+1 Recommend
0 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Children's Cognitive and Affective Responses About a Narrative Versus a Non-Narrative Cartoon Designed for an Active Videogame

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Objective: This article presents the results of interviews conducted with children regarding their cognitive and affective responses toward a narrative and a non-narrative cartoon. The findings will be used to further explore the role of a narrative in motivating continued active videogame play.

          Materials and Methods: Twenty children (8–11 years old of mixed gender) watched two cartoons (narrative and non-narrative) and were subsequently interviewed. A thematic matrix was used to analyze the interviews.

          Results: The narrative cartoon ( n = 11) was only slightly preferred compared with the non-narrative one ( n = 9), with little difference among the participants. The theme categories identified during the analyses were plot, characters, and suggestions. The fight scenes were mentioned by the children as a likeable aspect of the narrative cartoon. In the non-narrative cartoon, the vast majority ( n = 17) liked the information about physical activity that was provided. The children enjoyed the appearance and personalities of the characters in both cartoons. A discrepancy in the data about the fight scenes (narrative cartoon) and characters (both cartoons) was found among the female participants (i.e., some girls did not like the fight and thought the characters were too aggressive). However, most of the children wanted to see more action in the story, an increase in the number of fight scenes (narrative cartoon), or more information about exercise and examples of exercises they could do (non-narrative cartoon). They also suggested adding a game to the non-narrative cartoon, including more characters, and improving the animation in both cartoons.

          Conclusions: The children preferred the narrative cartoon because of the story and the fight. Some gender differences were found, which further studies should investigate.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Games Health J
          Games Health J
          Games For Health Journal
          Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. (140 Huguenot Street, 3rd FloorNew Rochelle, NY 10801USA )
          01 April 2016
          : 5
          : 2
          : 114-119
          [ 1 ]Faculty of Public Health, University of the State of Sao Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil.
          [ 2 ]Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
          [ 3 ]USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, Texas.
          [ 4 ]Department of Communication Studies, College of Arts, Media and Design; Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University , Boston, Massachusetts.
          Author notes
          [ * ]

          Present address: Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

          [ † ]

          Editor-in-Chief, Games for Health Journal.

          Address correspondence to: Vanessa Fernandes Davies, PhD, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Estado de São Paulo Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904,, Brazil

          E-mail: va.davies@ 123456hotmail.co.uk
          PMC4842948 PMC4842948 4842948 10.1089/g4h.2015.0019
          Copyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
          Page count
          Tables: 2, References: 31, Pages: 6
          Fun and Games


          Comment on this article