3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sustained and improved guselkumab response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis regardless of baseline demographic and disease characteristics: pooled results through week 52 of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To evaluate the efficacy through 52 weeks of guselkumab, an interleukin 23-p19 subunit inhibitor, in subgroups of pooled psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients from the DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 trials defined by baseline patient characteristics.

          Methods

          Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies were enrolled in DISCOVER-1 (≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints, C reactive protein (CRP) level ≥0.3 mg/dL) and DISCOVER-2 (≥5 swollen and ≥5 tender joints, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL, biological-naïve). Randomised patients received 100 mg guselkumab at weeks 0, 4, and then every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) or placebo. Guselkumab effects on joint (ACR20/50/70), skin (IGA 0/1, IGA 0), patient-reported outcome (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index/Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) and disease severity (minimal disease activity/PsA Disease Activity Score low disease activity) endpoints were evaluated by patient sex, body mass index, PsA duration, swollen/tender joint counts, CRP level, percent body surface area with psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use at baseline.

          Results

          Baseline patients characteristics in DISCOVER-1 (N=381) and DISCOVER-2 (N=739) were well balanced across randomised groups. At week 24, 62% (232/373) and 60% (225/375), respectively, of guselkumab Q4W-treated and Q8W-treated patients pooled across DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 response versus 29% (109/372) of placebo-treated patients. Guselkumab treatment effect at week 24 was observed across patient subgroups. Within each patient subgroup, response rates across all disease domains were sustained or increased at week 52 with both guselkumab regimens.

          Conclusions

          Guselkumab Q4W and Q8W resulted in robust and sustained improvements in PsA signs and symptoms consistently in subgroups of patients defined by diverse baseline characteristics.

          Trial registration numbers

          NCT03162796, NCT03158285.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update

          Objective To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was followed by a consensus meeting to develop this update involving 28 international taskforce members in May 2019. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined. Results The updated recommendations comprise 6 overarching principles and 12 recommendations. The overarching principles address the nature of PsA and diversity of both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations; the need for collaborative management and shared decision-making is highlighted. The recommendations provide a treatment strategy for pharmacological therapies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local glucocorticoid injections are proposed as initial therapy; for patients with arthritis and poor prognostic factors, such as polyarthritis or monoarthritis/oligoarthritis accompanied by factors such as dactylitis or joint damage, rapid initiation of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is recommended. If the treatment target is not achieved with this strategy, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17A or IL-12/23 should be initiated, taking into account skin involvement if relevant. If axial disease predominates, a TNF inhibitor or IL-17A inhibitor should be started as first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors is addressed primarily after bDMARD failure. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition is proposed for patients in whom these other drugs are inappropriate, generally in the context of mild disease. Drug switches and tapering in sustained remission are addressed. Conclusion These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological management of PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis.

            To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ).

              Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide intrinsic knowledge about a patient's health, functional status, symptoms, treatment preferences, satisfaction, and quality of life. They have become an established approach for assessing health outcomes. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), introduced in 1980, is among the first PRO instruments designed to represent a model of patient-oriented outcome assessment. The HAQ is based on five patient-centered dimensions: disability, pain, medication effects, costs of care, and mortality. It has been validated by mail, in the office, by telephone, and by comparison with paraprofessional and physician judgments as a reliable instrument, and has been significantly correlated with other PRO instruments. Typically, one of two HAQ versions is used: the Full HAQ, which assesses all five dimensions, and the Short or 2-page HAQ, which contains only the HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) and the HAQ's patient global and pain visual analog scales (VAS). The HAQ-DI and the global and pain VAS (i.e., the short HAQ) have essentially retained their original content since their inception, while the Full HAQ undergoes periodic revision to address issues of contemporary scientific interest. The HAQ-DI has been translated or culturally adapted into more than 60 different languages or dialects and has become part of the National Institutes of Health "Road-map" Project, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                RMD Open
                RMD Open
                rmdopen
                rmdopen
                RMD Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2056-5933
                2022
                16 March 2022
                : 8
                : 1
                : e002195
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine - Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology , University of Rochester Medical Center , Rochester, New York, USA
                [2 ]departmentRheumatology Research , Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [3 ]departmentDivision of Dermatology and Venereology , Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva, Switzerland
                [4 ]Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates , Phoenix, Arizona, USA
                [5 ]departmentDepartment of Rheumatology & Internal Medicine , Michigan Medicine Rheumatology Clinic , Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [6 ]departmentImmunology , Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC , Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
                [7 ]departmentRheumatology , Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [8 ]departmentImmunology , Janssen Research and Development LLC , San Diego, California, USA
                [9 ]departmentImmunology Global Medical Affairs , Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson , Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
                [10 ]departmentBiostatistics , Janssen Research and Development LLC , Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
                [11 ]departmentDermatology and Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology , Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [12 ]departmentInstitute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK
                [13 ]departmentDivision of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases , Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Christopher T Ritchlin; christopher_ritchlin@ 123456urmc.rochester.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-1219
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-0457
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1831-5292
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7957-838X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4449-8501
                Article
                rmdopen-2022-002195
                10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002195
                8928386
                35296534
                b2d4e18f-7e9a-4efa-b1a0-d217cf546e15
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 04 January 2022
                : 11 February 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Psoriatic Arthritis
                1506
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                arthritis, psoriatic,biological therapy,therapeutics

                Comments

                Comment on this article