10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Positive impact of a clinical goal-directed protocol on reducing cardiac arrests during potential brain-dead donor maintenance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The disproportion between the large organ demand and the low number of transplantations performed represents a serious public health problem worldwide. Reducing the loss of transplantable organs from deceased potential donors as a function of cardiac arrest (CA) may contribute to an increase in organ donations. Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that a goal-directed protocol to guide the management of deceased donors may reduce the losses of potential brain-dead donors (PBDDs) due to CA.

          Methods

          The quality improvement project included 27 hospitals that reported deceased donors prospectively to the Transplant Center of the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil. All deceased donors reported prospectively between May 2012 and April 2014 were analyzed. Hospitals were encouraged to use the VIP approach checklist during the management of PBDDs. The checklist was composed of the following goals: protocol duration 12–24 hours, temperature > 35 °C, mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg, diuresis 1–4 ml/kg/h, corticosteroids, vasopressin, tidal volume 6–8 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 8–10 cmH 2O, sodium < 150 mEq/L, and glycemia < 180 mg/dl. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of CA.

          Results

          There were 726 PBDD notifications, of which 324 (44.6) were actual donors, 141 (19.4 %) CAs, 226 (31.1 %) family refusals, and 35 (4.8 %) contraindications. Factors associated with CA reduction included use of the checklist (odds ratio (OR) 0.43, p < 0.001), maintenance performed inside the ICU (OR 0.49, p = 0.013), and vasopressin administration (OR 0.56, p = 0.04). More than three interventions had association with less CAs (OR 0.19, p < 0.001). After 24 months, CAs decreased from 27.3 % to 14.6 % ( p = 0.002), reaching 12.1 % in the following two 4-month periods ( p < 0.001). Simultaneous increases in organ recovered per donor and in actual donors were observed.

          Conclusions

          A quality improvement program based on education and the use of a goal checklist for the management of potential donors inside the ICU is strongly associated with a decrease in donor losses and an increase in organs recovered per donor.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1484-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis

          Objective The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or “the Campaign”) developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations on process improvement and patient outcomes. Design and setting A multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the ICU, ED, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the US, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were “bundled” into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 h and within 24 h. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008. Main results Data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 years (P < 0.0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 years (P = 0.008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37 to 30.8% over 2 years (P = 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 years (95% CI, 2.5–8.4%). Conclusions The Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1738-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit*

            To determine whether a multifaceted systems intervention would eliminate catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs). Prospective cohort study in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with a concurrent control ICU. The Johns Hopkins Hospital. All patients with a central venous catheter in the ICU. To eliminate CR-BSIs, a quality improvement team implemented five interventions: educating the staff; creating a catheter insertion cart; asking providers daily whether catheters could be removed; implementing a checklist to ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines for preventing CR-BSIs; and empowering nurses to stop the catheter insertion procedure if a violation of the guidelines was observed. The primary outcome variable was the rate of CR-BSIs per 1,000 catheter days from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002. Secondary outcome variables included adherence to evidence-based infection control guidelines during catheter insertion. Before the intervention, we found that physicians followed infection control guidelines during 62% of the procedures. During the intervention time period, the CR-BSI rate in the study ICU decreased from 11.3/1,000 catheter days in the first quarter of 1998 to 0/1,000 catheter days in the fourth quarter of 2002. The CR-BSI rate in the control ICU was 5.7/1,000 catheter days in the first quarter of 1998 and 1.6/1,000 catheter days in the fourth quarter of 2002 (p = .56). We estimate that these interventions may have prevented 43 CR-BSIs, eight deaths, and 1,945,922 dollars in additional costs per year in the study ICU. Multifaceted interventions that helped to ensure adherence with evidence-based infection control guidelines nearly eliminated CR-BSIs in our surgical ICU.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement.

              This document was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations. Under the auspices of these societies, a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force was convened, incorporating expertise in critical care medicine, organ donor management, and transplantation. Members of the task force were divided into 13 subcommittees, each focused on one of the following general or organ-specific areas: death determination using neurologic criteria, donation after circulatory death determination, authorization process, general contraindications to donation, hemodynamic management, endocrine dysfunction and hormone replacement therapy, pediatric donor management, cardiac donation, lung donation, liver donation, kidney donation, small bowel donation, and pancreas donation. Subcommittees were charged with generating a series of management-related questions related to their topic. For each question, subcommittees provided a summary of relevant literature and specific recommendations. The specific recommendations were approved by all members of the task force and then assembled into a complete document. Because the available literature was overwhelmingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decision was made that the document would assume the form of a consensus statement rather than a formally graded guideline. The goal of this document is to provide critical care practitioners with essential information and practical recommendations related to management of the potential organ donor, based on the available literature and expert consensus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                glauco.w@brturbo.com.br
                ecoll@msssi.es
                r.lisboa.mi@gmail.com
                silvanawagner2009@hotmail.com
                arturmontemezzo@gmail.com
                fernanda_carolina@msn.com
                gabriel.lingiardi@gmail.com
                stefan_halla@hotmail.com
                tiagocarnin@gmail.com
                miriammachado77@gmail.com
                eduardoberbigier@gmail.com
                fernandobusetto@unimedsc.com.br
                ivonei22@yahoo.com.br
                kagerent@gmail.com
                brunosilva910@gmail.com
                manoeltassinari@gmail.com
                andrade.joel@uol.com.br
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                11 October 2016
                11 October 2016
                2016
                : 20
                : 323
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Central de Transplantes do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [2 ]Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [3 ]Organización Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Centro Hospitalar Unimed de Joinville, Joinville, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [5 ]Hospital Regional Homero de Miranda Gomes, São José, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [6 ]Hospital São Francisco, Concórdia, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [7 ]Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [8 ]Hospital Santa Isabel, Blumenau, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [9 ]Hospital Marieta Konder Bornhausen, Itajaí, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [10 ]Hospital e Maternidade São José, Jaraguá do Sul, Santa Catarina Brazil
                [11 ]Rua Doutor Plácido Gomes, 500 Bairro Anita Garibaldi, 89.202-050 Joinville, Santa Catarina Brazil
                Article
                1484
                10.1186/s13054-016-1484-1
                5057215
                27724931
                b021ae5c-4170-4226-851a-258ed8e9901e
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 March 2016
                : 13 September 2016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                organ donor,organ transplantation,donor management,donor management goals,checklist

                Comments

                Comment on this article