5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of the feasibility of Juntos: A support programme for families of children affected by Congenital Zika Syndrome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The 2015-16 Zika epidemic resulted in thousands of children born with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). In Brazil, gaps in the health system often caused parents to be left with insufficient information and support. Consequently, we developed and piloted Juntos - a participatory support programme which aims to improve knowledge, capacities and build support networks for caregivers of children with CZS.  

          Methods: Six caregiver groups received the programme between August 2017 and June 2018: three in Rio de Janeiro and three in Bahia. We assessed the feasibility of Juntos against six of the eight areas of a feasibility framework described by Bowen et al. to consider whether Juntos ‘could work’. These areas were: acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation and limited efficacy. We used mixed methods including: 1) baseline and end-line questionnaires completed by all group participants; 2) in-depth interviews with 18 participants, seven facilitators and three key stakeholders; 3) participant focus group discussions after each session; 4) researchers session observation; and 5) recording programme costs. 

          Results: 37/48 (77%) enrolled families completed both questionnaires. Acceptability and demand were noted as high, based on participant responses to interview questions, focus group feedback and satisfaction scores. Potential for implementation and practicality were also demonstrated through interviews with facilitators and key stakeholders and analysis of project documents. Two groups included caregivers of children with non-Zika related developmental disabilities, showing potential for adaptability. Self-reported quality of life scores increased in caregivers between baseline and end-line, as did the dimensions of family relationships and daily activities in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS QL) Family Impact Module, showing limited efficacy.  

          Conclusions: The programme showed feasibility according to Bowen’s framework. However, further research of scale up, particularly in the areas of integration, expansion and limited efficacy are needed to ascertain if the programme is effective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How we design feasibility studies.

          Public health is moving toward the goal of implementing evidence-based interventions. To accomplish this, there is a need to select, adapt, and evaluate intervention studies. Such selection relies, in part, on making judgments about the feasibility of possible interventions and determining whether comprehensive and multilevel evaluations are justified. There exist few published standards and guides to aid these judgments. This article describes the diverse types of feasibility studies conducted in the field of cancer prevention, using a group of recently funded grants from the National Cancer Institute. The grants were submitted in response to a request for applications proposing research to identify feasible interventions for increasing the utilization of the Cancer Information Service among underserved populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory.

            Pediatric patients' self-report of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has emerged as an important patient-based health outcome. A practical, validated generic measure of HRQOL facilitates assessing risk, tracking health status, and measuring treatment outcomes in pediatric populations. The PedsQL is a brief, standardized, generic assessment instrument that systematically assesses patients' and parents' perceptions of HRQOL in pediatric patients with chronic health conditions using pediatric cancer as an exemplary model. The PedsQL is based on a modular approach to measuring HRQOL and consists of a 15-item core measure of global HRQOL and eight supplemental modules assessing specific symptom or treatment domains. The PedsQL was empirically derived from data collected from 291 pediatric cancer patients and their parents at various stages of treatment. Both reliability and validity were determined. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the core measure (alpha = .83 for patient and alpha = .86 for parent) were acceptable for group comparisons. Alphas for the patient self-report modules generally ranged from .70 to .89. Discriminant or clinical validity, using the known-groups approach, was demonstrated for patients on- versus off-treatments. The 11 scales showed small-to-medium positive intercorrelations, supporting the multidimensional measurement model. Further construct validity was demonstrated via a multimethod-multitrait matrix using standardized psychosocial questionnaires. The results support the PedsQL as a reliable and valid measure of HRQOL. The PedsQL core and modular design makes it flexible enough to be used in a variety of research and clinical applications for pediatric chronic health conditions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project AdministrationRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: Project AdministrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                4 March 2022
                2022
                : 7
                : 77
                Affiliations
                [1 ]International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
                [2 ]Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22250-020, Brazil
                [3 ]Dept of Hearing and Speech Services, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, 40110-902, Brazil
                [1 ]Prenatal Pediatrics Institute, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
                [2 ]George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
                [1 ]Inclusive Education, School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                Author notes

                Competing interests: One of the researchers (AD) joined the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) during the research period. Work on the research study was undertaken outside and separate to his PAHO duties.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-1591
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-7362
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-3751
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-0294
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-0023
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17419.1
                9127372
                35651695
                b3a3ccdc-79bf-4f0c-928d-3e94bece344b
                Copyright: © 2022 Duttine A et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 February 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 206719
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 212156
                This work was supported by Wellcome and DFID [206719/Z/17/Z].
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                zika,disability,microcephaly,early intervention,congenital zika syndrome,family,caregiver,brazil

                Comments

                Comment on this article