29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective Analysis: Relative Survival in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improved overall survival (OS) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). The purpose of this study was to compare OS in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP to that of general population.

          Methods

          Response and survival data in six consecutive or parallel prospective clinical TKI trials were analyzed. Estimated OS rates in the general population matched by age, gender, ethnicity, and year at diagnosis were obtained from national vital statistics reports. Survival was also assessed by response and type of TKI.

          Findings

          Of the 483 patients, 271 patients received imatinib, 105 nilotinib and 107 dasatinib. The age grouping was as follows: 15–44 years, 197 patients; 45–64 years, 222; 65–84 years, 64. Five-year OS in CML-CP decreased with increasing age: 15–44 years, 96% (95% confidence interval[CI], 93·2–99·2); 45–64 years, 94% (95%CI, 89·9–97·1); and 65–84 years, 80% (95%CI, 69·5–90·7). Five-year relative OS was only slightly lower compared to the matched general population: 15–44 years, 97% (95%CI, 94·0–100·0); 45–64 years, 97% (95%CI, 92·9–100·3); and 65–84 years, 92% (95%CI, 79·5–103·8). Five-year relative OS in all ages with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or better was similar to that in the general population.

          Interpretation

          With TKI, the expected survival of patients diagnosed with CML-CP is only slightly lower to that of the general population, and for those patients who achieved CCyR or better it is similar to that of general population. Due to the relatively smaller number of patients followed for 10 years and the small number of older patients, the 10-year relative OS has a wider confidence interval and might vary with longer follow-up. However, 10-year relative OS derived from the imatinib cohort is favorable, and, considering the overall better results with dasatinib and nilotinib, it is reasonable to expect that the results will remain at least as favorable with additional follow-up observation with dasatinib or nilotinib. Thus with access to TKI, it is possible that most patients with CML can enjoy a near normal life expectancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013.

          Advances in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment, particularly regarding tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mandate regular updating of concepts and management. A European LeukemiaNet expert panel reviewed prior and new studies to update recommendations made in 2009. We recommend as initial treatment imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib. Response is assessed with standardized real quantitative polymerase chain reaction and/or cytogenetics at 3, 6, and 12 months. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels ≤10% at 3 months, 10% at 6 months and >1% from 12 months onward define failure, mandating a change in treatment. Similarly, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) at 3 months and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) from 6 months onward define optimal response, whereas no CyR (Philadelphia chromosome-positive [Ph+] >95%) at 3 months, less than PCyR at 6 months, and less than CCyR from 12 months onward define failure. Between optimal and failure, there is an intermediate warning zone requiring more frequent monitoring. Similar definitions are provided for response to second-line therapy. Specific recommendations are made for patients in the accelerated and blastic phases, and for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Optimal responders should continue therapy indefinitely, with careful surveillance, or they can be enrolled in controlled studies of treatment discontinuation once a deeper molecular response is achieved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the BELA trial.

              Bosutinib is an oral Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase III Bosutinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib with imatinib in newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to bosutinib 500 mg per day or imatinib 400 mg per day. The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 12 months was not different for bosutinib (70%; 95% CI, 64% to 76%) versus imatinib (68%; 95% CI, 62% to 74%; two-sided P = .601); therefore, the study did not achieve its primary end point. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months was higher with bosutinib (41%; 95% CI, 35% to 47%) compared with imatinib (27%; 95% CI, 22% to 33%; two-sided P < .001). Time to CCyR and MMR was faster with bosutinib compared with imatinib (two-sided P < .001 for both). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in four patients (2%) on bosutinib compared with 10 patients (4%) on imatinib. A total of three CML-related deaths occurred on the bosutinib arm compared with eight on the imatinib arm. The safety profiles of bosutinib and imatinib were distinct; GI and liver-related events were more frequent with bosutinib, whereas neutropenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and edema were more frequent with imatinib. This ongoing trial did not meet its primary end point of CCyR at 12 months, despite the observed higher MMR rate at 12 months, faster times to CCyR and MMR, fewer on-treatment transformations to accelerated/blast phase, and fewer CML-related deaths with bosutinib compared with imatinib. Each drug had a distinct safety profile.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101643584
                43133
                Lancet Haematol
                Lancet Haematol
                The Lancet. Haematology
                2352-3026
                14 May 2016
                20 April 2015
                May 2015
                27 May 2016
                : 2
                : 5
                : e186-e193
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [2 ]Department of Hematology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Jorge E. Cortes, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 428, Houston TX, 77030, USA, Phone: +1-713-794-5783, Fax: +1-713-794-4297, jcortes@ 123456mdanderson.org
                Article
                NIHMS786194
                10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00048-4
                4884053
                26688093
                b1982c38-bfac-4e16-9d77-2da51d63361a

                This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                chronic myeloid leukemia,tyrosine kinase inhibitors,overall survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article