated with reductions in serum C-reactive protein and progressive improvements in respiratory function in 21 (72%) of 29 patients; five (17%) patients were on mechanical ventilation and three (10%) died. In the standard treatment group, eight (50%) of 16 patients showed respiratory improvement at 21 days; one (6%) patient was on mechanical ventilation and seven (44%) died. At 21 days, survival was 90% in the high-dose anakinra group and 56% in the standard treatment group (p=0·009). Mechanical ventilation-free survival was 72% in the anakinra group versus 50% in the standard treatment group (p=0·15). Bacteraemia occurred in four (14%) of 29 patients receiving high-dose anakinra and two (13%) of 16 patients receiving standard treatment. Discontinuation of anakinra was not followed by inflammatory relapses. Interpretation In this retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 and ARDS managed with non-invasive ventilation outside of the ICU, treatment with high-dose anakinra was safe and associated with clinical improvement in 72% of patients. Confirmation of efficacy will require controlled trials. Funding None.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immune cell profiling of COVID-19 patients in the recovery stage by single-cell sequencing

            COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has recently affected over 1,200,000 people and killed more than 60,000. The key immune cell subsets change and their states during the course of COVID-19 remain unclear. We sought to comprehensively characterize the transcriptional changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during the recovery stage of COVID-19 by single-cell RNA sequencing technique. It was found that T cells decreased remarkably, whereas monocytes increased in patients in the early recovery stage (ERS) of COVID-19. There was an increased ratio of classical CD14++ monocytes with high inflammatory gene expression as well as a greater abundance of CD14++IL1β+ monocytes in the ERS. CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells decreased significantly and expressed high levels of inflammatory genes in the ERS. Among the B cells, the plasma cells increased remarkably, whereas the naïve B cells decreased. Several novel B cell-receptor (BCR) changes were identified, such as IGHV3-23 and IGHV3-7, and isotypes (IGHV3-15, IGHV3-30, and IGKV3-11) previously used for virus vaccine development were confirmed. The strongest pairing frequencies, IGHV3-23-IGHJ4, indicated a monoclonal state associated with SARS-CoV-2 specificity, which had not been reported yet. Furthermore, integrated analysis predicted that IL-1β and M-CSF may be novel candidate target genes for inflammatory storm and that TNFSF13, IL-18, IL-2, and IL-4 may be beneficial for the recovery of COVID-19 patients. Our study provides the first evidence of an inflammatory immune signature in the ERS, suggesting COVID-19 patients are still vulnerable after hospital discharge. Identification of novel BCR signaling may lead to the development of vaccines and antibodies for the treatment of COVID-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Preliminary criteria for classification of adult Still's disease.

              We have attempted to design classification criteria for adult Still's disease by analyzing the data obtained through a multicenter survey of 90 Japanese patients with this disease and of 267 control patients. The proposed criteria consisted of fever, arthralgia, typical rash, and leukocytosis as major, and sore throat, lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly, liver dysfunction, and the absence of rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody as minor criteria. Requiring 5 or more criteria including 2 or more major criteria yielded 96.2% sensitivity and 92.1% specificity. However, an exclusion process will be needed for an accurate classification, since this disease is relatively rare.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Lancet Rheumatol
                Lancet Rheumatol
                The Lancet. Rheumatology
                Elsevier Ltd.
                2665-9913
                26 March 2021
                26 March 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Center for Dermatology, Allergy and Dermatosurgery, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
                [b ]Department of Pulmonology, Allergology, Sleep and Respiratory Medicine, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
                [c ]Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne 50931, Germany
                [d ]CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne 50931, Germany
                [e ]Centre for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne 50931, Germany
                [f ]Institut of Virology, University of Cologne, Cologne 50931, Germany
                [g ]Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Germany
                [h ]Rheuma Praxis Barmen, Wuppertal, Germany
                [i ]Institute of Immunology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
                [j ]Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
                [k ]German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                Article
                S2665-9913(21)00072-2
                10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00072-2
                7997647
                33817663
                af61510e-e18e-4364-8350-64bc039a95fb
                © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Comment

                Comments

                Comment on this article