23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Persistent B cell memory after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is functional during breakthrough infections

      research-article
      1 , 16 , 1 , 16 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 2 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 3 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 3 , 2 , 17 , 1 , 3 , 15 , 17 ,
      Cell Host & Microbe
      The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
      SARS-CoV-2, breakthrough infections, memory B cells, COVID-19, waning immunity, salivary IgA, mucosal immunity, mRNA vaccine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in fully vaccinated individuals are considered a consequence of waning immunity. Serum antibodies represent the most measurable outcome of vaccine-induced B cell memory. When antibodies decline, memory B cells are expected to persist and perform their function, preventing clinical disease. We investigated whether BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine induces durable and functional B cell memory in vivo against SARS-CoV-2 3, 6, and 9 months after the second dose in a cohort of health care workers (HCWs). While we observed physiological decline of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, memory B cells persist and increase until 9 months after immunization. HCWs with breakthrough infections had no signs of waning immunity. In 3–4 days, memory B cells responded to SARS-CoV-2 infection by producing high levels of specific antibodies in the serum and anti-Spike IgA in the saliva. Antibodies to the viral nucleoprotein were produced with the slow kinetics typical of the response to a novel antigen.

          Graphical abstract

          Abstract

          Terreri, Piano Mortari, and colleagues show that memory B cells persist and increase months after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination even if specific antibodies physiologically decline. Health care workers with breakthrough infections had no signs of waning immunity, as memory B cells produce high levels of specific antibodies in the serum and saliva.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2

          Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected 78 million individuals and is responsible for over 1.7 million deaths to date. Infection is associated with the development of variable levels of antibodies with neutralizing activity, which can protect against infection in animal models1,2. Antibody levels decrease with time, but, to our knowledge, the nature and quality of the memory B cells that would be required to produce antibodies upon reinfection has not been examined. Here we report on the humoral memory response in a cohort of 87 individuals assessed at 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2. We find that titres of IgM and IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 decrease significantly over this time period, with IgA being less affected. Concurrently, neutralizing activity in plasma decreases by fivefold in pseudotype virus assays. By contrast, the number of RBD-specific memory B cells remains unchanged at 6.2 months after infection. Memory B cells display clonal turnover after 6.2 months, and the antibodies that they express have greater somatic hypermutation, resistance to RBD mutations and increased potency, indicative of continued evolution of the humoral response. Immunofluorescence and PCR analyses of intestinal biopsies obtained from asymptomatic individuals at 4 months after the onset of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revealed the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids and immunoreactivity in the small bowel of 7 out of 14 individuals. We conclude that the memory B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 evolves between 1.3 and 6.2 months after infection in a manner that is consistent with antigen persistence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Waning Immune Humoral Response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine over 6 Months

            Background Despite high vaccine coverage and effectiveness, the incidence of symptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been increasing in Israel. Whether the increasing incidence of infection is due to waning immunity after the receipt of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine is unclear. Methods We conducted a 6-month longitudinal prospective study involving vaccinated health care workers who were tested monthly for the presence of anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies. Linear mixed models were used to assess the dynamics of antibody levels and to determine predictors of antibody levels at 6 months. Results The study included 4868 participants, with 3808 being included in the linear mixed-model analyses. The level of IgG antibodies decreased at a consistent rate, whereas the neutralizing antibody level decreased rapidly for the first 3 months with a relatively slow decrease thereafter. Although IgG antibody levels were highly correlated with neutralizing antibody titers (Spearman’s rank correlation between 0.68 and 0.75), the regression relationship between the IgG and neutralizing antibody levels depended on the time since receipt of the second vaccine dose. Six months after receipt of the second dose, neutralizing antibody titers were substantially lower among men than among women (ratio of means, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.75), lower among persons 65 years of age or older than among those 18 to less than 45 years of age (ratio of means, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.70), and lower among participants with immunosuppression than among those without immunosuppression (ratio of means, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.46). Conclusions Six months after receipt of the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, humoral response was substantially decreased, especially among men, among persons 65 years of age or older, and among persons with immunosuppression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants

              Here we report on the antibody and memory B cell responses of a cohort of 20 volunteers who received the Moderna (mRNA-1273) or Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine against SARS-CoV-21-4. Eight weeks after the second injection of vaccine, volunteers showed high levels of IgM and IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) and receptor-binding-domain (RBD) binding titre. Moreover, the plasma neutralizing activity and relative numbers of RBD-specific memory B cells of vaccinated volunteers were equivalent to those of individuals who had recovered from natural infection5,6. However, activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants that encode E484K-, N501Y- or K417N/E484K/N501-mutant S was reduced by a small-but significant-margin. The monoclonal antibodies elicited by the vaccines potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2, and target a number of different RBD epitopes in common with monoclonal antibodies isolated from infected donors5-8. However, neutralization by 14 of the 17 most-potent monoclonal antibodies that we tested was reduced or abolished by the K417N, E484K or N501Y mutation. Notably, these mutations were selected when we cultured recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing SARS-CoV-2 S in the presence of the monoclonal antibodies elicited by the vaccines. Together, these results suggest that the monoclonal antibodies in clinical use should be tested against newly arising variants, and that mRNA vaccines may need to be updated periodically to avoid a potential loss of clinical efficacy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell Host Microbe
                Cell Host Microbe
                Cell Host & Microbe
                The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
                1931-3128
                1934-6069
                25 January 2022
                25 January 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Diagnostic Immunology Research Unit, Multimodal Medicine Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS; Viale di San Paolo, 15, 00146 Rome, Italy
                [2 ]Occupational Medicine/Health Technology Assessment and Safety Research Unit, Clinical-Technological Innovations Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Viale di San Paolo, 15, 00146 Rome, Italy
                [3 ]Microbiology and Diagnostic Immunology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS; Piazza Sant’Onofrio, 4, 00165 Rome, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
                [5 ]Laboratory of virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani” IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy
                [6 ]Laboratory of Cellular Immunology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani” IRCCS, Via Portuense, 292, 00149 Rome, Italy
                [7 ]Clinical Pathways and Epidemiology Function Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS; Piazza Sant’Onofrio, 4, 00165 Rome, Italy
                [8 ]Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Research Centre, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Viale di San Paolo, 15, 00146 Rome, Italy
                [9 ]Takis s.r.l., Via di Castel Romano, 100, 00128 Rome, Italy
                [10 ]Post-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Section of Occupational Medicine and Labor Law, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
                [11 ]Department of Emergency Medicine and General Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS; Piazza Sant’Onofrio, 4, 00165 Rome, Italy
                [12 ]Medical Direction, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS; Piazza Sant’Onofrio, 4, 00165 Rome, Italy
                [13 ]Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS; Piazza Sant’Onofrio, 4, 00165 Rome, Italy
                [14 ]Sapienza, University of Rome; Viale dell’Università, 37, 00185 Rome, Italy
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author
                [15]

                Lead contact

                [16]

                These authors contributed equally to the paper

                [17]

                These authors contributed equally to the paper

                Article
                S1931-3128(22)00039-7
                10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.003
                8820949
                35134333
                b1f192b4-0c3a-4ba5-b7e3-b6aa4cdc7c08
                © 2022 The Authors

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 17 November 2021
                : 24 December 2021
                : 10 January 2022
                Categories
                Article

                Microbiology & Virology
                sars-cov-2,breakthrough infections,memory b cells,covid-19,waning immunity,salivary iga,mucosal immunity,mrna vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content229

                Cited by50

                Most referenced authors1,601